# Combining uncertainties - percentage and absolute. Brief summary.

Watch
Announcements

In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties

The absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

eg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

This is

5.0 ±

Result

10.0 ±

(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

etc

If you need the

This is because square root in index form is to the power ½

√x = x

Multiply the

The

In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

Let's take an example. Assume you have all the uncertainties in the values in the formula and we want the uncertainty in

Step 1.

Add the % uncertainties in

Step 2.

Multiply the % uncertainty in

Step 3.

Convert those % uncertainties to absolute uncertainties in

Step 4.

Add the absolute ± uncertainties in

*If you would like a more advanced treatment of this topic I recommend the following.

http://www.rit.edu/cos/uphysics/unce...tml#systematic.

**at A Level**.*__You have two values, each with an absolute ± uncertainty.__**1. If you add or subtract the two (or more) values**to get a final valueThe absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

**2. If you multiply**__one value with absolute uncertainty__by a constantThe absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

**3. If you**

You add the % uncertainties in the two values to get the % uncertainty in the final value.__multiply or divide two (or more) values,__each with an uncertaintyeg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

**x**2.0 ± 0.1 mmThis is

5.0 ±

**2%**x 2.0 ±**5%**

Result

10.0 ±

**7%**

This is 10.0 ±**0.7**mm^{2}(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

**4. If you square a value**You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

**If you cube a value**you multiply the % uncertainty by 3etc

If you need the

**square root**of a value, you**divide**the % uncertainty by 2.This is because square root in index form is to the power ½

√x = x

^{½}**The general rule is**Multiply the

**% uncertainty**by the**index**.**What happens to % uncertainty when I multiply by a constant?**The

**% uncertainty**doesn't change. The**absolute uncertainty**is multiplied by the constant. (see 2 above)In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

**still 2%**

Note: This is consistent with 3. above.When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

**zero**.So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

**What if the formula I use to calculate my final value has both adding**__and__multiplication/division?Let's take an example. Assume you have all the uncertainties in the values in the formula and we want the uncertainty in

**s****s**= ut + ½at²Step 1.

Add the % uncertainties in

**u**and**t**to find the % uncertainty in**ut**Step 2.

Multiply the % uncertainty in

**t**by 2 (Rule 4 above) and add it to the % uncertainty in**a**to find the % uncertainty in**½at²**(The constant ½ has no uncertainty)Step 3.

Convert those % uncertainties to absolute uncertainties in

**ut**and in**½at²**Step 4.

Add the absolute ± uncertainties in

**ut**and**½at²**found in 3. above to get the absolute uncertainty in the final value of**s***If you would like a more advanced treatment of this topic I recommend the following.

http://www.rit.edu/cos/uphysics/unce...tml#systematic.

49

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties at A Level.

The absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

eg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

This is

5.0 ±

Result

10.0 ±

(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

etc

Multiply the

The

In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

**Stonebridge**)In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties at A Level.

__You have two values, each with an absolute ± uncertainty.__**1. If you add or subtract the two (or more) values**to get a final valueThe absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

**2. If you multiply**__one value with absolute uncertainty__by a constantThe absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

**3. If you**

You add the % uncertainties in the two values to get the % uncertainty in the final value.__multiply or divide two (or more) values,__each with an uncertaintyeg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

**x**2.0 ± 0.1 mmThis is

5.0 ±

**2%**x 2.0 ±**5%**Result

10.0 ±

**7%**

This is 10.0±**0.7**(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

**4. If you square a value**You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

**If you cube a value**you multiply the % uncertainty by 3etc

**The general rule is**Multiply the

**% uncertainty**by the**index**.**What happens to % uncertainty when I multiply by a constant?**The

**% uncertainty**doesn't change. The**absolute uncertainty**is multiplied by the constant. (see 2 above)In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

**still 2%**

Note: This is consistent with 3. above.When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

**zero**.So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

0

reply

(Original post by

You might want to add square rooting.

**Zenarthra**)You might want to add square rooting.

**Rule 4**above.

0

reply

Report

#5

Very Nice Thread Stonebridge!

Hopefully should clear up alot of issues people are having

Hopefully should clear up alot of issues people are having

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

eg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

This is

5.0 ±

Result

10.0 ±

(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

**Stonebridge**)**3. If you**

You add the % uncertainties in the two values to get the % uncertainty in the final value.__multiply or divide two (or more) values,__each with an uncertaintyeg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

**x**2.0 ± 0.1 mmThis is

5.0 ±

**2%**x 2.0 ±**5%**

Result

10.0 ±

**7%**

This is 10.0 ±**0.7**mm^{2}(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

I have a problem with this uncertainty for about a year now.

And your post haven't addressed it.

Take this example

10 ± 2 mm

**x**11 ± 3 mm

Consider that its actually 12

**x**14

**-**then it will = 168 = 170 (to 2 sf)

But as according to this rule above the answer should be represented by 110 ± 52. That is the upper bound is 162. So this value lies outside this range and so this rule is false.

Is there something about

*confidence*?

0

reply

(Original post by

Thanks for that!

I have a problem with this uncertainty for about a year now.

And your post haven't addressed it.

Take this example

10 ± 2 mm

Consider that its actually 12

But as according to this rule above the answer should be represented by 110 ± 52. That is the upper bound is 162. So this value lies outside this range and so this rule is false.

Is there something about

**RoyalBlue7**)Thanks for that!

I have a problem with this uncertainty for about a year now.

And your post haven't addressed it.

Take this example

10 ± 2 mm

**x**11 ± 3 mmConsider that its actually 12

**x**14**-**then it will = 168 = 170 (to 2 sf)But as according to this rule above the answer should be represented by 110 ± 52. That is the upper bound is 162. So this value lies outside this range and so this rule is false.

Is there something about

*confidence*?There's no problem.

The rule for adding percentages (or fractional uncertainties) is derived (from calculus)

**assuming the uncertainty is small**.

In this example the uncertainties are rather large (20% and 27% giving a total of 47%) which means this method will produce a different result from the one where you take those upper and lower bounds. As the % uncertainty gets smaller, the results will agree more closely with your other method. You really need to keep % uncertainties below about 10% to keep it valid. 47% is way too high.

The % uncertainty formula is a quick way of finding your total uncertainty and is a lot quicker than using upper and lower bounds, especially when there are many terms to include in the total error.

The only limitation is that you need the uncertainties to be relatively small. Even so, it still gives a good idea of what uncertainties you have in your experiment.

BTW. If you have an experiment with an uncertainty of 47% the fact that the % error formula gives a different result is the least of your worries.

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

There's no problem.

The rule for adding percentages (or fractional uncertainties) is derived (from calculus)

In this example the uncertainties are rather large (20% and 27% giving a total of 47%) which means this method will produce a different result from the one where you take those upper and lower bounds. As the % uncertainty gets smaller, the results will agree more closely with your other method. You really need to keep % uncertainties below about 10% to keep it valid. 47% is way too high.

The % uncertainty formula is a quick way of finding your total uncertainty and is a lot quicker than using upper and lower bounds, especially when there are many terms to include in the total error.

The only limitation is that you need the uncertainties to be relatively small. Even so, it still gives a good idea of what uncertainties you have in your experiment.

BTW. If you have an experiment with an uncertainty of 47% the fact that the % error formula gives a different result is the least of your worries.

**Stonebridge**)There's no problem.

The rule for adding percentages (or fractional uncertainties) is derived (from calculus)

**assuming the uncertainty is small**.In this example the uncertainties are rather large (20% and 27% giving a total of 47%) which means this method will produce a different result from the one where you take those upper and lower bounds. As the % uncertainty gets smaller, the results will agree more closely with your other method. You really need to keep % uncertainties below about 10% to keep it valid. 47% is way too high.

The % uncertainty formula is a quick way of finding your total uncertainty and is a lot quicker than using upper and lower bounds, especially when there are many terms to include in the total error.

The only limitation is that you need the uncertainties to be relatively small. Even so, it still gives a good idea of what uncertainties you have in your experiment.

BTW. If you have an experiment with an uncertainty of 47% the fact that the % error formula gives a different result is the least of your worries.

0

reply

(Original post by

Thanks...guess that clears it now

**RoyalBlue7**)Thanks...guess that clears it now

Good question; and a point that needed further explanation.

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties at A Level.

The absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

eg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

This is

5.0 ±

Result

10.0 ±

(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

etc

Multiply the

The

In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

Let's take an example. Assume you have all the uncertainties in the values in the formula and we want the uncertainty in

s = ut + ½at²

Step 1.

Add the % uncertainties in

Step 2.

Multiply the % uncertainty in

Convert those % uncertainties to absolute uncertainties in

Step 4.

Add the absolute ± uncertainties in

**Stonebridge**)In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties at A Level.

__You have two values, each with an absolute ± uncertainty.__**1. If you add or subtract the two (or more) values**to get a final valueThe absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

**2. If you multiply**__one value with absolute uncertainty__by a constantThe absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

**3. If you**

You add the % uncertainties in the two values to get the % uncertainty in the final value.__multiply or divide two (or more) values,__each with an uncertaintyeg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

**x**2.0 ± 0.1 mmThis is

5.0 ±

**2%**x 2.0 ±**5%**

Result

10.0 ±

**7%**

This is 10.0 ±**0.7**mm^{2}(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

**4. If you square a value**You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

**If you cube a value**you multiply the % uncertainty by 3etc

**The general rule is**Multiply the

**% uncertainty**by the**index**.**What happens to % uncertainty when I multiply by a constant?**The

**% uncertainty**doesn't change. The**absolute uncertainty**is multiplied by the constant. (see 2 above)In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

**still 2%**

Note: This is consistent with 3. above.When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

**zero**.So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

**What if the formula I use to calculate my final value has both adding**__and__multiplication/division.Let's take an example. Assume you have all the uncertainties in the values in the formula and we want the uncertainty in

**s**s = ut + ½at²

Step 1.

Add the % uncertainties in

**u**and**t**to find the % uncertainty in**ut**Step 2.

Multiply the % uncertainty in

**t**by 2 (Rule 4 above) and add it to the % uncertainty in**a**to find the % uncertainty in**½at²**

Step 3.Convert those % uncertainties to absolute uncertainties in

**ut**and in**½at²**Step 4.

Add the absolute ± uncertainties in

**ut**and**½at²**found in 3. above to get the absolute uncertainty in the final value of**s**I didn't understand aiii

Can you actually explain it to me by linking to the rules please. Many thanks!

0

reply

Report

#11

So if i had to work out the %uncertainty for 2D, would i multiply the % uncertainty of D by two

0

reply

(Original post by

Hello there

I didn't understand aiii

Can you actually explain it to me by linking to the rules please. Many thanks!

**Daniel Atieh**)Hello there

I didn't understand aiii

Can you actually explain it to me by linking to the rules please. Many thanks!

you are multiplying the value by a constant. The constant here is 1/10

That's equivalent to dividing by 10

if you divide by a constant you also divide the absolute uncertainty by that constant.

0

reply

(Original post by

So if i had to work out the %uncertainty for 2D, would i multiply the % uncertainty of D by two

**azar316**)So if i had to work out the %uncertainty for 2D, would i multiply the % uncertainty of D by two

you are multiplying the value by a constant.

0

reply

Report

#14

(Original post by

It's rule 2.

you are multiplying the value by a constant. The constant here is 1/10

That's equivalent to dividing by 10

if you divide by a constant you also divide the absolute uncertainty by that constant.

**Stonebridge**)It's rule 2.

you are multiplying the value by a constant. The constant here is 1/10

That's equivalent to dividing by 10

if you divide by a constant you also divide the absolute uncertainty by that constant.

0

reply

Report

#16

I know logarithms are used in A level physics (although I can't remember if uncertainty calculations are required for them), so it may be wise to put a section in on them, as most 'standard' methods don't work (like as adding absolute or fractional uncertainties in quadrature).

The way I was taught to do them easily and with reasonable accuracy is using the minimum and maximum values.

So say you have an equation and you measure x to be then you may be asked for value and uncertainty of y.

The value is straightforward: , but the uncertainty isn't immediately obvious, as gives highly nonsensical results.

Instead consider the range of values "7" could really be - it may vary from 6.9 to 7.1, so the minimum that can be is and the maximum is . These should give you a range of values of around 0.01 rather than 2 (which is what you get if you take the logarithm of the uncertainty).

You can write this more generally as

Or you may choose to have the plus and the minus separate as halving the difference between the extremes is not quite right, but is a good easy approximation.

That's how I do most of my uncertainties these days, but I know that A levels can be very rigid and only accept the awarding body's chosen method so it may not be considered "correct".

The way I was taught to do them easily and with reasonable accuracy is using the minimum and maximum values.

So say you have an equation and you measure x to be then you may be asked for value and uncertainty of y.

The value is straightforward: , but the uncertainty isn't immediately obvious, as gives highly nonsensical results.

Instead consider the range of values "7" could really be - it may vary from 6.9 to 7.1, so the minimum that can be is and the maximum is . These should give you a range of values of around 0.01 rather than 2 (which is what you get if you take the logarithm of the uncertainty).

You can write this more generally as

Or you may choose to have the plus and the minus separate as halving the difference between the extremes is not quite right, but is a good easy approximation.

That's how I do most of my uncertainties these days, but I know that A levels can be very rigid and only accept the awarding body's chosen method so it may not be considered "correct".

0

reply

Report

#17

(Original post by

...

**Manitude**)...

Posted from TSR Mobile

0

reply

Report

#18

**Stonebridge**)

It's rule 2.

you are multiplying the value by a constant. The constant here is 1/10

That's equivalent to dividing by 10

if you divide by a constant you also divide the absolute uncertainty by that constant.

Can you please look at this thread and help me with my question: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2674025

Will be really appreciated!

0

reply

Report

#19

**Stonebridge**)

In view of the fact that this question is being asked again and again on this forum, and to save me time posting the same answer again and again, this is a summary of how you combine uncertainties at A Level.

__You have two values, each with an absolute ± uncertainty.__**1. If you add or subtract the two (or more) values**to get a final value

The absolute uncertainty in the final value is the sum of the uncertainties.

eg.

5.0 ± 0.1 mm + 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 7.0 ± 0.2 mm

5.0 ± 0.1 mm - 2.0 ± 0.1 mm = 3.0 ± 0.2 mm

**2. If you multiply**

__one value with absolute uncertainty__by a constantThe absolute uncertainty is also multiplied by the same constant.

eg.

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The constant can be any number. eg Pi

**3. If you**

You add the % uncertainties in the two values to get the % uncertainty in the final value.

__multiply or divide two (or more) values,__each with an uncertaintyeg

5.0 ± 0.1 mm

**x**2.0 ± 0.1 mm

This is

5.0 ±

**2%**x 2.0 ±

**5%**

Result

10.0 ±

**7%**

This is 10.0 ±

**0.7**mm

^{2}

(0.7 is 7% of 10.0)

**4. If you square a value**

You multiply the % uncertainty by 2

**If you cube a value**you multiply the % uncertainty by 3

etc

**The general rule is**

Multiply the

**% uncertainty**by the

**index**.

**What happens to % uncertainty when I multiply by a constant?**

The

**% uncertainty**doesn't change. The

**absolute uncertainty**is multiplied by the constant. (see 2 above)

In the example given above we multiplied 5.0 ± 0.1 by a constant, 2

2 x (5.0 ± 0.1 mm ) = 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

The absolute uncertainty is multiplied by 2.

The original % uncertainty was 5.0 ± 2%

In the final value of 10.0 ± 0.2 mm

the % uncertainty is

**still 2%**

Note: This is consistent with 3. above.

When you multiply a value by a constant, it is assumed the constant has no uncertainty. We do not associate an uncertainty with the value of Pi or the number 2, for example. So they have a % uncertainty of

**zero**.

So when you multiply the value by the constant and add the % uncertainties, there is only the % uncertainty in the value itself and zero in the constant. Result: no change in % uncertainty.

**What if the formula I use to calculate my final value has both adding**

__and__multiplication/division.Let's take an example. Assume you have all the uncertainties in the values in the formula and we want the uncertainty in

**s**

s = ut + ½at²

Step 1.

Add the % uncertainties in

**u**and

**t**to find the % uncertainty in

**ut**

Step 2.

Multiply the % uncertainty in

**t**by 2 (Rule 4 above) and add it to the % uncertainty in

**a**to find the % uncertainty in

**½at²**

Step 3.

Convert those % uncertainties to absolute uncertainties in

**ut**and in

**½at²**

Step 4.

Add the absolute ± uncertainties in

**ut**and

**½at²**found in 3. above to get the absolute uncertainty in the final value of

**s**

In step 3 of finding the absolute uncertainty in 1/2 a t^2, you mean multiplying the whole"1/2at^2" by the percentage uncertainty or just multiply the percentage uncertainty by at^2? why ? sorry for asking this . It seems silly but i really want to clear my concept. Thank you!

also for percentage uncertainty , does significant figures matter?

AND please , can you please help with the question in that website? thank you !

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2672144

0

reply

(Original post by

In step 3 of finding the absolute uncertainty in 1/2 a t^2, you mean multiplying the whole"1/2at^2" by the percentage uncertainty or just multiply the percentage uncertainty by at^2? why ? sorry for asking this . It seems silly but i really want to clear my concept. Thank you!

also for percentage uncertainty , does significant figures matter?

AND please , can you please help with the question in that website? thank you !

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2672144

**Lamalam**)In step 3 of finding the absolute uncertainty in 1/2 a t^2, you mean multiplying the whole"1/2at^2" by the percentage uncertainty or just multiply the percentage uncertainty by at^2? why ? sorry for asking this . It seems silly but i really want to clear my concept. Thank you!

also for percentage uncertainty , does significant figures matter?

AND please , can you please help with the question in that website? thank you !

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2672144

^{2}

1. find the % uncertainty as I explained.

2. Then multiply the actual value you have calculated for ½at

^{2}by (the % uncertainty / 100). This is how you find actual uncertainty from % uncertainty for any value.

Normally % uncertainties are expressed to the nearest %. Never 4.8% for example. Call it 5%

0

reply

X

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top