Above all, in my opinion, UK should start protecting the rights of its own British graduates.
The ability for EU (Continental Europe) students/graduates to work into the UK without ever having any ties to UK, either through family, education, or work experience, is fundamentally flawed in my opinion. EU graduates can first do an IBD internship in their own country, e.g. Paris or Milan, which is *substantially* less competitive than London, and then apply directly to London, depriving positions for British graduates, who were not able to get an internship the prior year due to the dynamics being substantially competitive. UK students cannot simply intern in EU countries, as EU employers prefer native over fluent speakers.
I have spoken to HRs are I-banks, and under the current model, they do not have "quotas" for UK citizen. As long as one does not require a visa (which includes all EU students), they are put into the same category. This has resulted in the following: I know a 12-person team at a I-bank in London, only having 1 British person, with all the remaining people being from the EU. Do you think this is logical?
You may argue that the US operates on similar terms; it, however, does not. If someone wants to work in NYC, but lives in Chicago, they do require familial ties, education or a very valid reason for working in NYC. Many NYC-based I-banks also have special programmes for universities that are based in NYC, thereby directly protecting the students that are based in each region.
Thoughts?