I thought the comprehension was quite challenging. It took me a good amount of time to even answer "what is a Maser and how does it work" without simply copying from the passage. The calculations on the comprehension took me a while to get a grip on too, though my final answer (where they gave data), matched my answer to the previous q (within the uncertainty) so I think that's promising???
Thought the nuclear stuff was fine. Was unsure how much to write for q1 so probably overdid it but oh well. They reused the q about the BE/nuc curve from a past paper so thought that was fine too. The gas stuff was a little tricky though I thought there were lots of easy marks to pick up.
I liked the 6 mark QER. Talked about the first law of thermo and how ∆U =Q since the volume was constant, so U increased. Then linked that to U=3/2nRT and said hence T increases. The pressure bit came up in a past paper too. Talked about the collisions between molecules and walls , linked to N2L & N3L, then P=F/A.
Circular motion was interesting. I guessed they'd throw a practical style q in there. I made sure to fill in the table of results to 2s.f. like all the other columns... I suspect this may have been overlooked by some people. My value of g was 10.1 so I wrote 10m/s² down, sticking to 2sf. The proof style qs in this section were pretty trivial. Firstly F = 0.01v²/R , then T = 0.09g. Equating both as 0.01v²/R = 0.09g lead to the answer.
The pendulum question was a little spicy and set SHM in a different context to past papers. That minor arc proof is in the wjec textbook though it simply states "resolving the weight force along the minor arc gives -mgsin(x)" so I'm not too sure how they're awarding 3 marks for this. The second proof of acceleration was again a trivial one. -mgsin(x) = ma
sin(x) = s/l from the diagram and using the approximation x ≈ s/l , rearranging lead to the result easily. I said this was in agreement with SHM definition (I gave the definition), likened it to a= -ω²x where
ω² = g/l in our equation. The final bit almost caught me out as I felt the question was purposefully vague/ambiguous. Using x=Asin(ωt) I calculated the time taken to reach max amplitude. This was ¼ of the period calculated earlier so was in agreement.
I may have missed a question out from this? How did you guys find it?
Posted from TSR Mobile