For this q, https://isaacphysics.org/questions/wire_of_varying_area_sym?board=f289dda7-5340-4dd8-9796-66fb6ebd06bd&stage=a_level

I tried using hint 4 to try and work out the resistance of a small length of the wire and adding these little bits up by integrating but im stuck on how to continue from here - is there a way to integrate this or have I set up the wrong equations.

As always, thank you for your time helping.

I tried using hint 4 to try and work out the resistance of a small length of the wire and adding these little bits up by integrating but im stuck on how to continue from here - is there a way to integrate this or have I set up the wrong equations.

As always, thank you for your time helping.

Working:

(as for notation - i used x as an increase in the length of the wire)

(as for notation - i used x as an increase in the length of the wire)

(edited 2 months ago)

Original post by mosaurlodon

Working:

(as for notation - i used x as an increase in the length of the wire)

(as for notation - i used x as an increase in the length of the wire)

dR = (rho / (pi r^2)) dx

and the radius varies linearly so assuming x goes from 0 to l, then

r = sqrt(A1/pi)*(l-x)/l + sqrt(A2/pi)x/l

so

dr = ... dx

....

The actual integral is fairly simple, the only real complexity is the number of constants kicking around. But it goes without saying that really you need to sketch a cone and think about what the integration variable (x) is and the fact you need to get a dr = ... dx relationship to transform the integral.

(edited 2 months ago)

Ok thank you - so using those equations I managed to get this result - is this correct so far?

EDIT: I reread your response and initially I thought you were saying that the fact its a cone just means that theres a linear relationship, but upon rereading I feel you mean there is another important detail that stems from this?

EDIT: I reread your response and initially I thought you were saying that the fact its a cone just means that theres a linear relationship, but upon rereading I feel you mean there is another important detail that stems from this?

(edited 2 months ago)

Original post by mosaurlodon

Ok thank you - so using those equations I managed to get this result - is this correct so far?

EDIT: I reread your response and initially I thought you were saying that the fact its a cone just means that theres a linear relationship, but upon rereading I feel you mean there is another important detail that stems from this?

EDIT: I reread your response and initially I thought you were saying that the fact its a cone just means that theres a linear relationship, but upon rereading I feel you mean there is another important detail that stems from this?

Note Id usually do a sketch and if necessary lump constant terms together until you simplify near the end.

dx = Z dr

...

The linear relationship between r and x is important (truncated cone) as youre transforming the integral. You can obv do it for other relationships, but you need to be clear about what youre trying to do as you sketch the problem.

(edited 2 months ago)

Thank you so much I had some long complicated answer by the end of it and I had little hope it would be right - but it was!

I do have a question about how you made the original equation for r though ie r = sqrt(A1/pi)*(l-x)/l + sqrt(A2/pi)x/l

My thinking was since it varies linearly with distance along the wire

its form is r=kx+c

then I just tried to equate stuff

so when r = sqrt(a_1/pi), x=0, so c=sqrt(a_1/pi)

and worked out k when r=sqrt(a_2/pi), and x=L

the equation I got was r=(sqrt(a_2/pi)-sqrt(a_1/pi))*x/L +sqrt(A_1/pi)

I do have a question about how you made the original equation for r though ie r = sqrt(A1/pi)*(l-x)/l + sqrt(A2/pi)x/l

My thinking was since it varies linearly with distance along the wire

its form is r=kx+c

then I just tried to equate stuff

so when r = sqrt(a_1/pi), x=0, so c=sqrt(a_1/pi)

and worked out k when r=sqrt(a_2/pi), and x=L

the equation I got was r=(sqrt(a_2/pi)-sqrt(a_1/pi))*x/L +sqrt(A_1/pi)

(edited 2 months ago)

Original post by mosaurlodon

Thank you so much I had some long complicated answer by the end of it and I had little hope it would be right - but it was!

I do have a question about how you made the original equation for r though ie r = sqrt(A1/pi)*(l-x)/l + sqrt(A2/pi)x/l

My thinking was since it varies linearly with distance along the wire

its form is r=kx+c

then I just tried to equate stuff

so when r = sqrt(a_1/pi), x=0, so c=sqrt(a_1/pi)

and worked out k when r=sqrt(a_2/pi), and x=L

the equation I got was r=(sqrt(a_2/pi)-sqrt(a_1/pi))*x/L +sqrt(A_1/pi)

so what was your process and could you please tell me the error(s) in my method?

I do have a question about how you made the original equation for r though ie r = sqrt(A1/pi)*(l-x)/l + sqrt(A2/pi)x/l

My thinking was since it varies linearly with distance along the wire

its form is r=kx+c

then I just tried to equate stuff

so when r = sqrt(a_1/pi), x=0, so c=sqrt(a_1/pi)

and worked out k when r=sqrt(a_2/pi), and x=L

the equation I got was r=(sqrt(a_2/pi)-sqrt(a_1/pi))*x/L +sqrt(A_1/pi)

so what was your process and could you please tell me the error(s) in my method?

r = A(l-x)/l + Bx/l

both terms are linear so the equation is linear and it equals A and B at x=0 and l so it must be what you want. Its one way to "join the two dots".

Theres nothing really wrong with what you did, its just (arguably) more complicated working than it needs to be. You could write it as

r = A + (B-A)x/l

Rearranging will give the previous. Note the previous hint about lumping constant terms together.

Oh yeah I never knew you could do the 'join the 2 dots' method - ive always learn it as a strict 'straight line equation', that actually makes a lot more sense seeing that.

Thanks for all the help!

Thanks for all the help!

Original post by mosaurlodon

Oh yeah I never knew you could do the 'join the 2 dots' method - ive always learn it as a strict 'straight line equation', that actually makes a lot more sense seeing that.

Thanks for all the help!

Thanks for all the help!

- PHYsics as help
- A level physics
- Resistance and Resistivity ENGAA Question
- A level physics Electricity question (3)
- AQA GCSE physics
- Isaav physics question help
- Drift Velocity Q
- Why is the stiffness constant k not a material property - A level physics materials
- GCSE Physics AQA Topic 7 (Electromagnetism) I need help!!!
- Stuck on this maths question
- Difficult Physics question (6 marks)
- URGENT Tenancy Takeover: Classic Studio at Hill View Place, Exeter
- gcse MCQ physics
- How does cleaning work in shared areas?
- A level Physics Uncertainty MCQ help!
- A level physics electricity question (7)
- can someone help mark my answer? GCSE English Language P1
- Dash camera removal - cut wires
- Year 12 alevel Geography NEA help
- Physics question