I was just wondering, if i had an ideal voltmeter across a capacitor with a resistor connected in series with it.
Then i had the same capacitor with the same resistor but instead i used an unideal voltmeter, how would the voltages with respect to time be different?
And also how would i create a circuit that could charge 2 capacitors separately and discharge them through the same resistor?
Would it look like this?

Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 02052014 23:18

Pessimisterious
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to Pessimisterious
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 2
 03052014 01:37
(Original post by Zenarthra)
I was just wondering, if i had an ideal voltmeter across a capacitor with a resistor connected in series with it.
Then i had the same capacitor with the same resistor but instead i used an unideal voltmeter, how would the voltages with respect to time be different?
And also how would i create a circuit that could charge 2 capacitors separately and discharge them through the same resistor?
Would it look like this?
Consider the extreme case where the the voltmeter is so bad that it essentially has no resistance and the current just flows right through it. This would be a short circuit, meaning the current would take that path without giving much energy at all to the resistor, which would mean overall the voltage would remain high for longer.
The circuit you've drawn wouldn't work. It would charge the capacitors, but when you close the switch to let them discharge, the positive charge on the plates will have no way of flowing round to the other side.
Have you done simple harmonic motion yet? Capacitors can actually be considered as SHM systems. When you let them discharge, the charge oscillates from positive, around the circuit, to negative, and back again, continuously until the energy is dissipated. So as you can see in your circuit diagram, there is no way for the charge to oscillate from the positive plates around to the negative plates  it's all just stored on one side and then stays there.
I've attached a circuit diagram that I think would work for what you wanted.

Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 03052014 02:11
(Original post by Pessimisterious)
The circuit with the nonideal voltmeter will have less resistance so I presume the change of voltage would be slower, since the energy can flow more freely in the circuit without being damped quite so much.
Consider the extreme case where the the voltmeter is so bad that it essentially has no resistance and the current just flows right through it. This would be a short circuit, meaning the current would take that path without giving much energy at all to the resistor, which would mean overall the voltage would remain high for longer.
The circuit you've drawn wouldn't work. It would charge the capacitors, but when you close the switch to let them discharge, the positive charge on the plates will have no way of flowing round to the other side.
Have you done simple harmonic motion yet? Capacitors can actually be considered as SHM systems. When you let them discharge, the charge oscillates from positive, around the circuit, to negative, and back again, continuously until the energy is dissipated. So as you can see in your circuit diagram, there is no way for the charge to oscillate from the positive plates around to the negative plates  it's all just stored on one side and then stays there.
I've attached a circuit diagram that I think would work for what you wanted.
And if so how?
And yes i have done SHM,thanks for good explanation!
Thanks!Last edited by Zenarthra; 03052014 at 02:19. 
Pessimisterious
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to Pessimisterious
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 03052014 02:54
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Hey thanks for the detail, is it possible to have an arrangment so that one capacitor discharges quicker than the other through the same resistor?
And if so how?
And yes i have done SHM,thanks for good explanation!
Thanks!
Hmmm, no I don't think it would be possible to have one discharging quicker than the other, at least not in the case of a simple circuit like we're dealing with here.
My reasoning behind this is based on kirchoff's current law. Even if one of the capacitors has a much greater capacity than the other, the currents from each capacitor still meet at a single junction when they go towards the resistor. If the flow of charge from one of the capacitors is much higher, it'll just push against the other capacitor and stop it from discharging, until they're both of equal charge and so can start to discharge together with equal current. Hence no capacitor will discharge faster than the other.
An interesting analogy would be that of when you hold a ruler flat at its edges on the palms of your hands. If you draw your hands slowly towards the middle, you'll notice that only one of your hands slides, until the friction balances and the other hand slides instead. Eventually you'll have moved your hands to the centre of the ruler and they will have both got there at the same time, regardless of whether you changed the speed of one hand or the other or whatever. The same thing happens for discharging capacitors if they both come in at the same junction to the same resistor. The one with the stronger current 'goes first', until it loses power and the other one gets to 'push in front'. It's a strange analogy but hopefully it makes sense! 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 5
 03052014 12:30
(Original post by Pessimisterious)
Cool, glad you were happy with it.
Hmmm, no I don't think it would be possible to have one discharging quicker than the other, at least not in the case of a simple circuit like we're dealing with here.
My reasoning behind this is based on kirchoff's current law. Even if one of the capacitors has a much greater capacity than the other, the currents from each capacitor still meet at a single junction when they go towards the resistor. If the flow of charge from one of the capacitors is much higher, it'll just push against the other capacitor and stop it from discharging, until they're both of equal charge and so can start to discharge together with equal current. Hence no capacitor will discharge faster than the other.
An interesting analogy would be that of when you hold a ruler flat at its edges on the palms of your hands. If you draw your hands slowly towards the middle, you'll notice that only one of your hands slides, until the friction balances and the other hand slides instead. Eventually you'll have moved your hands to the centre of the ruler and they will have both got there at the same time, regardless of whether you changed the speed of one hand or the other or whatever. The same thing happens for discharging capacitors if they both come in at the same junction to the same resistor. The one with the stronger current 'goes first', until it loses power and the other one gets to 'push in front'. It's a strange analogy but hopefully it makes sense!
I think 2 weeks ago we did an experiment with 2 capacitors, i forgot the arrangement but there was only 1 resistor and a voltmeter.
We charged the first capacitor to 3V and then measured the discharge time, it was quite quick.
Then we charged the other capacitor to 3V and discharged, this time it took longer for the voltage to drop.
Also it seemed to go down really slow something like this.
3V => 2.8 = > 2.7 => 2.6 => 2.5
Till it got to about 2V and it was hardly dropping.
Do you have any suggestions of what happened here? 
Pessimisterious
 Follow
 3 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to Pessimisterious
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 03052014 13:59
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Ahh ok.
I think 2 weeks ago we did an experiment with 2 capacitors, i forgot the arrangement but there was only 1 resistor and a voltmeter.
We charged the first capacitor to 3V and then measured the discharge time, it was quite quick.
Then we charged the other capacitor to 3V and discharged, this time it took longer for the voltage to drop.
Also it seemed to go down really slow something like this.
3V => 2.8 = > 2.7 => 2.6 => 2.5
Till it got to about 2V and it was hardly dropping.
Do you have any suggestions of what happened here?
Probably you used one capacitor and discharged it, then maybe added the second capacitor in parallel, which would increase the overall capacitance so the voltage decays at a slower rate.
Have you learned the equation yet?
V=V_{0}e^{t/RC}
By increasing the capacitance you have a larger 'C' so the voltage will decay less. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 7
 03052014 17:41
(Original post by Pessimisterious)
Yep, it's the exponential decay of the charge.
Probably you used one capacitor and discharged it, then maybe added the second capacitor in parallel, which would increase the overall capacitance so the voltage decays at a slower rate.
Have you learned the equation yet?
V=V_{0}e^{t/RC}
By increasing the capacitance you have a larger 'C' so the voltage will decay less.
Would the graphs for a non ideal voltmeter look something like this?
Would this be the correct explanation, consider the bottom diagram in the attached,
The current is split 3 times, for first capacitor for second capacitor and for voltmeter.
Total current through circuit is given by V=IR
Voltage across each component in parallel is same.
Since current is drawn away from the other capacitors then charging the capacitors would take longer as Q=It for the same amount of charge transfer t would have to be greater since I is less now across each capacitor.
And for Discharging V=V_{0}e^{t/RC}
So if i record V=3 t=0, V=2.5 t=2, V=2 t=2
I know it wouldnt because of the exponential decay formula, but would the time just be greater eg. V=3 t=0, V=2.5 t=5, V=2 t=8
What would happen to these values and why?
Thanks! 
uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 8
 03052014 19:47
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Ahh yes ofcourse.
Would the graphs for a non ideal voltmeter look something like this?
The CR time constant woud therefore also be infinite. i.e. all of the charge would remain on the capacitor and not discharge via the voltmeter.
The ideal V/t curve would be a flat line of magnitide V_{c} and t= infinity. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 9
 03052014 20:05
(Original post by uberteknik)
An ideal voltmeter has infinite resistance since it should not draw any current from the circuit to be measured.
The CR time constant woud therefore also be infinite. i.e. all of the charge would remain on the capacitor and not discharge via the voltmeter.
The ideal V/t curve would be a flat line of magnitide V_{c} and t= infinity.
I drew two graphs, 1 for a capacitor discharging through a resistor which has an ideal voltmeter across it.
And i then drew a graph for the same capacitor discharging through the same resistor which has a non ideal voltmeter across it.
How would the values of V shown on the voltmeter for discharging be different from the ideal voltmeter readings?
Perhaps i wasn't so clear, sorry.
Thanks! 
uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 10
 03052014 20:46
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Im sorry i dont understand.
I drew two graphs, 1 for a capacitor discharging through a resistor which has an ideal voltmeter across it.
And i then drew a graph for the same capacitor discharging through the same resistor which has a non ideal voltmeter across it.
How would the values of V shown on the voltmeter for discharging be different from the ideal voltmeter readings?
Perhaps i wasn't so clear, sorry.
Thanks!
So in the first case the ideal voltmeter follows the decaying voltage across the capacitor since the resistor is in parallel with the capacitor. (i.e. both the resistor and capacitor are connected at the same points and therefore the same voltage potential must exist across both. This is a bit confusing because at first glance a lot of people think the resistor is in series because of the current flow in the conductors.
V_{cap} = V_{r}_{es }= V_{0}.(e^{}^{t/CR}); time constant = CR
In the case where the voltmeter is nonideal, it therefore has a finite resistance. Since this is also in parallel with the resistor, the combined resistance of the two is therefore:
R_{parallel} = (R x R_{vm}) / (R + R_{vm})
V_{cap = }V_{res} = V_{0}.(e^{t/CRparallel}), time constant = CR_{parallel}
Since R_{parlallel} will always be less than R for a nonideal voltmeter, the time constant will be smaller. Hence the capacitor wil discharge faster.
i.e. the exponential decay in the second graph (nonideal voltmeter) will be steeper than for the ideal voltmeter.Last edited by uberteknik; 03052014 at 21:04. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 11
 03052014 21:18
(Original post by uberteknik)
Ahhh. That makes more sense.
So in the first case the ideal voltmeter follows the decaying voltage across the capacitor since the resistor is in parallel with the capacitor. (i.e. both the resistor and capacitor are connected at the same points and therefore the same voltage potential must exist across both. This is a bit confusing because at first glance a lot of people think the resistor is in series because of the current flow in the conductors.
V_{cap} = V_{r}_{es }= V_{0}.(e^{}^{t/CR}); time constant = CR
In the case where the voltmeter is nonideal, it therefore has a finite resistance. Since this is also in parallel with the resistor, the combined resistance of the two is therefore:
R_{parallel} = (R x R_{vm}) / (R + R_{vm})
V_{cap = }V_{res} = V_{0}.(e^{t/CRparallel}), time constant = CR_{parallel}
Since R_{parlallel} will always be less than R for a nonideal voltmeter, the time constant will be smaller. Hence the capacitor wil discharge faster.
i.e. the exponential decay in the second graph (nonideal voltmeter) will be steeper than for the ideal voltmeter.
So the resistor is in parallel to the capacitors? 
uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 12
 03052014 23:59
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Ahh im talking about discharging through this kind of setup:
So the resistor is in parallel to the capacitors?
All of the components in your diagram are in parallel.
Which is exactly as described in my last post. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 13
 04052014 00:46
(Original post by uberteknik)
Yes.
All of the components in your diagram are in parallel.
Which is exactly as described in my last post.
I never knew it was in parallel to the others.
So the values of V would have a smaller t value?
And the graph would look something like this?

uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 14
 04052014 01:00
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Oh, thank you so much!
I never knew it was in parallel to the others.
So the values of V would have a smaller t value?
And the graph would look something like this?

Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 15
 04052014 01:22
(Original post by uberteknik)
Exactly.
Was this what i said correct?
The current is split 3 times, for first capacitor for second capacitor and for voltmeter.
Total current through circuit is given by V=IR
Voltage across each component in parallel is same.
Since current is drawn away from the other capacitors then charging the capacitors would take longer as Q=It for the same amount of charge transfer t would have to be greater since I is less now across each capacitor.
And also would a graph of Energy stored on a capacitor be 1 or 2 in this picture?
ThankS! 
uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 16
 04052014 01:38
(Original post by Zenarthra)
2 more questions
Was this what i said correct?
The current is split 3 times, for first capacitor for second capacitor and for voltmeter.
Total current through circuit is given by V=IR
Voltage across each component in parallel is same.
Since current is drawn away from the other capacitors then charging the capacitors would take longer as Q=It for the same amount of charge transfer t would have to be greater since I is less now across each capacitor.
And also would a graph of Energy stored on a capacitor be 1 or 2 in this picture?
ThankS!
Total current I = V/R
pd across all parallel components is the same.
Energy stored = 1/2 CV^{2}; the energy profile will therefore follow the same shape curve as the charge. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 04052014 02:23
(Original post by uberteknik)
Before we go any further, can you explain what you are trying to do first?
Total current I = V/R
pd across all parallel components is the same.
Energy stored = 1/2 CV^{2}; the energy profile will therefore follow the same shape curve as the charge.
Im saying that since the voltmeter has finite resistance, it draws current away from the circuit.
The total resistance of the circuit is given by V=IR, I=V/R since V is constant and resistance of the whole circuit decreases, the current in the circuit must increase.
Current is split at the junction, between the two capacitors and the voltmeter.
What im not sure is if the charging time would increase or not, because there is an increase in current but also the current is split between 3 components now.
C=Q/V=It/V
Does the current through the two capacitors increase or decrease as we use a finite resistance voltmeter?
ThankS! 
uberteknik
 Follow
 127 followers
 21 badges
 Send a private message to uberteknik
 Study Helper
Offline21ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 18
 04052014 02:32
(Original post by Zenarthra)
So im trying to explain for a non ideal voltmeter across two capacitors in a parallel setup charging through a resistor also in parallel.
ThankS!
I think you still have a few misconceptions but it's now very late. I will look at this again in the morning and we will try and help you sort them out. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 19
 04052014 11:21
(Original post by uberteknik)
Woah! How does a capacitor charge through a parallel resistor?
I think you still have a few misconceptions but it's now very late. I will look at this again in the morning and we will try and help you sort them out.
I was talking about charging through this resistor and i asked you if this resistor was in parallel to all the other and you said yes. O_O
Sorry, i think im confusing myself. 
Zenarthra
 Follow
 36 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Zenarthra
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 20
 05052014 14:15
(Original post by uberteknik)
Woah! How does a capacitor charge through a parallel resistor?
I think you still have a few misconceptions but it's now very late. I will look at this again in the morning and we will try and help you sort them out.
 1
 2
Related university courses

Theoretical Physics and Applied Mathematics
University of Birmingham

Engineering Physics
Loughborough University

Physics for New Technology
University of Liverpool

Theoretical Physics
University of Sussex

Mathematical and Theoretical Physics
Aberystwyth University

Physics with Astrophysics
Central Lancashire (UCLan)

Mathematics/Physics
Aberystwyth University

Physics (4 years)
University of Nottingham

Physics (Foundation Entry)
Central Lancashire (UCLan)

Physics with Business and Management
Aberystwyth University
see more
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 Notnek
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Quirky Object
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel
 Toastiekid
 CinnamonSmol
 Qer
 The Empire Odyssey
 RedGiant
 Sinnoh