The Student Room Group

NF3 lewis structure

Why can’t we draw its structure like this ?image.jpg
Thank you !
(edited 1 year ago)
As a general rule, you want to avoid unpaired electrons unless absolutely necessary. Also, both the N and the doubly bonded F have too many electrons -- for elements in period 2, 8 is a maximum.
Original post by Nancy2000
Why can’t we draw its structure like this ?image.jpg
Thank you !

Mainly because F only forms single bonds. Think of F2 which is is F-F or HF H-F. As a general rule nitrogen forms 3 covalent bonds and carries a lone pair - worth remembering!
Reply 3
You are suggesting a double bond between nitrogen (N) and fluorine (F) by moving one electron from each atom to create the bond. To understand why this is not a typical representation, let's break down the electron configurations and bonding tendencies of each atom for NF3 Lewis Structure:

Nitrogen (N):

Atomic Number: 7

Electron Configuration: 1s2 2s2 2p3

Nitrogen has 5 valence electrons and typically forms 3 covalent bonds, achieving a full outer shell by sharing electrons.

Fluorine (F):

Atomic Number: 9

Electron Configuration: 1s2 2s2 2p5

Fluorine has 7 valence electrons and typically forms 1 covalent bond, achieving a full outer shell by sharing one electron.

When nitrogen and fluorine bond, nitrogen shares 3 of its valence electrons and fluorine shares one. This results in a single bond between nitrogen and fluorine. If you were to "take one electron" from each and form a double bond, it would disrupt the natural tendency of these atoms to achieve full outer electron configurations.

Furthermore, forming a double bond between N and F would lead to:

- An electron-deficient nitrogen that doesn't achieve a full octet.

- An electron-excess fluorine that goes beyond its typical valence.

It's essential to remember that nature tends towards the most stable configurations. The single bond between nitrogen and fluorine is the most stable way these atoms can bond based on their electron configurations.
(edited 7 months ago)

Quick Reply

Latest