Hi, I'm just wondering when finding the derivative when do you use dy/dx and when do you use the f'(x)= lim h-->0 f(x+h)-f(x) /h
f'(x) and dy/dx are just different notation of the same thing. dy/dx was down to Liebniz and f'(x) was Lagrange. You could go into how f' was developed along with functions and dy/dx was when you thought of y as a variable (which depends on x). Newton used dot (fluxions) and Euler used D.
Edit - as per TypicalNerds post, if youre asking when do you prove a derivative from first principles (the f'(x) part of your question) of when you use standard results to evaulate the derivative, then its pretty much that. Youd use the f'(x) = ... definition when youre asked to show something from first principles. Otherwise youd use the standard stuff (derivative of exponential, power, chain rule, ...).
Hi, I'm just wondering when finding the derivative when do you use dy/dx and when do you use the f'(x)= lim h-->0 f(x+h)-f(x) /h
The formula here is used when the question asks you to prove a derivative from first principles. Though mqb2766 is absolutely right that dy/dx and f’(x) are just alternative ways of representing the derivative of a function
The formula here is used when the question asks you to prove a derivative from first principles. Though mqb2766 is absolutely right that dy/dx and f’(x) are just alternative ways of representing the derivative of a function
You will also often need to use "first principles" if the function has a "split definition". E.g. if f(x)=x2sin(1/x)x=0,f(0)=0 then finding f'(0) basically requires a "first principles" approach.
You will also often need to use "first principles" if the function has a "split definition". E.g. if f(x)=x2sin(1/x)x=0,f(0)=0 then finding f'(0) basically requires a "first principles" approach.
Perhaps, though I was working under the assumption that the OP is doing ordinary A level maths and so they most probably wouldn’t need to consider such a case (though my memory could be terrible and such instances may be covered on the course)