I intend to try and apply to Oxford for Law in the next 2 years. Unfortunately, I don't believe that I have done spectacularly in my GCSEs. I might've done good, but not spectacular. I'm expecting:
Business: 8/9 (Likely 9)
History: 7/8
Geography: 8/9 (Likely 9)
English Lit.: 7
English Lang.: 7
Maths: 8/9
French: 5
Biology: 8/9
Physics: 8/9
Chemistry: 6/7 (Likely 7)
R.S: 9
Since Oxford still sees 8/9s as effectively both A*, I could probably get around 5-6 A*, maybe 7 based off of the best results of my predicted grades. Of course, that's all subject to change; I might get more, I might get less. Who knows.
That's hardly the point though. From what I've heard, 6 A*s is a soft minimum put in place for most people to even expect an interview. Not only that, but there's a relatively high chance I'm going to not only get 1 bad grade (5 for French) but also a 6 in Chemistry, not to mention I'm less confident on my English grades. Given that that would be around 2-3 Bs, is it even worth applying and expecting an interview, even if I do end up getting flawless A-Levels? I remember hearing them talking about how less emphasis is being placed on GCSEs and all, but obviously questions are going to come up if they're interviewing someone who got Bs at GCSEs. Anyone got any solid advice?