The Student Room Group

3(2c – 5) – 2(c – 4)

Can someone explain this to me?
Are you missing an equals sign?
Original post by mphysical
Are you missing an equals sign?


No :frown:
Original post by DANIELREED
Can someone explain this to me?



3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

I'm assuming there is no equal, basically all you do is factorise it, so..

3(2c - 5)
3 x 2c = 6c
3 x -5 = -15

So: 6c - 15
**Don't forget to use the -/+ rule**

Now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
Once again, time them.

2 x c = 2c
2 x -4 = -8

2c - 8

Now bring them together...
6c - 15 + 2c - 8

Now deal with them in groups.

6c - 2c = 4c
-15 - 8 = -23.

So answer is... 4c - 23.
(edited 8 years ago)
Thanks alot :d
Original post by ckfeister
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

i'm assuming there is no equal, basically all you do is factorise it, so..

3(2c - 5)
3 x 2c = 6c
3 x -5 = -15

so: 6c - 15
**don't forget to use the -/+ rule**

now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
once again, time them.

2 x c = 2c
2 x -4 = -8

2c - 8

now bring them together...
6c - 15 + 2c - 8

now deal with them in groups.

6c + 2c = 8c
-15 - 8 = -23.

So answer is... 8c - 23.
Original post by DANIELREED
Can someone explain this to me?


Which part are you unsure about, the multiplications or subtractions?
Original post by ckfeister
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

Now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
Once again, time them..
But it is -2(2c - 4)
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by ckfeister
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

I'm assuming there is no equal, basically all you do is factorise it, so..

3(2c - 5)
3 x 2c = 6c
3 x -5 = -15

So: 6c - 15
**Don't forget to use the -/+ rule**

Now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
Once again, time them.

2 x c = 2c
2 x -4 = -8

2c - 8

Now bring them together...
6c - 15 + 2c - 8

Now deal with them in groups.

6c + 2c = 8c
-15 - 8 = -23.

So answer is... 8c - 23.


Lol you just did his homework


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 8
Original post by DANIELREED
Can someone explain this to me?


http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=38
Original post by EnemyofState
Lol you just did his homework


Posted from TSR Mobile


Since when did homework assignments consist of one question?
Original post by mphysical
But it is -2(2c - 4)


.-.
Original post by EnemyofState
Lol you just did his homework


Posted from TSR Mobile


Original post by ScienceFantatic
Since when did homework assignments consist of one question?


^^
Reply 12
Original post by ckfeister
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

I'm assuming there is no equal, basically all you do is factorise it, so..

3(2c - 5)
3 x 2c = 6c
3 x -5 = -15

So: 6c - 15
**Don't forget to use the -/+ rule**

Now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
Once again, time them.

2 x c = 2c
2 x -4 = -8

2c - 8

Now bring them together...
6c - 15 + 2c - 8

Now deal with them in groups.

6c + 2c = 8c
-15 - 8 = -23.

So answer is... 8c - 23.


This is incorrect, the answer is 4c-7
Original post by ckfeister
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

So answer is... 8c - 23.

No.

1. Expand the brackets by multiplying them by the coefficient (3 and -2, not 2).
2. Collect like terms.
.//
Original post by B_9710
This is incorrect, the answer is 4c-7


Exactly what I got.
(Original post by B_9710)
This is incorrect, the answer is 4c-7
Original post by Federerr
Exactly what I got.


So did I. As in my earlier post

(Original post by ckfeister)
3(2c - 5) - 2(c - 4)

Now,
2(c - 4) ** do not use -2 as that isn't to do with equation, if it was --2(2c - 4) that would be different**
mphysical
But it is -2(2c - 4)
But ckfeister seems to have lost the plot since.
Seems to think it is OK to ignore the minus sign.
So not only did he do the guy's homework.
He actually did it wrong
Original post by mphysical
(Original post by B_9710)
This is incorrect, the answer is 4c-7


So did I. As in my earlier post

But ckfeister seems to have lost the plot since.
Seems to think it is OK to ignore the minus sign.
So not only did he do the guy's homework.
He actually did it wrong


:ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee::ahee:

Quick Reply

Latest