Homosexuality - What people think.

It's the same study, just a different article.

There are a lot of infertile people. I wonder what people think about them.

People also believe that black people are women are inferior. Now of course the black community and female community are both strong.

Don't render the old conventional wisdom wrong though.

Inferiority is too broad a word.
There is plenty of evidence to suggest that black people are intellectually inferior to other races. Many will call me a political cliche, but I oppose the hushing and ignoring of other factual points of view which go against the points of view that could be false but are promoted as the ultimate truth, whether with the aid of special interests or without them.
Since we're talking about sources, we have facts at hand, rather than religious script, so such abstractions are not a good way to refute facts.

So they wont have babies anyway?
And even if they did I think lizards wont adopt babies it is unique to smarter animals.

That they have an illness/disorder? Just like the Russian guy was saying that gays have disorders, and well backed it up pretty well.

.
Females are very different from males with their brain and other biological features, doesn't make them mental patients.

Yay, you read it. Of course they are, because they're the opposite sex..

.you are generalising

I've personally met many women who seemed perfectly normal to me

They can reproduce without a partner. They just like to have lesbian sex regardless.



Oh I forgot the fact that gay people are actually fertile and can have babies if they want to.

Or do you mean people who pull out, use condoms, straight people who do anal, catholic priests, etc all have an illness/disorder?

The majority of people do not support homosexuality. This is obvious, throughout every country there are more people against homosexuality than for it. Its an illusion that more people are for it, because as a result of peer pressure and society, people pretend to be for it.

The bible clearly teaches it's wrong as does the Quraan, however the Quraan does not directly condemn being homosexual, but the acts of homosexuality, for obvious and justifiable reasons. Hinduism and Sikhism are also against it. A large percentage of Atheists and are also opposed to it, for the reason of natural selection and so on...

I am personally mixed on the topic, I don't have anything against homosexual people, however I am against homosexual acts. Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, basically if everyone was homosexual we would decrease in number if proper reproduction was not happening.

What are your opinions?

Posted from TSR Mobile

The common sense is that something is quite likely to be 'normal' if it exists in every geographical location throughout all periods of history regardless of circumstances, and have even been an act practised by most supposedly heterosexual people. But then of course not everybody studies history.

So you're saying, gay people, in a civil partnership or marriage would go and have sex with females, but they like to **** men anyway?

And they CAN have babies, but they won't, shows how little regard you've got for them. Thats like a straight guy ****ing a lady, but is fine with ****ing a man sometimes - or maybe you, if your straight. You're using pointless arguments a condom... is a controlled method of doing it, and proves that they are more than fertile as they are obviously trying to stop it.

So you're saying, gay people, in a civil partnership or marriage would go and have sex with females, but they like to **** men anyway?

And they CAN have babies, but they won't, shows how little regard you've got for them. Thats like a straight guy ****ing a lady, but is fine with ****ing a man sometimes - or maybe you, if your straight. You're using pointless arguments a condom... is a controlled method of doing it, and proves that they are more than fertile as they are obviously trying to stop it.

Many same-sex couples have biological children. Please refrain from ignoring obvious facts.

Using a condom and having gay sex both are ways to make pregnancy impossible to an otherwise fertile person.

So you're saying, gay people, in a civil partnership or marriage would go and have sex with females, but they like to **** men anyway?

And they CAN have babies, but they won't, shows how little regard you've got for them. Thats like a straight guy ****ing a lady, but is fine with ****ing a man sometimes - or maybe you, if your straight. You're using pointless arguments a condom... is a controlled method of doing it, and proves that they are more than fertile as they are obviously trying to stop it.

lol 'biological children' you mean they go and **** women , or they do the test tuby thingy. And think about this, would a gay guy use a condom?

...I think he was suggesting they might choose to sleep with someone male/female in order to have a child?

That and they could have children via IVF or sperm donors etc.

Both methods exist.

Yes, many gay guys use condoms. But can't see how that's relevant regardless.

It's not even important how, but only that they do. He was making the big assertion that they don't.

DOes a gay guy use a condom to prevent his gay partner getting pregnant? No therefore being gay and a condom are not both methods of controlling being pregnant as you stated before.

There are no lesbian animals, it only happens with males.

Posted from TSR Mobile

No, people with a structural mental pathology in my opinion shouldn't be allowed to adopt children.
But I got your point, I just read some articles about gay animals raising orphaned babies.
It doesn't make a homosexual relationship conceptually useful though because they don't produce offspring. Both homosexual and heterosexual animals can die, and both can foster orphaned babies. The usefulness is incidental. You also don't technically need a relationship to perform functions required to take care of a baby.
Homosexuality is a pathology, but it doesn't mean that individuals having this pathology can't be useful.. It's a conceptual confusion the way you interpret my words.