Why is zoophilia condemned and homosexuality not?

Animals can't consent, the end.
You can't ask an animal "Can I have sex with you?" and for them to understand what that means and entails and say Yes. The same reason paedophilia isn't accepted, because pre-pubescent children cannot consent to sex either.

Again, what about children? They can give consent.

I'm a child.



A talking horse?

(I'm not attracted to animals).

Animals don't have the intellectual capacity to give consent, same with children.

Why is this?

I am not talking about animals being forced to mate with humans, rather an intimate sexual relationship between both partners, to which both have consented in their own way and in which neither party is harmed.

It just seems like a double standard to me, I don't understand either zoophilia or homosexuality. The arguments for homosexuality and the arguments for zoophilia appear to be fairly similar. Yet one is outright condemned and the other is accepted as normal behaviour.

1. Both parties involved are consenting adults.

2. Both zoophilia and homosexuality are a sexuality, rather than a fetish.

3. Both involve an intimate relationship.

4. Both occur in nature.

5. Neither can result in offspring.

Thoughts? I don't even know why this came across my mind, I guess this is what happens when I do too much procrastinating.

Please note: I am not a troll, BNP supporter, a homophobe or a Zoophile, I am a student trying to have a sensible discussion and understand the logic behind people's opinions.

If you give the animal the choice ( you bend over, let it do its thing), I'm fairly certain you can count that as consent from the animal.

And a child can consent to sex, does that make it right?

No they can't. The age of consent is 16. Before then they aren't considered mature enough to give consent, even though they are far more capable than most sheep I've met.

An animal cannot initiate sex with a human. The human is the one that puts the animal into the situation. Bestiality is known to have deleterious side effects and in many cases leads to death. It is inherently harmful.

A 15 year old is technically still a child. Yet a 1/3 of teenagers have had sex before the age of consent?

What if I wanted to have sex with an older male that I truly like? What the ****?

No, it's not a double standard, because homosexuality is in the same group with heterosexuality. Zoophilia is a different concept all together and so therefore, there is no comparison whatsoever. Saying there is, is offensive. If you don't understand, that shows your ignorance.

Then why the hell does under age sex exists and is seen as normal?

Bull****.

A proper child. If you're going to take it to extremes, replace the word "child" with "two-year-old".

Then why the hell does under age sex exists and is seen as normal?

Bull****.

You don't have the capacity to give consent, according to law.

I assume you mean in general society, mostly schools? As in 15 year olds having boyfriends & sex etc?

It's because they aren't 'talked' about. They are to friends etc who don't give a crap, school children will not go to the police to report that their friends are having sex. Parent's won't either, nor will teachers.

The courts are already ridiculously busy. The CPS would not allow every single underage sex case to go through unless there is a specific detail that is not the norm.

Then why the hell does under age sex exists and is seen as normal?

Bull****.