LOL, nice defense. Ok so you sign a contract with a fake name, and pretend you're not liable for the signature as it's fake (which btw you might like to know wont work as a defense for Piggy) - and you try to defend pig saying he was too deep into his fake alias to turn back? HAHA, yeah, try that one in court. Poor piggy, had no choice did he, lol...
In fact, your whole argument seems pretty flawed. If it wasn't for the belligerent manner in which you debate you might almost think you make some sense. Sadly I can just about see through your swearing and implying the person you're talking to if a total moron.
Read your post again in fact, but without the swearing or aggressive attitude. NOW you can see that it's actually completly terrible. How about you reply to this post without using your usual techniques? How about you make a good point? I dares ya, I double dares ya.
*expects a flaming response*
As JonH says, he mixes his swearing etc with decent points, and to his credit this is actually true. Sadly the same cannot be said for you.
So come on, the big issue here seems to be false identity, plus reading PM's that aren't designed for you. What ACTUAL defense is there that goes beyond "OMFG YOU'RE SO **** STUPID YOU *** **** *** PIG DID SO MUCH FOR THE **** SITE YOU *** ***" ... ?
Until Pig says his version, there isn't a defense. So why is it soooo moronic to propse he did anything wrong when the man wont even defend himself?