You are Here: Home >< Physics

# I'm stuck on a Nuclear Decay question watch

1. I'm given the initial activity to be 3000Bq with a half life of 6 hours. It's asking me for the number of unstable nuclei.

It also asked me for decay constant which I got to be 3.2x10^-5 by using ln2/(6x3600) which was correct.

I'm on IsaacPhysics so when I type the answer in and I'm told if my answer is correct or not. Can anyone help with finding the number of unstable nuclei?
2. (Original post by NatKH)
I'm given the initial activity to be 3000Bq with a half life of 6 hours. It's asking me for the number of unstable nuclei.
Unless I'm being silly, this doesn't seem to be a complete question. Can you put up the original wording please?
3. (Original post by atsruser)
Unless I'm being silly, this doesn't seem to be a complete question. Can you put up the original wording please?
Initial number of unstable nuclei = ?
Initial Activity = 3000Bq
Half Life = 6 Hours
Decay Constant = ?
Number of unstable nuclei left after 6 hours = ?
Activity after 6 hours = ?

What is the initial number of unstable nuclei

The ones with the question marks are the ones I have to work out.
4. (Original post by NatKH)
Initial number of unstable nuclei = ?
Initial Activity = 3000Bq
Half Life = 6 Hours
Decay Constant = ?
Number of unstable nuclei left after 6 hours = ?
Activity after 6 hours = ?

What is the initial number of unstable nuclei

The ones with the question marks are the ones I have to work out.
If that is the literal and complete wording of the question, then I have no idea. Surely there must be more to it than that?
5. (Original post by NatKH)
I'm given the initial activity to be 3000Bq with a half life of 6 hours. It's asking me for the number of unstable nuclei.

It also asked me for decay constant which I got to be 3.2x10^-5 by using ln2/(6x3600) which was correct.

I'm on IsaacPhysics so when I type the answer in and I'm told if my answer is correct or not. Can anyone help with finding the number of unstable nuclei?
The relationship A = lambda N is included in the formula booklets for Physics A Levels (where A = activity, lambda = decay constant, N = number of nuclei) - this is what you need!
6. (Original post by atsruser)
If that is the literal and complete wording of the question, then I have no idea. Surely there must be more to it than that?
That's all I'm given. Which is probably why I'm stuck on it
7. (Original post by Pangol)
The relationship A = lambda N is included in the formula booklets for Physics A Levels (where A = activity, lambda = decay constant, N = number of nuclei) - this is what you need!
That's what I've been using but it keeps saying it's the wrong answer. I'd do 3000/3.2x10^-5 = 9.4x10^7
But it says 9.4x10^7 is wrong.
8. (Original post by Pangol)
The relationship A = lambda N is included in the formula booklets for Physics A Levels (where A = activity, lambda = decay constant, N = number of nuclei) - this is what you need!
Ah right. This is a problem of terminology then (to me at least). I wouldn't typically refer to N as the "number of unstable nuclei".
9. (Original post by NatKH)
That's what I've been using but it keeps saying it's the wrong answer. I'd do 3000/3.2x10^-5 = 9.4x10^7
But it says 9.4x10^7 is wrong.
What does it claim that the answer is? This looks OK to me.
10. (Original post by atsruser)
Ah right. This is a problem of terminology then (to me at least). I wouldn't typically refer to N as the "number of unstable nuclei".
Out of interest, what would you describe that N as meaning?
11. (Original post by Pangol)
Out of interest, what would you describe that N as meaning?
I would just refer to it as the number of atoms remaining of the radioactive species in question. Or maybe "parents", depending on the context.
12. (Original post by Pangol)
What does it claim that the answer is? This looks OK to me.
Oh my goodness I found the answer. It was 9.3x10^7 but what I did was round the decay constant before so it changed the final answer. Thank you! I couldn't look at what the answer was before because it would just tell me if I was wrong or right.
13. (Original post by atsruser)
I would just refer to it as the number of atoms remaining of the radioactive species in question. Or maybe "parents", depending on the context.
But if they are the atoms of the radioactive sample we are considering, then by definition, they are unstable...
14. (Original post by Pangol)
But if they are the atoms of the radioactive sample we are considering, then by definition, they are unstable...
I wouldn't deny that. I'm merely saying that I personally am not familiar with that expression. Google comes up with 17900 results for that phrase, but I'm not sure what phrase to compare it against to see if that is few or many. I've looked in a couple of oldish texts that I have to hand, and it doesn't seem to crop up in them, so maybe it's come into usage in recent years.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 21, 2017
Today on TSR

Will it ever be possible?

### University open days

1. University of Cambridge
Wed, 26 Sep '18
2. Norwich University of the Arts
Fri, 28 Sep '18
3. Edge Hill University
Faculty of Health and Social Care Undergraduate
Sat, 29 Sep '18
Poll
• create my feed
• edit my feed

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE