The Student Room Group

PGCE (PCET) - Where to go, and is it worth it?

I'm thinking seriously about pursuing a PGCE at sixth-form college and FE level (the Post-compulsory education and training certificate).

Are there any University rankings for this qualification as I don't know anything about the quality of the courses offered by respective Universities.

Also, does anyone have any experience of this qualification. Is it worth doing?
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 1
Gissing
I'm thinking seriously about pursuing a PGCE at sixth-form college and FE level (the Post-compulsory education and training certificate).

Are there any University rankings for this qualification as I don't know anything about the quality of the courses offered by respective Universities.

Also, does anyone have any experience of this qualification. Is it worth doing?

The number of universities offering a PGCE PCE is getting smaller; Exeter dropped out this year, and Greenwich the year before - there may be others that year too. Reading the experiences of applicants this year, the impression is negative, especially about finance (i.e. being told they would get a training bursary and then not receiving it). I am going to wait and see the budget comes out to see whether to apply for a secondary or further education PGCE.
Reply 2
evantej
The number of universities offering a PGCE PCE is getting smaller; Exeter dropped out this year, and Greenwich the year before - there may be others that year too. Reading the experiences of applicants this year, the impression is negative, especially about finance (i.e. being told they would get a training bursary and then not receiving it). I am going to wait and see the budget comes out to see whether to apply for a secondary or further education PGCE.



Thanks. You seem to be in a similar position to me regarding the PGCE dilemma.

My reservation about secondary is the thug factor (I have bitter experience of this) as I don't want to be spending more time offering crowd control to wasters rather than teaching my subject. But yes, FE colleges might not be so ubiquitous in 12 months time.
Reply 3
Gissing
Thanks. You seem to be in a similar position to me regarding the PGCE dilemma.

My reservation about secondary is the thug factor (I have bitter experience of this) as I don't want to be spending more time offering crowd control to wasters rather than teaching my subject. But yes, FE colleges might not be so ubiquitous in 12 months time.


You should have seen one class I had on my student associate scheme placement; in three weeks, only one person in the class did any work - one person, in half a lesson, in three weeks... I felt sorry for that teacher. In my first lesson, a girl spat on the carpet, two people fought (others were 'play fighting'), one almost fell out the window (seriously), and the head/security had to be called in to take pupils out of the class - some of which I never saw again. I imagine a lot of FE teachers have to teach basic literacy to these types so the problem just gets pushed onto someone else.

I think my hand has been forced by external factors involving my girlfriend, which means I will have to do secondary... If there is a God - he will give me PhD funding. :p:
Most FE teachers start off training as a secondary school teacher. The above experience sounds very extreme forms of behaviour which you would not get in most schools, don't let scare stories like that put you off 11-18!
Reply 5
caroline_p3
Most FE teachers start off training as a secondary school teacher. The above experience sounds very extreme forms of behaviour which you would not get in most schools, don't let scare stories like that put you off 11-18!

Give me a break. If you do your PGCE anywhere near Birmingham, Liverpool, London, Manchester or Nottingham then there is a good chance you will get put in a school like the one I described, if not worse.

From your previous replies it seems you teach PE, which is probably one of the reasons you have an idealistic view of teaching; if you taught English, mathematics or a modern language then you would have a completely different opinion.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 6
evantej
You should have seen one class I had on my student associate scheme placement; in three weeks, only one person in the class did any work - one person, in half a lesson, in three weeks... I felt sorry for that teacher. In my first lesson, a girl spat on the carpet, two people fought (others were 'play fighting'), one almost fell out the window (seriously), and the head/security had to be called in to take pupils out of the class - some of which I never saw again. I imagine a lot of FE teachers have to teach basic literacy to these types so the problem just gets pushed onto someone else.

I think my hand has been forced by external factors involving my girlfriend, which means I will have to do secondary... If there is a God - he will give me PhD funding. :p:



Sounds familiar.

If you're interested in doing a PhD, you could try to get a fully-funded PhD studentship by looking on jobs.ac.uk.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 7
Just wanted to post a word in favour of inner-city schools. I took a TA job in September this year in an inner London school. It's a reasonably challenging place- it got the lowest GCSE grades in the borough this summer, and more than 90% of students have English as an additional language. I've done half a term there already & have applied for my PGCE to 4 London universities. I won't pretend that there isn't some bad behavoir- there is. And inevitably there are some very frustrating, troublesome students.

BUT, the majority of the kids are pleasant, and they do want to learn. I haven't seen a lesson yet where most of the kids aren't working for the whole 55 minutes, and I work mostly with the lower-ability sets. I don't doubt the person's word above regarding the SAS placement, but I do object to the generalisation regarding schools in the UK's biggest cities. It's a myth that these children are all thugs - in my experience, for every truly "bad" child there are a classful of kids who are eager to work and to get on. Only today the school where I now work had a cake sale in aid of charity, and it was great to see children bringing in the items they'd baked, manning the stalls, and generally behaving in a really nice way.

But still- teaching isn't for everyone! And I certainly know that a Ph.D isn't for me- I left a year into mine. :smile:
evantej
Give me a break. If you do your PGCE anywhere near Birmingham, Liverpool, London, Manchester or Nottingham then there is a good chance you will get put in a school like the one I described, if not worse.

From your previous replies it seems you teach PE, which is probably one of the reasons you have an idealistic view of teaching; if you taught English, mathematics or a modern language then you would have a completely different opinion.



Idealistic view! hardly! I work in an inner London School and know what i see and hear every day! Yes i teach PE but that just means i teach in an unstructured setting, in all conditions (wind, rain, snow), where pupils are either so excited they find it hard to be quiet or they hate exercise so much they just want to sit there!
Classroom management is all about YOU, how you teach, what you do, the type of teacher you are.
Be a good, engaging teacher = minimal problems. I teach A-level and have as many problems with them as i do with KS3.

Go and get some observational experience around the area you want to work in and see what it is like.
Reply 9
caroline_p3
Idealistic view! hardly! I work in an inner London School and know what i see and hear every day! Yes i teach PE but that just means i teach in an unstructured setting, in all conditions (wind, rain, snow), where pupils are either so excited they find it hard to be quiet or they hate exercise so much they just want to sit there!
Classroom management is all about YOU, how you teach, what you do, the type of teacher you are.
Be a good, engaging teacher = minimal problems. I teach A-level and have as many problems with them as i do with KS3. [...]


It has nothing to do with how engaging a teacher is or how structured their setting may be; you simply cannot get around the fact that English, mathematics and modern foreign languages are the hardest subjects to teach. In science you can engage pupils' interest with practical experiments, but the former three unfortunately require a lot of 'manual learning', so to speak. Are you honestly suggesting that someone who does not enjoy PE (i.e. 'they just want to sit there') is as difficult to deal with as someone who deliberately disrupts a lesson time-after-time because they are forced to take a subject they have no interest in and, consequently, typically struggle with?

There is a rather morbid 'reason' as to why so much emphasis is placed on the ability of the teacher, consequently, this is why so many teachers struggle unnecessarily with stress etc.; they have been led to believe that if children do not learn then they are the ones to blame, which is a simply ridiculous suggestion in all honesty.
evantej
It has nothing to do with how engaging a teacher is or how structured their setting may be; you simply cannot get around the fact that English, mathematics and modern foreign languages are the hardest subjects to teach. In science you can engage pupils' interest with practical experiments, but the former three unfortunately require a lot of 'manual learning', so to speak. Are you honestly suggesting that someone who does not enjoy PE (i.e. 'they just want to sit there') is as difficult to deal with as someone who deliberately disrupts a lesson time-after-time because they are forced to take a subject they have no interest in and, consequently, typically struggle with?

There is a rather morbid 'reason' as to why so much emphasis is placed on the ability of the teacher, consequently, this is why so many teachers struggle unnecessarily with stress etc.; they have been led to believe that if children do not learn then they are the ones to blame, which is a simply ridiculous suggestion in all honesty.


And pupils aren't forced to do PE against their will? of course they are!
Classroom management is all about the teacher, how you deal with the challenging situations. 'Hard to deal with' Pupils are disruptive in every lesson regardless! Yes some pupils may struggle with english or Maths and have to take it at KS4 that is why they are in SETS! they won't struggle if the teaching is pitched to the right level. All pupils are different and everyone has their favourite subject. I am not saying one subject is harder than another i am saying we all face the same problems, and i am sorry but when you become a teacher maybe you will understand!
Reply 11
caroline_p3
And pupils aren't forced to do PE against their will? of course they are!
Classroom management is all about the teacher, how you deal with the challenging situations. 'Hard to deal with' Pupils are disruptive in every lesson regardless! Yes some pupils may struggle with english or Maths and have to take it at KS4 that is why they are in SETS! they won't struggle if the teaching is pitched to the right level. All pupils are different and everyone has their favourite subject. I am not saying one subject is harder than another i am saying we all face the same problems, and i am sorry but when you become a teacher maybe you will understand!


Come on; there is a bit of a difference between being forced to do mathematics and PE - even if you only accept the fact that pupils are forced to do more of the former. Even in my own experience at school, the pupils who did not like PE could still enjoy the lessons because they could socialise and participate with friends at a similar level; teachers always tended to focus more on the better pupils, especially when the weather was better and school sports were involved.

Good classroom management and sets do not make all that much difference to be honest since more often than not the worst teachers tend to get lumped with the lowest sets; all you are doing is sticking lots of people who do not care or are incapable of understanding the basics into a classroom managed by somewhere who cannot handle them. What is worse, in the experience I described above, the school thought it was a good idea to timetable almost all the bottom set English classes at the end of the day, and what is even more ridiculous is the fact that there was two-hour long lessons on Friday afternoons! :eek:
I would strongly advise you to look at the employment prospects for your subject specialism before choosing the PCET route. Bear in mind that at the end of it, you will not have QTS and this will hinder you in moving into the maintained secondary sector later on. If, like me, you wish to teach a non-facilitating subject then your employment prospects are not great unless you are prepared to relocate around Britain. QTLS is an option for you but this is an additional cost burden on yourself and not all schools are aware of its status so, again, consider your future options first before committing.

I went down the PCET route and now teach Politics in an FE college.
Original post by PoliticsPresh
I would strongly advise you to look at the employment prospects for your subject specialism before choosing the PCET route. Bear in mind that at the end of it, you will not have QTS and this will hinder you in moving into the maintained secondary sector later on. If, like me, you wish to teach a non-facilitating subject then your employment prospects are not great unless you are prepared to relocate around Britain. QTLS is an option for you but this is an additional cost burden on yourself and not all schools are aware of its status so, again, consider your future options first before committing.

I went down the PCET route and now teach Politics in an FE college.


This is 4 years old
Reply 14
Original post by PoliticsPresh


I went down the PCET route and now teach Politics in an FE college.



I know this is really old but I just posted a thread about how to get into teaching A Level Politics at an FE, do you have any advice?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending