The Student Room Group

This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Feminism!

Scroll to see replies

Original post by ArtGoblin
I have never heard a feminism say that women shouldn't have to fight on the front line. This against it are usually men who think it is impossible for men to be professional if there is a woman around and use the argument that men will try to save the women, she will be raped or it will ruin 'morale'. They see the army as a male-only arena and are unhappy with the idea that a woman may be able to perform the same duties.

There are many different strands of feminism. Perhaps some veer into 'man hating', but it is not common and it is not representative of feminism as a movement. I have never met a feminist who thinks that women should have a privileged position in society due to past oppressions. I am inclined to think that most of the stories that people come out with about women who want to strip power from men and keep it for themselves are made up to discredit feminism by men who are threatened by the idea of women having equal rights to them. Increasingly women are using this as a way to disregard the feminism movement as those of us who do identify as feminists have our views mocked and are not taken seriously.


Women shouldn't fight on the front line was mentioned somewhere in the first few pages, I'm not too sure where though, sorry :/
I agree that not all feminists are man hating. I consider myself a feminist in that I believe that men and women should be treated equally, however I would never be so presumptious to say that women are better then men. I think that there are plenty of people who do mock feminists which I think is highly wrong. However when a feminist says ''All heterosexual intercourse is rape'' then you can't blame people for taking the p***
Original post by Lizzeraptor
Women shouldn't fight on the front line was mentioned somewhere in the first few pages, I'm not too sure where though, sorry :/
I agree that not all feminists are man hating. I consider myself a feminist in that I believe that men and women should be treated equally, however I would never be so presumptious to say that women are better then men. I think that there are plenty of people who do mock feminists which I think is highly wrong. However when a feminist says ''All heterosexual intercourse is rape'' then you can't blame people for taking the p***


Original post by ArtGoblin
I have never heard a feminism say that women shouldn't have to fight on the front line. This against it are usually men who think it is impossible for men to be professional if there is a woman around and use the argument that men will try to save the women, she will be raped or it will ruin 'morale'. They see the army as a male-only arena and are unhappy with the idea that a woman may be able to perform the same duties.

There are many different strands of feminism. Perhaps some veer into 'man hating', but it is not common and it is not representative of feminism as a movement. I have never met a feminist who thinks that women should have a privileged position in society due to past oppressions. I am inclined to think that most of the stories that people come out with about women who want to strip power from men and keep it for themselves are made up to discredit feminism by men who are threatened by the idea of women having equal rights to them. Increasingly women are using this as a way to disregard the feminism movement as those of us who do identify as feminists have our views mocked and are not taken seriously.


"There are several types of feminists.
Those who fight for equality by working for equality, those who fight for equality by holding up signs that talk about how men are pigs and women deserve to be worshiped, and those who sit at their desks at work and post updates on their Facebook/Twitter/whatever about the guys at their workplace being jerks who just don't understand that she is a goddess (on the inside) who deserves the same respect as the men who are sitting at their desks working.
Those who do, those who pretend to do, and those who demand shares of the reward they never even worked for.
Feminism, like most things in life, started with a pure intent that was twisted by those who saw an easy way out by playing victim of a crime they've only ever read about, and turned into something really, really ugly." Anonymous

Maybe add a poll to this thread of what TSR people "think Feminism means in general or to them if they see themselves as one" e.g. if a feminist: egalitarian or representing women only or man hating and what others think it means: nothing or egalitarian or representing women only or man hating or female supremacy(I think!) or whiners, etc. A poll?

I have never heard a feminism say that women shouldn't have to fight on the front line
; nor any of the other dangerous jobs or the jobs in the glass cellar list. They fight for jobs in the office, not in the field (outside).

In the past much more men were involved in helping women equalise, but now with 3rd wave feminism, even some women 'shy away' from being labelled a feminist. Also the rights of men are being removed simultaneously, so expect a fightback.
- Last month, in USA rape has been redefined, so if a couple both have alcohol, consent to sex only the man is the rapist & only the woman a victim; no means 'no', yes means 'unless I change my mind at a later year.' In this situation "whatever they may be in public life, whatever their relations with men, in their relations with women, all men are rapists and that's all they are."
- Last summer Australia's PM Julia Gillard removed the presumption of shared parenting after a divorce.

- Harrient Harman gave "misleading statistics to make it look as though female workers are having a tougher time than they really are" & also for rape (which would have lead to less wo/men reporting rape because the raped would think there is no point in being believed). Note in the link above 2008 ONS: part time (PT) women earnt more than men excluding overtime.2011 data on page 7, so
----M(£)-F(£)--Gender Pay Gap
FT 13.11 11.91 9.15%
PT 7.67 8.10 -5.61%
All 12.42 10.00 19.48%
expect headlines "women pull back on pay gap, earn 20% less than men!" Don't be following the herd :sheep:.
Page 8 shows 88.4% (out of 12.8 million) men, 57.7% (out of 12.3 million) women full timers, so as FT get more pay & more men working FT ¬ infer men will be paid more.
Like the majority of F/T workers (all else being equal) a person in the same job with continuous employment will earn more than a person who has gaps. (my post #89 p5)

Benefits from women joining ranks with the police, fire, construction, mining, fishing, etc is that Health & Safety practices grew for everyone; downside the standards for women fell whilst getting the same pay & some women suing because they failed the lower standards. A discussion by interested parties.

"Women want equal rights to do a job, equal benefits, but a lower standard of entry & less risk" and they get it! Would the "pay gap" be higher than 19.5% for 2011 if women got paid less for less risky &/or lower standard work than men? :wink:
When a group of special police came to where I lived, the woman came up the stairs 5th, out of 6 men. (Don't ask why police were there!)

Policeman and Policewoman: is it the same job?
Video starts by showing that white men get rejected "in favour for women and ethnic minorities" (so that's why the majority feel persecuted :holmes:; standards lowered & more cost for the rest of us) & policewoman with children suing for not getting taxpayer provided bonuses because they did not work after midnight/weekends the times of highest crime; money for nothing? Well you can't fight biology, but you can get a recession, with economy inefficiency.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 282
Legend.
Original post by 99luft Balons
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have
a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the ****work that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do." -- Robin Morgan

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin

"The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men."
-- Sharon Stone; Actress

"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." -- Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto

"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex." -- Valerie Solana, SCUM founder (Society for Cutting Up Men.)

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things." -- Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW

"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice." -- Andrea Dworkin

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin

"In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice." -- Andrea Dworkin

Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman." -- Andrea Dworkin

"To be rapeable, a position that is social, not biological, defines what a woman is." -- Andrea Dworkin

"Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: I am." -- Andrea Dworkin

"Men use the night to erase us." -- Andrea Dworkin

"The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality." -- Andrea Dworkin

"Men love death. In everything they make, they hollow out a central place for death, let its rancid smell contaminate every dimension of whatever still survives. Men especially love murder. In art they celebrate it, and in life they commit it. They embrace murder as if life without it would be devoid of passion, meaning, and action, as if murder were solace, stilling their sobs as they mourn the emptiness and alienation of their lives." -- Andrea Dworkin

"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it 'Her'. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination." -- Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson

"Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" -- Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression." -- Sheila Jeffrys

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catherine MacKinnon

"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs." -- Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.)

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." -- Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.

"Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo." -- Jodie Foster; Actress


This is actually sick and twisted. Funny, though, how there are loads of quotes there and yet only a few people who have said them. They need to be put in a mental health institution, seriously, seeing a man battered to a pulp with a high heel shoved in his mouth? ****ing disgusting.
Original post by kratos90
This is actually sick and twisted. Funny, though, how there are loads of quotes there and yet only a few people who have said them. They need to be put in a mental health institution, seriously, seeing a man battered to a pulp with a high heel shoved in his mouth? ****ing disgusting.


Ever wonder why you never hear feminists campaign for fatherhood rights, which are loaded against men at the moment? It's because they're not interested in men at any sort of operational level. They're not interested in equality, except where the system is inequitable to women.
Original post by marcusfox
Ever wonder why you never hear feminists campaign for fatherhood rights, which are loaded against men at the moment? It's because they're not interested in men at any sort of operational level. They're not interested in equality, except where the system is inequitable to women.


I'm a "Feminist", and I do.
Original post by ThePhilosoraptor
I'm a "Feminist", and I do.


Not all feminists do. I suspect you are very much in the minority. Which is fine, if they drop the nonsense about equality. If equality is your goal, why would you pick a divisive name?

By the way, I've never seen anyone "ever" campaigning for fatherhood rights under the banner of "feminism"

But I'm sure you'll prove me wrong with plenty of sources.
Original post by marcusfox
Not all feminists do. I suspect you are very much in the minority. Which is fine, if they drop the nonsense about equality. If equality is your goal, why would you pick a divisive name?

By the way, I've never seen anyone "ever" campaigning for fatherhood rights under the banner of "feminism"

But I'm sure you'll prove me wrong with plenty of sources.


No, I'm pretty much alone ATM (there's not a lot of male "Feminists" out there TBH - I specifically got into the subject at uni because I wanted to focus on the ways in which men were discriminated against/shaped by gender norms).

I believe the name "feminism" was picked because "humanism" was already taken. :wink:

There are huge issues with feminist research and activism, but it is worth noting that that's where pretty much all the cutting edge gender theory is, and I think we're on the cusp of a new era in gender politics. Women are now better defined and understood than men and as such have a lot more power in many ways to influence society and politics on the conceptual level. It might be time for men to start engaging with this debate in the same way that women did 70 years ago - to question what it means to be a man and the methods of self definition that are open - so that we can produce a productive counter-discourse and essentially work towards equality with women by not taking ourselves for granted.
Goods Idea OP. Feminism is a powerful and just movement. Happy to be a part.
Original post by marcusfox
Ever wonder why you never hear feminists campaign for fatherhood rights, which are loaded against men at the moment? It's because they're not interested in men at any sort of operational level. They're not interested in equality, except where the system is inequitable to women.


Mate, I'm a man, and I'm also a feminist. I know this girl who's a feminist and she is just like any other girl; likes clubbing, make-up and is really, really nice to everyone including boys. One of the nicest people I have ever met, wouldn't hurt a fly, but really confident and outgoing too. She is also into her feminism.

Feminism is for female equality with males. They have been oppressed for a long, long time. Feminists fight for female rights, why should they fight for male rights?

1) The female rights that they are fighting for are for equality with males, not superiority.
2) They are not stopping or opposing anyone fighting for male rights.

But when females across the world suffer from genital mutilation, stoning to death for cheating while men get nothing, less pay for doing the same thing etc. why should father's rights be a priority for them? Men can protest peacefully for this just like women do for their causes and I guarantee you wouldn't see any of the feminists telling these men that they should be fighting for feminism as well.

And I know lots of feminists like this. Yes I was disgusted by the posts of those radical feminists, but they really are the minority. If the little boys on here got away from their computer and met more people, they would soon realise this.

Women are not a threat. They protest peacefully. They want to be treated right and any man that doesn't want them to be treated right is not a real man.
Reply 290
Original post by twohanprincess
I am all for equality, but I think the word 'feminism' may be interpreted as being a sexist word... If a male group called themselves 'masculinists', would this be seen as acceptable? This may be a personal thing, and I am honestly not arguing with anyone or anything, but isn't something like 'advocate for women's equality' better?


That group already exists - they are called 'lads'
Reply 291
Original post by marcusfox
Ever wonder why you never hear feminists campaign for fatherhood rights, which are loaded against men at the moment? It's because they're not interested in men at any sort of operational level. They're not interested in equality, except where the system is inequitable to women.


That is also a feminist issue, though, at heart - it is founded on those social stereotypes about women being primary carers and men being 'breadwinners'.
Reply 292
i'm only just reading the first couple of pages of posts but if this hasn't already been said....

girls do actually do better than boys in school at every single level. primary school, gcse, a level, AND university. and i believe the factors that contribute to this are cultural. so girls are actually more intelligent (when it comes to exams anyway). and an argument of feminism would be that girls do better than boys at every level in school but men still occupy most of the highest positions in society. that isn't fair surely?

source is that i'm a sociology student.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by 3ka_xo
i'm only just reading the first couple of pages of posts but if this hasn't already been said....

girls do actually do better than boys in school at every single level. primary school, gcse, a level, AND university. and i believe the factors that contribute to this are cultural. so girls are actually more intelligent (when it comes to exams anyway). and an argument of feminism would be that girls do better than boys at every level in school but men still occupy most of the highest positions in society. that isn't fair surely?

source is that i'm a sociology student.


Does this prove that girls are smarter or that they work harder at school?

From my experience Girls tend to be the harder workers at School and University and boys tend to slack off a little. This I think changes once in the work place where level of effort tends to even out.
Original post by 3ka_xo
i'm only just reading the first couple of pages of posts but if this hasn't already been said....

girls do actually do better than boys in school at every single level. primary school, gcse, a level, AND university. and i believe the factors that contribute to this are cultural. so girls are actually more intelligent (when it comes to exams anyway). and an argument of feminism would be that girls do better than boys at every level in school but men still occupy most of the highest positions in society. that isn't fair surely?

source is that i'm a sociology student.


I have heard that argument before - i'm afraid it's one of those standard ghosters wheeled out by the media. It's also nonsensical.

If you compare like for like data sets then women are doing better than men. For example, in the 18-25 age bracket women are somewhere in the region of twice as likely (I'm afraid I can't remember the exact statistics) to be in employment and around three times as likely to be in a supervisory role when compared to males of the same age.

This age group has had "equal" opportunities and women are out performing men.

The "highest" positions in society tend to be occupied by people in their 50's or 60's. These people did not have equal opportunities in education. These changes take generations to filter through - education is only the preperation for working one's way to the top; nobody jumps straight in at that level.


(There are also issues with adjustments to the curriculum in some areas. For example, in the 1990's the SQA atracted criticism because girls were failing physics left right and centre. They changed the structure of the physics course, and now the pass rate is more even. However subsequent research has revealed the new structure favours the way girls learn and puts boys at a disadvantage. Generally speaking boys tend to perform at a high level over a restricted field whilst girls tend to do better with a broad base of learning. If you structure the curriculum to cover a broad base of topics you impose a gender preference upon the education system.)
Reply 295
Original post by ThePhilosoraptor
I have heard that argument before - i'm afraid it's one of those standard ghosters wheeled out by the media. It's also nonsensical.

If you compare like for like data sets then women are doing better than men. For example, in the 18-25 age bracket women are somewhere in the region of twice as likely (I'm afraid I can't remember the exact statistics) to be in employment and around three times as likely to be in a supervisory role when compared to males of the same age.

This age group has had "equal" opportunities and women are out performing men.

The "highest" positions in society tend to be occupied by people in their 50's or 60's. These people did not have equal opportunities in education. These changes take generations to filter through - education is only the preperation for working one's way to the top; nobody jumps straight in at that level.


(There are also issues with adjustments to the curriculum in some areas. For example, in the 1990's the SQA atracted criticism because girls were failing physics left right and centre. They changed the structure of the physics course, and now the pass rate is more even. However subsequent research has revealed the new structure favours the way girls learn and puts boys at a disadvantage. Generally speaking boys tend to perform at a high level over a restricted field whilst girls tend to do better with a broad base of learning. If you structure the curriculum to cover a broad base of topics you impose a gender preference upon the education system.)


ah ok, i think you best write to all the exam boards telling them their specifications are wrong and that they don't know what they're talking about then :biggrin:

i don't really care about this issue too much. it's not why i'm a feminist, i don't fight for this cause. but when hiring someone for a managerial role or something higher, the employer would be stupid to not consider time off for child birth, the issue of having to get someone else to do the job during maternity leave, women having to have time off when their children are sick (because most women earn less than their partner so it's less harmful for them to take the day off) etc. etc. so they've done better at school and got better qualifications but maybe it's just easier to give the slightly less intelligent male the job. (generally speaking, not all women are smarter than men so please don't assume that's what i'm saying)

p.s. since when was a supervisor role a top job in society..?
Original post by 3ka_xo
ah ok, i think you best write to all the exam boards telling them their specifications are wrong and that they don't know what they're talking about then :biggrin:

i don't really care about this issue too much. it's not why i'm a feminist, i don't fight for this cause. but when hiring someone for a managerial role or something higher, the employer would be stupid to not consider time off for child birth, the issue of having to get someone else to do the job during maternity leave, women having to have time off when their children are sick (because most women earn less than their partner so it's less harmful for them to take the day off) etc. etc. so they've done better at school and got better qualifications but maybe it's just easier to give the slightly less intelligent male the job. (generally speaking, not all women are smarter than men so please don't assume that's what i'm saying)

p.s. since when was a supervisor role a top job in society..?


I plan to, it's why i'm pursuing a PhD in Gender theory :wink:

I recognise that supervisor isn't a top job in society, however it is solid statistical evidence that women who are operating on an otherwise even footing are pushing ahead of males in terms of performance (insofar as that, although all other things are equal women are more likely to both have a job and get promoted within the jobs they have).

Unlike the statistics quoted which compare things which are unequal (i.e. men and women who were educated differently). Give it 40 years and if the situation remains unchanged then we can legitimately claim that despite performing better in schools women are not fairly represented. Based on school leaver results 40 years ago, however, women are in fact quite fairly represented at that level of business.

I'm not saying that gender doesn't affect employment (quite the opposite) I am saying that it's important to be able to evaluate evidence effectively if we want to achieve equality.
Reply 297
Original post by Polka Dot
Does this prove that girls are smarter or that they work harder at school?

From my experience Girls tend to be the harder workers at School and University and boys tend to slack off a little. This I think changes once in the work place where level of effort tends to even out.


hm interesting what you said there, made me think a little. but let's take gender out of the equation. two girls, both naturally intelligent (if that exists). one tries harder and get's better grades. the other slacks off. would you say that they are equally intelligent? i don't think i would. working hard means expanding your knowledge making you more intelligent right? i would also say that later on in life, if they were in the same position at the same company aiming for same promotion, the girl who got better grades at school and worked harder should be more deserving of it, even if they both are more or less of equal ability in the work place.
Reply 298
Original post by ThePhilosoraptor
I plan to, it's why i'm pursuing a PhD in Gender theory :wink:

I recognise that supervisor isn't a top job in society, however it is solid statistical evidence that women who are operating on an otherwise even footing are pushing ahead of males in terms of performance (insofar as that, although all other things are equal women are more likely to both have a job and get promoted within the jobs they have).

Unlike the statistics quoted which compare things which are unequal (i.e. men and women who were educated differently). Give it 40 years and if the situation remains unchanged then we can legitimately claim that despite performing better in schools women are not fairly represented. Based on school leaver results 40 years ago, however, women are in fact quite fairly represented at that level of business.

I'm not saying that gender doesn't affect employment (quite the opposite) I am saying that it's important to be able to evaluate evidence effectively if we want to achieve equality.


i guess we'll just have to wait and see then. maybe the argument is outdated, yes, but i wouldn't say a false tale wheeled out by the media. like i said, i don't really care for this issue too much, so i don't feel i can comment fairly, and it's late. nice points though.
Why is there such an uproar - mainly from women - when boys ask to be allowed to wear skirts to school, and yet when women want to wear trousers to work/school, they're hailed as success stories on the equality front?

Latest

Trending

Trending