Who is worse, a bomber pilot or a terrorist?

If there were no terrorists, there would be no need for bomber pilots.

So terrorists are worse.

(Plus bomber pilots have good intentions - to stop the spread of terrorism)

Its's really is that simple.

If you can't see the obvious, then I can't help you. They slaughtered, rape, enslave Muslims and non-Muslims alike. If you choose to believe they won't do it, then its your choice. Maybe you need a closer look, maybe you should stay in the Caliphate for a month or two... and see if their values is really closer to ours...

The fact that you can't tell the difference between a Hezbolla's flag and "mushroom cloud" speaks volume.

Hey, it's a free country, your choice.

Random picture with no context, no explanation, no way of saying where or when it was taken. In short, adding absolutely nothing to the discussion. Well done on an entirely pointless waste of space.

If someone's mother is in a house that gets blown up she gets killed. If a kid is in a car she gets killed. The combat is occurring in villages and towns where fighters are highly mixed with civilians.

There are worse pictures

Its the liberation of Sinjar, its been all over the news - see http://www.mwcnews.net/news/middle-east/55473-sinjar-liberated.html

There are worse pictures



I was illustrating "rubbleization". Of course, none of this was done by bombers....

At present we have an undeclared war that is torturing a whole swathe of the Middle East. Our journalists and assorted idiots caused it by invading Iraq and declaring an "Arab Spring" without knowing what they were talking about or doing.

The "West" should either invade and impose a colonial style government or get out. What they must not do is what they are doing: encouraging foreign combatants to come to Europe to stoke up enough public opinion in favour of bombing for the next bombing raid.

But that doesn't fit with your anachronistic, ignorant far left misunderstanding of modern warfare

Obviously the Arabs themselves should have a say and would probably resist Western governance, but for all the talk of Western action being to blame, there really is a discussion about a lack of Western action being the potential problem. The West did very little in Syria compared with Iraq and Afghanistan and that's probably the worst place right now.

The pilots who fly bombing raids over Syria, rubbelizing the whole country and killing thousands of civilians also believe they are in the right.

...
If they had the opportunity, the air force command would escort all civilians to safety before attacking military targets.
It's really not that difficult.

The terrorists who attacked Paris believed that they were fighting for a good cause and even died for it. They mercilessly killed civilians.

The pilots who fly bombing raids over Syria, rubbelizing the whole country and killing thousands of civilians also believe they are in the right.

No war has been declared by the Western forces and although the ISIS forces have declared war on the West this was not an "official declaration".

Who is worst?

I really don't know why they use soldiers with guns. The bombers can pull up in the street, hold the lollipop stick up to stop the traffic, escort the children to safety, hop up in the air again and shout from the window "watch out bombs coming! Has everyone got to safety?" The bomber then pats its little smart bomb on its nose and says "you be careful down there, don't kill anyone except evil people!". The bomb snuggles up and replies "I am very smart, you know I wont let you down" and then dodges off towards the sunset, determined to do good.

Obviously the Arabs themselves should have a say and would probably resist Western governance, but for all the talk of Western action being to blame, there really is a discussion about a lack of Western action being the potential problem. The West did very little in Syria compared with Iraq and Afghanistan and that's probably the worst place right now.