i'd like to point out that there actually is a collaboration in teaching between Oxford, Warwick, Imperial.. but also Bristol and Bath. Bristol and Bath both have very worthwhile maths!
Collaboration does not mean they are all at the same standard. While Bristol and Bath are very good unis for maths, they are not quite of the same standard as COWI.
Collaboration does not mean they are all at the same standard. While Bristol and Bath are very good unis for maths, they are not quite of the same standard as COWI.
meh - the course is rigorous to allow you to prove yourself worthy to go onto any Msc or phd in the world, there's not much more you could want as an undergraduate - most learning comes from the books.
my friend has been accepted onto an oxford msc in maths with his bristol bsc - i think many oxford students would be quite pleased to be doing the oxford msc...
all i'm saying is the differences in the uni's (possibly separating cambridge) are so small that the student experience (what project you get, affinity with professors etc) is going to make more of a difference.
My teacher told me that one of her friends did a PHD in maths and now works for an insurance company as an accurist. Earning 200k+, but has no life, no home, travels everywhere. Cool degree though.
My teacher told me that one of her friends did a PHD in maths and now works for an insurance company as an accurist. Earning 200k+, but has no life, no home, travels everywhere. Cool degree though.
you mean actuary?
you can be an actuary with just a bachelors - preferable in math/physics/economics
meh - the course is rigorous to allow you to prove yourself worthy to go onto any Msc or phd in the world, there's not much more you could want as an undergraduate - most learning comes from the books.
my friend has been accepted onto an oxford msc in maths with his bristol bsc - i think many oxford students would be quite pleased to be doing the oxford msc...
all i'm saying is the differences in the uni's (possibly separating cambridge) are so small that the student experience (what project you get, affinity with professors etc) is going to make more of a difference.
Of course Bristol and Bath (especially the former) are great universities for mathematics, and someone good in math will excel anywhere, and yes, people do go to for example Oxford for their PhDs after those universities. Nevertheless, that does mean that their courses are as good as COWI courses. Like you yourself indicated, it is more impressive if someone goes from Bristol to Oxford than the other way around
Of course Bristol and Bath (especially the former) are great universities for mathematics, and someone good in math will excel anywhere, and yes, people do go to for example Oxford for their PhDs after those universities. Nevertheless, that does mean that their courses are as good as COWI courses. Like you yourself indicated, it is more impressive if someone goes from Bristol to Oxford than the other way around
No it isn't, Oxbridge excel at undergraduate level - but they aren't necessarily the best for post-graduate. A significant amount of maths graduates, at least from Oxford, go onto doing their PhDs at other Universities for a doctoral supervisor whom specialises in whatever the topic of their doctorate is.
Of course Bristol and Bath (especially the former) are great universities for mathematics, and someone good in math will excel anywhere, and yes, people do go to for example Oxford for their PhDs after those universities. Nevertheless, that does mean that their courses are as good as COWI courses. Like you yourself indicated, it is more impressive if someone goes from Bristol to Oxford than the other way around
I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on this.
When one does a postgraduate degree and I'm talking about a PhD, which is not taught, as opposed to an MSc, although the name of the institution is important, what should be the first choice is the supervisor of the chosen research area.
To the layman, doing a PhD at Oxford might be considered great but studying (and possibly later on writing a paper with) a world renowned specialist at Bristol, is considered a greater experience, especially if one chooses to pursue an academic career.
The only time you can really know if you like maths or not is most of the way through your first year studying it as an undergraduate.
I'd say probably not even then! I think it took me until maybe the first few weeks of my third year to fully realise that I don't like Maths and I'm no good at it
Well, actually I like Maths in that I appreciate how elegant it is, and how it helps us to dig right to the very basics of everything we know that might seem obvious to us. But I just don't like doing it
I'd say probably not even then! I think it took me until maybe the first few weeks of my third year to fully realise that I don't like Maths and I'm no good at it
Well, actually I like Maths in that I appreciate how elegant it is, and how it helps us to dig right to the very basics of everything we know that might seem obvious to us. But I just don't like doing it
Now we await someone who says you don't know if you like maths or not until you have a PhD in it.
When do you think you can have a firm grasp of how much you enjoy the kind of mathematics you study as an undergraduate?
When your studying as an undergraduate. Seriously, simply studying undergraduate is not enough. You should be doing as much maths as you can get your hands on, and that means reading around.
There are lots of mega clever people who have been well exposed to maths before uni. There are also a lot of people who come to uni and do maths ALL THE TIME.
When your studying as an undergraduate. Seriously, simply studying undergraduate is not enough. You should be doing as much maths as you can get your hands on, and that means reading.
Fair enough, I thought you were going to say in the other direction (pre-university level mathematics).