Table question II

15 by160 Width.
So 20 by 160 width= 56p

Ahh that’s really cool. I didn’t even think to layout the pattern one on top of the other. What made you think to do that?
Is it because laying it out horizontally wastes a lot of material? As in, horizontally we get 40/60cm and the smallest width available is 100cm.

(Please excuse my drawing, I drew it roughly — I realise I shouldn’t have left any gaps and the shapes should be the same size)

The obvious ways to lay them out are 1*4 and 2*2. The 1*4 could be either length or width ways, so not many to check.
15*152
60*38
76*30
There are also odd arrangements
38*68
...