The Student Room Group

Differential Equation: Particular Integral

This is the differential equation:
d2sdλ+λmLs=g+λm\frac{d^2s}{d\lambda} + \frac{\lambda}{mL}s = g + \frac{\lambda}{m}

Let the particular integral, s* be:
s=Cλ+Ds^* = C\lambda + D
dsdλ\frac{ds^*}{d\lambda}=C= C
d2sdλ\frac{d^2s^*}{d\lambda}=0= 0

Hence:
λmL(Cλ+D)=g+λm\frac{\lambda}{mL}(C\lambda + D) = g + \frac{\lambda}{m}

So:
Cλ+D=mgLλ+LC\lambda + D = \frac{mgL}{\lambda} + L

Comparing coeffficients:
D=LD = L

But, is:
Cλ=mgLλ?C\lambda = \frac{mgL}{\lambda}?

I know that they are the only variables remaining, but CλC\lambda's λ\lambda is raised to the power of 1, while mgLλ\frac{mgL}{\lambda}'s λ\lambda is raised to the power of -1. So, I don't see how they are equal.

Anyways, the pdf I am using for reference tells that the particular integral is:

s=mgLλ+L s^* = \frac{mgL}{\lambda} + L

Which implies that the relationship of C with mgLλ\frac{mgL}{\lambda} is true.
Reply 1
"Let the particular integral s* be: s*=C\lambda + D"

Wait...are you sure the \lambda s are the same?

EDIT: don't assume I know anything about diffeqs.
Reply 2
Original post by aznkid66
"Let the particular integral s* be: s*=C\lambda + D"

Wait...are you sure the \lambda s are the same?

EDIT: don't assume I know anything about diffeqs.


It's the trial function for the particular integral.
Reply 3
Right, just ignore that.

Yeah, that's weird, it looks a lot like the book is assuming that relationship.

And if s*=mgL/x + L, then:

s*' = -mgL/x^2
s*'' = 2mgL/x^3

Which implies that, after plugging it into the original diffeq:

(2mgL/x^3)+(x/mL)(mgL/x+L)=g+x/m

2mgL/x^3 + g + x/m = g + x/m

Which clearly isn't true when m,g,L,lambda≠0?
Reply 4
Original post by Alpha-Omega
This is the differential equation:
d2sdλ+λmLs=g+λm\frac{d^2s}{d\lambda} + \frac{\lambda}{mL}s = g + \frac{\lambda}{m}

Let the particular integral, s* be:
s=Cλ+Ds^* = C\lambda + D
dsdλ\frac{ds^*}{d\lambda}=C= C
d2sdλ\frac{d^2s^*}{d\lambda}=0= 0

Hence:
λmL(Cλ+D)=g+λm\frac{\lambda}{mL}(C\lambda + D) = g + \frac{\lambda}{m}

So:
Cλ+D=mgLλ+LC\lambda + D = \frac{mgL}{\lambda} + L

Comparing coeffficients:
D=LD = L

But, is:
Cλ=mgLλ?C\lambda = \frac{mgL}{\lambda}?

I know that they are the only variables remaining, but CλC\lambda's λ\lambda is raised to the power of 1, while mgLλ\frac{mgL}{\lambda}'s λ\lambda is raised to the power of -1. So, I don't see how they are equal.

Anyways, the pdf I am using for reference tells that the particular integral is:

s=mgLλ+L s^* = \frac{mgL}{\lambda} + L

Which implies that the relationship of C with mgLλ\frac{mgL}{\lambda} is true.


I'm very rusty on these things, and I didn't spot it at first because of the unfamiliar variables (s instead of y and λ\lambda instead of x), but are you sure your DE is the correct one?

The reason I ask is that I've only ever seen a Particular Integral constructed for second order linear DEs and your DE is non-linear because of the presence of the λs\lambda s term on the LHS.

Quick Reply

Latest