The Student Room Group

Male sexual abuse at the hands of women

Scroll to see replies

Original post by vickidc18
Sexual violence is wrong no matter the gender, the main problem is male sexual assault victims are stereotyped as weak in societies view men should be able protect themselves and that sexual violence should only happen to females because we are the "weaker sex. Both genders are responsible for peddling this myth that men are strong and women are weak,


OOO the patriarchy doesn't sound nice to use when it in fact places men at a disadvantage.
Original post by vickidc18
The pill isn't always guaranteed to prevent pregnancy use a condom or don't have sex at all if you don't want a child.


You sound like a right laugh.
Original post by EllieC130
...why do people assume all feminists don't believe male sexual abuse happen? You don't have to be Einstein to know that -rolls eyes-


Em ... because Feminist tend to disregard what happens to men? Otherwise it'd contradict their cause lol.
Original post by manchesterunited15
In your previous post you basically said:

Men don't get raped as much as women so it doesn't matter when they do

and

Maybe the woman raped him because she thought he was going to rape her

Sounds very much like a feminazi to me


1. I still maintain the fact that female rape is the much bigger issue out of the two. That doesn't mean that male rape is a non-issue - both male and female rape are bad. :smile:

2. I do think she acted out of revenge i.e. the opportunity presented itself which is again wrong. However she did not set-out to rape anyone I believe it was an idea in the moment following the man threatening her with rape. Fear and anger make us do awful things at the worst of the times.
Original post by Shiroyuki
1. I still maintain the fact that female rape is the much bigger issue out of the two. That doesn't mean that male rape is a non-issue - both male and female rape are bad. :smile:

2. I do think she acted out of revenge i.e. the opportunity presented itself which is again wrong. However she did not set-out to rape anyone I believe it was an idea in the moment following the man threatening her with rape. Fear and anger make us do awful things at the worst of the times.



My god this is ludicrous.
Original post by Shiroyuki
How did floor him? Can't click on the link right now. :ninjagirl: How did she over power him? I'm not denying that some women are strong and can neturalise a guy however raping someone just takes a different kind of strength that I feel women don't possess over men.

The guy deserved it though tbh. :lol: He won't be robbing anyone again that's for sure.


I am pretty sure tat this describes EXACTLY what the problem in society is.

Imagine a man raped a woman who broke into his home, would you see that as legitimate?
Original post by Shiroyuki
1. I still maintain the fact that female rape is the much bigger issue out of the two. That doesn't mean that male rape is a non-issue - both male and female rape are bad. :smile:

2. I do think she acted out of revenge i.e. the opportunity presented itself which is again wrong. However she did not set-out to rape anyone I believe it was an idea in the moment following the man threatening her with rape. Fear and anger make us do awful things at the worst of the times.


1) Yes I agree it's a bigger issue overall, simply because there's more of it. But at an individual level, each are as bad as the other. You seemed to be disagreeing with that.

2) It went on for three days, it was not an idea in the moment.
Original post by Le Franglais
x



Original post by manchesterunited15
x


Love how you two have set aside your differences to set that bitch straight! Pos repped both :P
Original post by Huskaris
Love how you two have set aside your differences to set that bitch straight! Pos repped both :P



This is normal behaviour between a Manc and a Scouse :colone:
Original post by manchesterunited15
1) Yes I agree it's a bigger issue overall, simply because there's more of it. But at an individual level, each are as bad as the other. You seemed to be disagreeing with that.

2) It went on for three days, it was not an idea in the moment.


I have seen full on documentaries about women who have been raped over 3 days. I am guessing that most in society would prefer to see his interview in some sort of light hearted entertainment hour.

The hypocrisy of society is ridiculous. Either men "can't be sexually assaulted because they want it all the time" or they are weak men for being sexually assaulted (only saying sexually assaulted so I don't get all the pedants of TSR pointing out that men can not legally be raped by a woman)
Original post by Huskaris
I have seen full on documentaries about women who have been raped over 3 days. I am guessing that most in society would prefer to see his interview in some sort of light hearted entertainment hour.

The hypocrisy of society is ridiculous. Either men "can't be sexually assaulted because they want it all the time" or they are weak men for being sexually assaulted (only saying sexually assaulted so I don't get all the pedants of TSR pointing out that men can not legally be raped by a woman)


Don't you just love double standards ...
Original post by Le Franglais
Em ... because Feminist tend to disregard what happens to men? Otherwise it'd contradict their cause lol.
Rights for women and rights for men aren't always mutually exclusive you know so that last bit is bull****. And I doubt your first statement is true; many feminists, myself included, don't just disregard what happens to men. Otherwise none of us would take issues with divorce laws, which I strongly do.
Original post by Huskaris
I am pretty sure tat this describes EXACTLY what the problem in society is.

Imagine a man raped a woman who broke into his home, would you see that as legitimate?


Men are stronger than women, men are more capable of opposite gender rape than women. Ergo, more men rape women than women rape men.

A man raping a female robber is more likely imo and I would view it as more malicious, that much I can admit, because men are on the whole the bigger rape offenders than women.

We don't know what happened behind the scenes though and I still think that the man threatened her with rape first and possible even tried it on with her. Again I'm not saying this justifies what she did but I do think that it's not really as abhorrent as the usual rapist stories where someone sets out to rape someone i.e. the intent was never there she did it in the spur of the moment. We need more light to be shed on the story.
Original post by manchesterunited15
1) Yes I agree it's a bigger issue overall, simply because there's more of it. But at an individual level, each are as bad as the other. You seemed to be disagreeing with that.

2) It went on for three days, it was not an idea in the moment.


It did, yes. However the intent wasn't there for her to rape the man that's what I'm trying to say she didn't set out to rape him at the beginning of her day. He broke into her home/shop and possibly harrassed her perhaps even sexually. She acted out in revenge she is not as bad as the serial rapists that prey on vulnerable women at the end of a night out.
Original post by EllieC130
Rights for women and rights for men aren't always mutually exclusive you know so that last bit is bull****. And I doubt your first statement is true; many feminists, myself included, don't just disregard what happens to men. Otherwise none of us would take issues with divorce laws, which I strongly do.



So what are your thoughts in terms of divorce laws? this should be fun ...

This is something I totally agree on; something theAmazingAtheist uses:

Feminism looks to make equality by favouring one sex (women) .... is that really equality? NO, of course not.

You can't just say men are hateful, bashful, full of themselves; and you can't say women are manipulative bitches either ... you need to take a more general idea and say "Human beings are wrong! Let's focus on us as a whole"

Fact is BOTH sexes have it pretty bad, and having a party called Feminism isn't going to help - IN THE WEST.
Original post by Shiroyuki
It did, yes. However the intent wasn't there for her to rape the man that's what I'm trying to say she didn't set out to rape him at the beginning of her day. He broke into her home/shop and possibly harrassed her perhaps even sexually. She acted out in revenge she is not as bad as the serial rapists that prey on vulnerable women at the end of a night out.


The intent may not have been there at first. But what about the second time she did it, while he was tied up? What about when she force fed him viagra so she could carry on raping him?
Original post by Huskaris
I have seen full on documentaries about women who have been raped over 3 days. I am guessing that most in society would prefer to see his interview in some sort of light hearted entertainment hour.


I was scarred for life by an amnesty international guy who came to my school telling us about a woman who was raped to death :'(
Original post by redferry
I was scarred for life by an amnesty international guy who came to my school telling us about a woman who was raped to death :'(


raped to death how?
Original post by Kool_blaze
raped to death how?


They just raped her until she bled to death.
Original post by manchesterunited15
The intent may not have been there at first. But what about the second time she did it, while he was tied up? What about when she force fed him viagra so she could carry on raping him?


Anger and fear makes do really bad things. He must've done something to provoke this. I don't believe for a moment that the man happened to stumble on the houses/shop of a female rapist. She acted out of character as far as I'm concerned.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending