i wish i had a foreskin...

What is it that you guys are concerned about?

If it's a sexual thing, look at it like this: yes sleeping with you will be slightly different to sleeping with a man with a foreskin. But likewise, no two men are the same, there are always physical differences, and there will be differences between two men with foreskins and two without. So sleeping with anyone will always be slightly different, same as women you sleep with. For women this is generally not a big deal or a largely noticeable thing either way.

My apologies if I jumped the gun and your feelings are not related to heterosexual sex at all, just my thoughts

I've heard of 'penis envy', but I don't think I've ever heard of 'foreskin envy'! Haha! :P

What's the issue?

Hi ! You are partially right that it is to do with sex but also choice and aesthetics. It would be interesting to know how many girls on here prefer the look of a uncut penis to a cut one (when flaccid).

Gotta be honest with you, I don't think we're super interested in the look of a flaccid penis more about when it's hard!

lol! i guess they look similar when hard but my other points still stand (plus as a bi guy i personally
think penii with foreskin look kind of cute like a caterpillar in its pupae?

lol! i guess they look similar when hard but my other points still stand (plus as a bi guy i personally
think penii with foreskin look kind of cute like a caterpillar in its pupae?

The whole point of FGM is to stop females from enjoying sex.
There's no health risks that come with cutting off your foreskin.

Ummm.... Not sure what to say to that lol. I don't really think of sexual organs as cute ever. Think a man might be offended if I referred to it as cute!! Haha

Male circumcision used to be used to stop boy's masturbating by dulling their sensitivity, it is arguable that it is still used in some parts of the world for that same reason. Children have died whilst being circumcised and others have been left infertile. Most circumcised males do not suffer these problems, instead they only have lower sensitivity and the knowledge that their parents decided to have part of their body removed without medical necessity or their consent.
Many reasons are given to why small infants should be abused in this way. The studies which supposedly show a lower risk of STDs etc were found to be inconclusive, with them being stopped before the study was fully completed. The most ridiculous and monstrous reason given for male circumcision is that it's in keeping with their cultural traditions or religion. People who use this as a reason are obviously blind to logic, it is not a valid reason for genital mutilation. I feel sorry for anyone who has been through this.
Male circumcision should be illegal unless it is a medical necessity that if left undone would cause serious harm to the person.

Hi ! You are partially right that it is to do with sex but also choice and aesthetics. It would be interesting to know how many girls on here prefer the look of a uncut penis to a cut one (when flaccid).

Removal of the foreskin greatly reduces sensitivity of the penis head.

The whole point of FGM is to stop females from enjoying sex.
There's no health risks that come with cutting off your foreskin.

That's true, and it's one of the main reasons for circumcision. By making the penis less sensitive it means the guy can last a lot longer, giving more time for his partner to enjoy sex before he shoots his load and spoils the party. Also if a man has a longer build-up to orgasm I think he may have a more intense one when it happens.

Nearly every American guy I've interacted with has no foreskin. It's really just a routine infant operation out there.

So is FGM in lots of countries.

Why would you want a foreskin? Honestly its ugly as hell. I never even knew what a foreskin looked like until like a few years ago, as guys seem to always be circumcised in porn.

You must've seen USA porn!