a) the royal family generate far more income through tourism than they spend.
So that gives them the right to use tax money for their recreation etc. I agree with you but I am playing devils advocate. Workers in the tourism industry generate more money and add more value to the firms and economy than what they spend, does that entitle them to tax money?b) the armed forces would not exist because they were formed by the royalty (navy especially)
so for that fact they should still exist, just incase they create another great organisation? Which organisations have the royal family created recently (ie in the last 20 years), and I mean organisations with the sucess of the army etc, not like the royal geographical society etc?c) oxford, cambridge, imperial (created by queen victoria's husband so i was informed) would not exist, nor too would any of the institutions such as 'royal society'
d) the fact they are the royal stems from the fact that their ancestors put their lives on the line to lead people into battle- gaining the respect and becoming our country's leader!
And I suppose our mighty queen lizzie II has done all this in her tenure? Racism- there are scientific facts about different 'types' of people but they are not allowed to be officially declared as it would induce racial hatred/riots.
I could state 'race X is clearly more intelligent than race Y due to the following data:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_an...ps_among_races)
Ok we shall use the IQ test as our barometer. We all should know that even if it is the best measure of intelligence, it is not perfect. Also you could quote that extract of data, but to not evaluate that data shows that you always look at something at face value. I think it will be pretty stupid to conclude from that data that Asians are naturally more intelligent than hispanics. Reason being that Asians could have been taught early in their life etc whereas Hispanics haven't. That gives rise to a lot of other arguments such as if intelligence is natural, but I tend to agree that it takes both nature and nurture to be intelligent, thus this early teaching could have a large affect on intelligence.but people like you would class that as racist, i dont because its scientific.
lol @ scientific, so the group that carried out this test are perfect yes?How is it racist to say that in this country we dont want lots of kosovans, serbs and albanian people clogging up our country. Its our bloody country, we pay for it and we should be entitled to state this! If thats racist then i stand by what i said. Britain is becoming a dump because labour is too sh@t scared to say 'no'.
That is being quite xenophobic. What do you mean clogging up our country. You say that as if they are adding no value to our country and economy? lol @ you thinking that Britain is becoming a dump because a certain statement you've said could be classed as racist when you think it isnt.