The (normal) distribution of X (original population) is different from the distribution associated with the sample mean, Xbar, where you take a random sample of size N from the population and estimate the population mean (you assume you know the population standard deviation). If you take different random samples of size N, each time you'll get a different estimate of the mean, hence there is a (normal) distribution associated the mean estimate. The mean of the mean estimates is the mean of the original population, but the distributions are not the same because the standard deviations are different.
As a simple thought experiment, if you took a single sample (N=1) and used that as the mean estimate, then the sample mean distribution and the population distribution would indeed be the same.
If you took a random sample of size N=1000000...., the estimate of the population mean should be excellent (reliable, little spread) and the associated distribution would be a near zero width "spike" (a very thin but very high normal distribution) centered on the population mean, again as should be clear from the sample mean standard deviation which is the population standard deviation divided by sqrt(N).
For values of N inbetween these two extreme cases, youd expect that the uncertainty (standard deviation) in the sample mean estimate decreases as you increase N because youre using more data to estimate the mean. This is what the divide by sqrt(N) represents in the sample mean standard deviation formula.
So they are indeed different distributions for the sample mean and the original population. A bit more detail in
https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Statistics/Book%3A_Introductory_Statistics_(Shafer_and_Zhang)/06%3A_Sampling_Distributions/6.02%3A_The_Sampling_Distribution_of_the_Sample_Mean#:~:text=If%20the%20population%20is%20normal,n%20is%20the%20sample%20size.