So, a ****ing first year goldsmiths BA STUDENT (AHAHAHHAHAHAHAH) is going to evaluate my work based on his/hers vast life and academic experience? (and, of course, they will be very grown up about it and put away jealous infantile feelings and do a very professional and informed evaluation, OF COURSE, BECAUSE THEY ARE SO EXPERIENCED AND LIVED)
Oh man, I feel so stupid for applying for this place. I feel like apologizing to my work for submitting it for such eyes.
This interview consisted of an obviously unqualified person so I won't even count that. The other two were polite and asked me basic questions and when I answered they would ask new questions which answers were already embodied in my previous statements, which obviously led me to believe they weren't the most enlightened, sophisticated minds. But it went super smooth, I was so relaxed and in control because, honestly, i don't give a ****.
Slade tutors on the other hand, I could tell that they completely listen and understood my answers and weren't doing redundant questions, they seemed capable, educated, experienced people.
BERTIEWALLACE123 I'm starting to be on your anti-goldsmiths boat, dude. I already got a place at chelsea, an interview at kingston and waiting for CSM decision. If Slade doesn't accept me will be CSM a better 2nd choice? Not a fan of the fashion crowd at all but Goldsmiths is out of question obviously. I mean the director of the art department not only is an art critic - probably the most mediocre/ pretentious thing a human being can be labeled as -but a critic of JEFF KOONS- probably the most imbecile artist that ever walked this planet.
p.s. In my inocent, unraped mind I thought the interview was supposed to be an reading of my work, not administrative crap, but in the end they questioned my ability to pay the fees, i was like, **** yeah, capitalism in my ass