... and Churchill College, Cambridge has issued statistics for 9A* average? Also studying statistics, averages can be skewed by anomalies meaning that a few lower GCSE scores which some of the more luckier applicants had does not meant that lots and lots got less than 6A*s. I'm sure there's a wide range of grades that people get to get in, but generally speaking it's best to get the best GCSEs you can, especially as A levels are much harder. As we both are not currently at Cambridge, we both do not know what they are looking for. It would be great if we did.
Yeah, anomalous GCSE performances can skew application statistics, but it works both ways. Plenty of applicants come from the top private schools where everybody gets >12A*s. I don't think a few applicants with extenuating circumstances at GCSE can skew admissions statistics when we're talking about well over 10,000 applicants a year and about 3,500 offer holders. But obviously, yes, the higher grades, the better chance of getting in.
Anyway, this is getting a bit tangential to the topic at hand so I shall bid you good day
Got a B in my final graphics exam, which brought my grade down to an A. I know an A is a great grade, but it was really frustrating because of all the time I'd dedicated to it; it annoyed me that I got an A* in RE without going to any lessons, but only an A in graphics after spending countless nights at school until 6 to finish my coursework.
Music, I got a B. That was simply because my teacher left and then I had a new one every few weeks so never really learnt anything until the last few months when I got an amazing teacher. I was only 2 marks away from an A though and a B is still a great achievement anyway.
I'm going back about 5 years now but my worst GCSE's were D's, French and History. We were all made to do French, and I have no idea, looking back, why I chose History. I still went on to do it at A level too! :/
Either Art or ICT, which is ironic because art was my second favourite subject and ICT was probably my second least favourite. I say either because I got a B in both and I'm not sure which had a higher UMS overall because my ICT was graded in distinction/merit/pass which I don't really understand when it comes to UMS.
I love drawing and being creative but I hated pursuing an art project. It really annoyed me that I had to fill a book with research and test pieces and things like that, and that I wasn't really allowed to draw what I wanted. I guess I loved art as a hobby but not as a subject. I put a lot of work in especially in year 11 but couldn't get an A.
ICT I just didn't like, I'm not great with computers and I didn't put a lot of effort in.
However, if short course PE was a formal qualification and not just a timetable-filler at my school, I probably would have got a U