This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
Scroll to see replies
"yay" - prostitution and brothels should be totally legal. why on earth would you ban either of them? nobody is benefited by it. if you don't like it, don't have anything to do with it then.
lol are you honestly suggesting sex should be taxed? how would they do that? brothels? that's one opinion, but that would give the prostitution industry's power to the brothels and not the sex workers themselves if the prostitutes themselves can't determine their own rates
Original post by sdotd
the only sensible thing to do is to make it legal and tax it
lol are you honestly suggesting sex should be taxed? how would they do that? brothels? that's one opinion, but that would give the prostitution industry's power to the brothels and not the sex workers themselves if the prostitutes themselves can't determine their own rates
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by zippity.doodah
"yay" - prostitution and brothels should be totally legal. why on earth would you ban either of them? nobody is benefited by it. if you don't like it, don't have anything to do with it then.
lol are you honestly suggesting sex should be taxed? how would they do that? brothels? that's one opinion, but that would give the prostitution industry's power to the brothels and not the sex workers themselves if the prostitutes themselves can't determine their own rates
lol are you honestly suggesting sex should be taxed? how would they do that? brothels? that's one opinion, but that would give the prostitution industry's power to the brothels and not the sex workers themselves if the prostitutes themselves can't determine their own rates
Yes Brothels would be ideal so the workers are safe
As long as no one is forced into it, if you choose to be any kind of sex worker then I think that's fabulous. It's your life, do as you please.
What's the difference between paying an escort for sex, and taking a girl out on a date and spending lots of money on her (food, gifts, etc) before she'll allow you to have sex with her? The answer is that there is no difference, all women are prostitutes, men ALWAYS have to pay for sex.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by G8D
Income tax...
it isn't based on a wage. one day they might get £100, and one day they might get £0. if you mean brothels, then *that* is based on a wage, but not "prostitution"
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by G8D
What do you mean? If you legalise the profession of prostitution you can extract tax from legitimate income and potentially corporation tax from brothels...
You don't 'tax sex', you simply continue to tax income.
You don't 'tax sex', you simply continue to tax income.
this was why I edited my post, because it seemed as if you were talking about "prostitution", not "brothels" - one is informal, one is formal.
It's their bodies.
I don't see that you can really go around telling women (or men) whom they are and are not allowed to have sex with, or what motivated them.
I don't see that you can really go around telling women (or men) whom they are and are not allowed to have sex with, or what motivated them.
Original post by Icebaker
What's the difference between paying an escort for sex, and taking a girl out on a date and spending lots of money on her (food, gifts, etc) before she'll allow you to have sex with her? The answer is that there is no difference, all women are prostitutes, men ALWAYS have to pay for sex.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Whew. Who broke your heart?
Original post by Truths
Whew. Who broke your heart?
Whew. Who broke your heart?
oh my god, how is that picture related to either your reply or their message?
Original post by zippity.doodah
oh my god, how is that picture related to either your reply or their message?
Mate don't. It's his/her "thing". I've never understood it, nor do I care for it. Every reply I've seen by that poster has a completely unrelated gif attached to it, usually of a "celebrity" woman.
Edit: oh yeah, thread. I'm a yay. If women want to exploit the anatomy that they've been given for profit then as long as they do it safely, wherein lies the problem?
Original post by Drunk Punx
Mate don't. It's his/her "thing". I've never understood it, nor do I care for it. Every reply I've seen by that poster has a completely unrelated gif attached to it, usually of a "celebrity" woman.
Edit: oh yeah, thread. I'm a yay. If women want to exploit the anatomy that they've been given for profit then as long as they do it safely, wherein lies the problem?
Edit: oh yeah, thread. I'm a yay. If women want to exploit the anatomy that they've been given for profit then as long as they do it safely, wherein lies the problem?
they must have a mental problem
Original post by Drunk Punx
Mate don't. It's his/her "thing". I've never understood it, nor do I care for it. Every reply I've seen by that poster has a completely unrelated gif attached to it, usually of a "celebrity" woman.
Edit: oh yeah, thread. I'm a yay. If women want to exploit the anatomy that they've been given for profit then as long as they do it safely, wherein lies the problem?
Edit: oh yeah, thread. I'm a yay. If women want to exploit the anatomy that they've been given for profit then as long as they do it safely, wherein lies the problem?
Well damn. It's seems i have made a name for myself already. Felt like I just registered yesterday.
Original post by zippity.doodah
oh my god, how is that picture related to either your reply or their message?
I felt it embodied the emotion behind my response quite well actually
Original post by Truths
I felt it embodied the emotion behind my response quite well actually
it really didn't. it never does.
Original post by Truths
Well damn. It's seems i have made a name for myself already. Felt like I just registered yesterday.
I felt it embodied the emotion behind my response quite well actually
I felt it embodied the emotion behind my response quite well actually
When a poster annoyingly attaches a gif to every damn post they make, they get noticed fairly quickly
Srsly, stoppit.
Original post by queen-bee
Nay
Pourquoi?
Latest
Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
