Why is zoophilia condemned and homosexuality not?

This is about a human raping an animal, though. Also, an animal initiating a sexual situation with a human, which is not "rife" whatsoever, and animals having sex with other species, which is also not common, is not "rape." An animal is not processing the situation thinking of abusing a human, unlike the other way around.

What about a pubescent child? (Like me).

There is no such thing as a natural negative reaction towards homosexuality. That is not in nature and therefore unnatural, especially since many heterosexuals do not have this reaction. It's a disorder of the mind.

Do you think there is a parallel between zoophilia and heterosexuality?

2. Both zoophilia and homosexuality are a sexuality, rather than a fetish.

Personally, as long as the animal isn't in distress or pain then I've no problem with bestiality. Making it illegal is just moralising by an unaffected third party. Personally, as an heterosexual male, I find the idea of two men screwing to be just as naturally repulsive as interspecies sex but as long as it isn't hurting anyone, human or otherwise, then I say they should be allowed to do what they want without the law intervening.

Whoa...

So what you're saying is that anyone has any rational objection to homosexuality is themselves a sufferer of a mental condition? You're just as bad as the homophobes.

How do you know that an animal isn't in pain or in distress? You can't know. They can't tell you, and they won't sit there and cry. Having lived on a farm you will know that sometimes they will react, sometimes they won't.

And why not apply the same standard to people then? If someone has sex with a child and they don't object (perhaps because they're confused and terrified) then by your logic they've consented?

But that isn't showing consent, or a will, to have sex with the person.
Dogs naturally hump anything! Pillows, other dogs, shoes, etc etc. Doesn't mean they want sex with the object / thing.

I read about a guy who had sex with a wild dolphin - he worked with dolphins so he knew a lot about them, so he could tell that the female dolphin was horny. And the female initiated the sex. I think that there are few cases where it's okay, but there are cases, it just requires the human to have a large amount of knowledge of that particular animal.

Y..Huh?

Seriously?

Firstly, how would you know the animal is consenting?

There is no argument for homosexuality. It just is, some guys like other guys and some girls like other girls.

The difference is that you can be sure homosexuality is between to consenting parties. A man sleeping with a sheep is wrong because the sheep has no idea about love or morals or whatever. Its just getting ****ed.

I know that an animal initiating sex with a human is not rife, although it is not unheard of.

Animals can rape eachother - if one wants to get away, and the other forces sex, that is rape. And imo rape is wrong, obviously, including a human raping an animal.

But what's the point of the law, if technically it's "OK" to break it?

I read about a guy who had sex with a wild dolphin - he worked with dolphins so he knew a lot about them, so he could tell that the female dolphin was horny. And the female initiated the sex. I think that there are few cases where it's okay, but there are cases, it just requires the human to have a large amount of knowledge of that particular animal.

There are also cases of people enjoying having themselves cut apart and eaten .. random 'one-off' cases doesn't make it right.

So at 15, it's OK
At 14, it's OK
At 13, it's OK
At 12, it's OK
At 11, it's not

Why isn't the age of consent 12 then?

Uhm... Zoophilia isn't a sexuality. It's a fetish...