Do you think people are born gay?

I fail to see how evolution could possibly suggest that when homosexuality has existed for centuries, even before the theory of evolution was put forward.

The process of evolution far outdated the establishment of the corresponding theory. Evolution suggests that our bodies are programmed to procreate - our anatomy suggests intercourse should take place between heterosexual couples only.

Because there are some ignorant people who still have their heads in their ass and think AIDs is a 'gay disease.' As if diseases have brains to think they want to target a specific section of society.

It's not a mix. Are people "born straight?"

Again, we don't know the answer. We will never really know so there's no point saying it's one or the other.

Agreed. Homosexuality is something that just is. It just exists and has done for some time. We don't need to fully understand it

Are people born gay or do you think it is a thing influenced by society?

AIDS is a gay disease, in the UK at least, that's not to say other people can't become infected too.
In terms of immunology and disease, the mode of transmission and late linking of HIV with AIDS just meant that gay men quickly became a good "target" for HIV
Also, there will always be people who have unprotected sex- gay or straight.

The process of evolution far outdated the establishment of the corresponding theory. Evolution suggests that our bodies are programmed to procreate - our anatomy suggests intercourse should take place between heterosexual couples only.

Probability of transmitting or getting affected by hiv is much higher for a homosexual person.
https://endinghiv.org.nz/blog-events/gay-men-hiv-risk
https://www.verywellhealth.com/why-do-gay-men-have-an-increased-risk-of-hiv-3132782

Again, we don't know the answer. We will never really know so there's no point saying it's one or the other.

Why won’t we ever know?

Exactly. Saying that AIDS isn't a gay disease is like saying a certain cancer isn't a smoking disease

AIDS is better understood as a disease of promiscuity not homosexuality per se. Men are generally much more willing to be promiscuous than women are and the 'brake' that straight women represent on straight male sexual behaviour is consequentially missing for gay males.

Evolution is not actually a 'purpose' driven phenomenon but a consequence driven one. There's no underlying intentionality, only variation and natural selection. So, while it's fair to say that the living products of evolution generally are comprised of physiology and behaviour that facilitates successful reproduction that's evidently not universally so and not 'intended' to be universally so either.