I am actually scared of ISIS now

Original post by h.dan

1. FBI website.
2. Terrorist attacks which are any attacks that can be punishable by the law in public interest of safety, i.e. bombings, arson, vandalism, aircraft attacks etc.
3. Thanks babe.

1) cool, then give me the link to the page
2) lmao vandalism is terrorism? are you ****in' kidding? I don't even need to say much to you - you're refuting yourself pretty well to be honest
3) thank you for saying thank you

Reply 44

RulesforRadicals

2

Original post by sleepysnooze

1) cool, then give me the link to the page
2) lmao vandalism is terrorism? are you ****in' kidding? I don't even need to say much to you - you're refuting yourself pretty well to be honest
3) thank you for saying thank you

I agree with you here

Anyone who puts petty vandalism or arson where nobody is hurt into the same category as suicide bombings and mass shootings is a ****ing Mr Bean.

If someone puts itching power in David Cameron's shoes are they literally as bad as the Paris attackers? I don't think so.

Reply 45

h.dan

8

Original post by sleepysnooze

1) cool, then give me the link to the page
2) lmao vandalism is terrorism? are you ****in' kidding? I don't even need to say much to you - you're refuting yourself pretty well to be honest
3) thank you for saying thank you

1. Look for it yourself, I'm on my phone and it will take me 3 years. You probably won't even look which therefore shows how ignorant you actually are calling ALL, EVERY SINGLE terrorist a MUSLIM. Basically you're saying that if there are 1 million terrorists in this world, 1,000,000 of them would be Muslim. Use your brain for once you noob. What are the odds for this to be true? 0%. What about the white people, the black people, the other non-muslim people who AGREE with groups such as ISIS and have decided to join them. They are not Muslim and they are terrorists therefore not making every single terrorist a Muslim.
2. Yes, vandalism is terrorism. That's just my opinion, just like your OPINION, not fact, OPINION, that all terrorists are Muslims. Yours is an opinion because it's simply not true. Deliberate destruction/damage of property is unauthorised use of violence.
3. No problem for you saying thank you for me thanking you.

Reply 46

username1969391

14

Original post by Johann von Gauss

The IRA? Free french? Israel? KKK? Are these people muslim??

Fascist bigot

Learn the meaning of 'fascist' and 'bigot' before you start using them. To be honest, these words have pretty much lost any meaning for me since liberals constantly use them as buzzwords against anyone that has a different opinion to them.

Reply 47

BookBird

Original post by the bear

great job on blurring Ms Glocke's name

:rofl:

Hey, that wasn't my job. Leave Linda alone.

Reply 48

Original post by h.dan

1. Look for it yourself, I'm on my phone and it will take me 3 years. You probably won't even look which therefore shows how ignorant you actually are calling ALL, EVERY SINGLE terrorist a MUSLIM. Basically you're saying that if there are 1 million terrorists in this world, 1,000,000 of them would be Muslim. Use your brain for once you noob. What are the odds for this to be true? 0%. What about the white people, the black people, the other non-muslim people who AGREE with groups such as ISIS and have decided to join them. They are not Muslim and they are terrorists therefore not making every single terrorist a Muslim.
2. Yes, vandalism is terrorism. That's just my opinion, just like your OPINION, not fact, OPINION, that all terrorists are Muslims. Yours is an opinion because it's simply not true. Deliberate destruction/damage of property is unauthorised use of violence.
3. No problem for you saying thank you for me thanking you.

1) no - you made a claim and failed to back it up. the burden of proof is on you. deal with it.
2) okay then, it's my opinion, that's it a mother****ing fact that your opinion is hilariously silly

Reply 49

h.dan

8

Original post by sleepysnooze

1) no - you made a claim and failed to back it up. the burden of proof is on you. deal with it.
2) okay then, it's my opinion, that's it a mother****ing fact that your opinion is hilariously silly

Stick to your opinion, I couldn't give a crap to be honest. If you really think that every single terrorist is a Muslim then you really need to reflect on your beliefs. I didn't make a claim, I made a statement by the way. I would back it up but I frankly cannot be bothered dealing with an ignorant person such as yourself.

I'm not gonna reply here anymore, good luck in the future and I hope you do think that one day all terrorists are not Muslims. Use your one brain cell for once, please.

Reply 50

Original post by h.dan

Stick to your opinion, I couldn't give a crap to be honest. If you really think that every single terrorist is a Muslim then you really need to reflect on your beliefs. I didn't make a claim, I made a statement by the way. I would back it up but I frankly cannot be bothered dealing with an ignorant person such as yourself.

I'm not gonna reply here anymore, good luck in the future and I hope you do think that one day all terrorists are not Muslims. Use your one brain cell for once, please.

I never claimed that "all" terrorists were muslims. I even clarified this before. I said "muslims are terrorists" in a very loose sense, because terrorists are usually always muslim. the only thing I regret here is not being crystal-clear with people like you. it isn't wrong to generalise that terrorists are predominantly muslims. you wouldn't honestly tell me that if you heard a news report that there had been a terrorist bombing, that you *wouldn't* automatically presumethat the bombings were done by *drum roll*...muslims.

(edited 8 years ago)

Reply 51

chocochip_

Original post by sleepysnooze

muslims sure do like blowing stuff up, huh?

If all muslims were terrorists we would all be dead. Idiot.

Reply 52

Original post by noor.m

If all muslims were terrorists we would all be dead. Idiot.

what I was obviously saying was that it's *always* muslims that are the terrorists, and that's been the perpetual case for this and perhaps the last generation.

Reply 53

Original post by sleepysnooze

2) how did that source, if it exists, define "terrorist"? I'd find it rather useless in defining a drug cartel a "terrorist" group.

Drug cartels clearly use terrorist tactics. They commit very public crimes, leave desecrated bodies around, with the aim of spreading fear through a population to increase their influence and make the establishment appear weak.

But you've already defined in your head that all terrorists are muslims, therefore drug cartels can't be terrorists.

Reply 54

Original post by Dheorl

Drug cartels clearly use terrorist tactics. They commit very public crimes, leave desecrated bodies around, with the aim of spreading fear through a population to increase their influence and make the establishment appear weak.

But you've already defined in your head that all terrorists are muslims, therefore drug cartels can't be terrorists.

so spreading fear = terrorism? see, if this is the kind of remote and desperate over-reaching you're resorting to, whereby your terms are so blurred and ambiguous that basically anybody can fulfil the definition, then you've lost all your credibility. in this sense, people with big muscles are terrorists. tall people are terrorists. the police and army are terrorists. sharks are terrorists. dogs are terrorists. the world is a terrorist for causing earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions.

Reply 55

Original post by sleepysnooze

so spreading fear = terrorism? see, if this is the kind of remote and desperate over-reaching you're resorting to, whereby your terms are so blurred and ambiguous that basically anybody can fulfil the definition, then you've lost all your credibility. in this sense, people with big muscles are terrorists. tall people are terrorists. the police and army are terrorists. sharks are terrorists. dogs are terrorists. the world is a terrorist for causing earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions.

You're right, because you're definition of "muslim = terrorist" is much more reasonable.

I'm saying spreading fear through actions to advance an agenda is terrorism. I'm not aware of any of the group you mention doing that. And what country do you live in where the police carry out actions so that they are truly feared by the general public?

Reply 56

Original post by Dheorl

You're right, because you're definition of "muslim = terrorist" is much more reasonable.

I'm saying spreading fear through actions to advance an agenda is terrorism. I'm not aware of any of the group you mention doing that. And what country do you live in where the police carry out actions so that they are truly feared by the general public?

no, I said "terrorists = muslims" and when I said "muslims like blowing things up" in my first statement, it was a generalisation, not a definition.
and, again, if that's what terrorism refers to in your mind, then you basically can't use that term any more, because nobody refers to ****ing graffiti as terrorism.

Reply 57

Original post by sleepysnooze

no, I said "terrorists = muslims" and when I said "muslims like blowing things up" in my first statement, it was a generalisation, not a definition.
and, again, if that's what terrorism refers to in your mind, then you basically can't use that term any more, because nobody refers to ****ing graffiti as terrorism.

Even if you reduce it to violent acts and killing then drug cartels commit terrorist acts, as a stated in my first post.

Reply 58

Original post by Dheorl

Even if you reduce it to violent acts and killing then drug cartels commit terrorist acts, as a stated in my first post.

so basically all violent crime is terrorism to you.

Reply 59