Original post by SasutoIn degrees:
When h=1000 I get -0.0009848
When h=10 I get 0.01736...
When h=π I get 0.01744...
When h=0.1 I get 0.01745...
When h=0.01 I get 0.01745...
As h→0, value=π/180 ;and this is how you convert to radians, you multiply by π/180. Not sure if this is relevant...
As h→∞, value=0
In radians:
When h=10 I get -0.05440...
When h=π I get 0
When h=0.1 I get 0.9983...
When h=0.01 I get 0.99998...
As h→0, value=1 and I think this is the most relevant deduction.
As h→∞, value=0
This kinda relates to the small angle approximation idea, right? That sinx≈x.
So, relating back to the original question part c), the assumption that radians is needed should be identified where they say sin(h)/h→1 because for degrees, there's no general value of convergence, or it never equals 1. But in radians, it does when h→0. I seriously hope this is along the right lines.
Man, I feel like I am thinking too much for a 1 marker. But hey, what's maths without the rigour...?