Hello, so we had a tiring exam on 6th as we never had sat an actual exam, it was a very stressing experience but we made it.

Now, the question on i think 13 or 14 cant remember on paper 1 edexcel a level on 2023 june 6.

it was to differentiate sin(x) from first principles, I used a different method where there was no mention of lim->0 source :https://youtu.be/cmBIyKQleWU

It was maths genie, he used a gradient method. What would be your opinion would this method be valid?

Now, the question on i think 13 or 14 cant remember on paper 1 edexcel a level on 2023 june 6.

it was to differentiate sin(x) from first principles, I used a different method where there was no mention of lim->0 source :https://youtu.be/cmBIyKQleWU

It was maths genie, he used a gradient method. What would be your opinion would this method be valid?

You need to take the limit somewhere, as that is the definition of a derivative.

That said, you don't need to write "lim" every line. In the video, the "lim" on every line is replaced by the sentence "as h tends to zero".

It is so key, that if you don't write it, your solution would be incorrect. (For instance, you'd end up claiming sin(x)/x = 1, which is nonsense)

The method is practically the same. It's just a different presentation.

That said, you don't need to write "lim" every line. In the video, the "lim" on every line is replaced by the sentence "as h tends to zero".

It is so key, that if you don't write it, your solution would be incorrect. (For instance, you'd end up claiming sin(x)/x = 1, which is nonsense)

The method is practically the same. It's just a different presentation.

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by tonyiptony

You need to take the limit somewhere, as that is the definition of a derivative.

That said, you don't need to write "lim" every line. In the video, the "lim" on every line is replaced by the sentence "as h tends to zero".

It is so key, that if you don't write it, your solution would be incorrect. (For instance, you'd end up claiming sin(x)/x = 1, which is nonsense)

The method is practically the same. It's just a different presentation.

That said, you don't need to write "lim" every line. In the video, the "lim" on every line is replaced by the sentence "as h tends to zero".

It is so key, that if you don't write it, your solution would be incorrect. (For instance, you'd end up claiming sin(x)/x = 1, which is nonsense)

The method is practically the same. It's just a different presentation.

Yes,

My conclusion was at the end

"As h tends to 0, so does cosh -1/h tends to 0 and sinh/h tends to 1 and we get cosx as required "

Don't want to cause panic and got no idea how it's taught and how they mark but writing something like "d(sin(x))/dx = (sin(x+h) - sin(x)) / h" is not correct if we are being strict. (sin(x+h) - sin(x)) / h approaches the derivative of sin(x) as h->0 but it's not equal to the derivative while it is approaching..

The way it's done in the video is very sloppy.

The way it's done in the video is very sloppy.

Original post by hassassin04

Don't want to cause panic and got no idea how it's taught and how they mark but writing something like "d(sin(x))/dx = (sin(x+h) - sin(x)) / h" is not correct if we are being strict. (sin(x+h) - sin(x)) / h approaches the derivative of sin(x) as h->0 but it's not equal to the derivative while it is approaching..

The way it's done in the video is very sloppy.

The way it's done in the video is very sloppy.

here's what he did, i don't know if this method is correct or not but

(x, sinx) , (x+h, sinx + h)

d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x

you can simplify the bottom bit as just h because we have a positive and negative x

and then we use sin(a + b) formula then we can factorise cosx and sinx

we end up with sinh/h * cox + (cosh - 1)/h * (sin x) then we can use of the limits

that as h tends to 0 so does (cosh - 1)/h = 0 and sinh/h tends to 1 and we get cosx because cosx * 1 is cosx

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by Zephyr0221

here's what he did, i don't know if this method is correct or not but

(x, sinx) , (x+h, sinx + h)

d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x

(x, sinx) , (x+h, sinx + h)

d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x

As hassassin04 said, this is incorrect. It should be

\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} \sin x = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{\sin(x+h)-\sin(x)}{h}

[To be clear: the important difference is that a limit is involved in the RHS, the rest is just cosmetic].

Original post by Zephyr0221

here's what he did, i don't know if this method is correct or not but

(x, sinx) , (x+h, sinx + h)

d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x

you can simplify the bottom bit as just h because we have a positive and negative x

and then we use sin(a + b) formula then we can factorise cosx and sinx

we end up with sinh/h * cox + (cosh - 1)/h * (sin x) then we can use of the limits

that as h tends to 0 so does (cosh - 1)/h = 0 and sinh/h tends to 1 and we get cosx because cosx * 1 is cosx

(x, sinx) , (x+h, sinx + h)

d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x

you can simplify the bottom bit as just h because we have a positive and negative x

and then we use sin(a + b) formula then we can factorise cosx and sinx

we end up with sinh/h * cox + (cosh - 1)/h * (sin x) then we can use of the limits

that as h tends to 0 so does (cosh - 1)/h = 0 and sinh/h tends to 1 and we get cosx because cosx * 1 is cosx

I understand, my issue is with writing "d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x". The derivative of sin(x) is the limit of sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x.

If one wanted to be lazy and exclude the lim in each equality, then a better way would be to simply write

sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x = ... = the final expression and then say that d(sin(x))/dx = lim the final expression = cos(x) while giving a justification for the final equality (follows from using well-known limit results).

(edited 11 months ago)

Original post by hassassin04

I understand, my issue is with writing "d/dx = sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x". The derivative of sin(x) is the limit of sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x.

If one wanted to be lazy and exclude the lim in each equality, then a better way would be to simply write

sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x = ... = the final expression and then say that d(sin(x))/dx = lim the final expression = cos(x) while giving a justification for the final equality (follows from using well-known limit results).

If one wanted to be lazy and exclude the lim in each equality, then a better way would be to simply write

sin(x + h) - sin(x)/ x + h -x = ... = the final expression and then say that d(sin(x))/dx = lim the final expression = cos(x) while giving a justification for the final equality (follows from using well-known limit results).

thanks... it makes sense now

Original post by DFranklin

As hassassin04 said, this is incorrect. It should be

\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} \sin x = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{\sin(x+h)-\sin(x)}{h}

\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} \sin x = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{\sin(x+h)-\sin(x)}{h}

[To be clear: the important difference is that a limit is involved in the RHS, the rest is just cosmetic].

So, we can conclude the method shown on the video is incorrect? and the tutor should have added lim ->0 on RHS correct?

Original post by Zephyr0221

So, we can conclude the method shown on the video is incorrect? and the tutor should have added lim ->0 on RHS correct?

Yes. That said, it's really not a big deal. If he just hadn't written the $\dfrac{d}{d\theta} =$ bit, everything else is valid (the thing that's unequivocally wrong is to have the derivative on one side and not have the limit on the other). And then how much can you reasonably take off for putting the d/d theta = ...?

IMNSHO, leaving out the h->0 should only cost 1 mark - the "interesting bit" is manipulating the "(f(x+h) - f(x))/h" bit, not putting in lim h->0.

Original post by DFranklin

Yes. That said, it's really not a big deal. If he just hadn't written the $\dfrac{d}{d\theta} =$ bit, everything else is valid (the thing that's unequivocally wrong is to have the derivative on one side and not have the limit on the other). And then how much can you reasonably take off for putting the d/d theta = ...?

IMNSHO, leaving out the h->0 should only cost 1 mark - the "interesting bit" is manipulating the "(f(x+h) - f(x))/h" bit, not putting in lim h->0.

IMNSHO, leaving out the h->0 should only cost 1 mark - the "interesting bit" is manipulating the "(f(x+h) - f(x))/h" bit, not putting in lim h->0.

Alright, so I will leave an email to Maths Genie about it. As it could mislead or potentially student may lose marks. Thanks for the clarification.

- The derivative
- Edexcel A-level Mathematics Paper 1 [6th June 2023] Unofficial Markscheme
- Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 1 (9MA0 01) - 6th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- OCR A-level Mathematics A Paper 1 (H240/01) - 6th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- WJEC Unit 1 Maths As Level Discussion 15 May 2024
- Edexcel A-level Further Mathematics Paper 2 (9FM0 02) - 5th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- OCR A level Further Maths Core Pure 1 - 22 May 2024 Exam chat
- Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 2: Pure Maths 2 9MA0 02 - 14 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat]
- [16th may 2024] edexcel AS level pure maths
- OCR A-level Mathematics A Paper 2 (H240/02) - 13th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- Help urgent integration
- OCR A Level Mathematics MEI Pure maths & comprehension H640/03 - 21 Jun 2022 [Chat]
- Discrete maths questions
- L'Hôpital's question with limit
- Edexcel A-level Further Mathematics Paper 1 (9FM0 01) - 22nd May 2024 [Exam Chat]
- 2023 STEP 3 Math
- Temperature cooling function
- AQA A Level Mathematics Paper 3 (7357/3) - 20th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- AQA A Level Mathematics Paper 3 7357/3 - 21 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat]
- Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 2 (9MA0 02) - 13th June 2023 [Exam Chat]

Last reply 1 week ago

Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 2 unofficial mark scheme correct me if wrongMaths

72

Last reply 1 week ago

Edexcel A Level Mathematics Paper 2 unofficial mark scheme correct me if wrongMaths

72