Shamima Begums son, a death that brittish government could have prevented

If the reports are true that Shamima Begums son has died. Then that is a death that the brittish government could have prevented. She wanted to return to this country because she was worried about the health of her son. But the Home Secretary revoked her citizenship and stopped her returning. Therefore he is partially responsible for the unfortunate death of her child.

Its her fault her son was sick and she knew that her son is dying and never got him sorted out and heath in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan is never gets sorted out and its bad and the hospitals there is bad

As you’ve quite rightly said the health care in Syria is a dismal. With no money or transportation I am not entirely sure how you expected her to respond to her sons health.

As you’ve quite rightly said the health care in Syria is a dismal. With no money or transportation I am not entirely sure how you expected her to respond to her sons health.

Its her fault her son was sick and she knew that her son is dying and never got him sorted out and heath in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan is never gets sorted out and its bad and the hospitals there is bad

I think as others have already explained:

1. Her circumstances were entirely her fault and not the fault of the British government.

2. Extraction and transport of a nine-months-pregnant woman/woman with newborn from a foreign war zone would have been quite challenging and a danger in itself.

Basically, everything was her fault. Stop being so naive.

And I’m not sure how you expect Javid to get her back

It is against international law to make someone stateless, and now an innocent child has died as a result of a British woman being stripped of her citizenship. This is callous and inhumane.

If the reports are true that Shamima Begums son has died. Then that is a death that the brittish government could have prevented. She wanted to return to this country because she was worried about the health of her son. But the Home Secretary revoked her citizenship and stopped her returning. Therefore he is partially responsible for the unfortunate death of her child.

As you’ve quite rightly said the health care in Syria is a dismal. With no money or transportation I am not entirely sure how you expected her to respond to her sons health.

It is against international law to make someone stateless, and now an innocent child has died as a result of a British woman being stripped of her citizenship. This is callous and inhumane.

Obviously Samima Begum holds abhorrent views and to want to join Islamic State is beyond all comprehension, but she was a child, a product of our society.
I think we had a moral responsibility to her and indeed to her baby. That is why at the time I was just troubled by the decision.

It seemed driven by a sort of populism, not any principle I recognise.

Umm give her citizenship in the first place? What a stupid comment..
It will go to court and she will come back to this country, it is against the law for her to be stateless. She needs help and she will be even more traumatised after the death of her third child.
It’s just a shame a child has died in the process. The government has clearly done this to appease the public.

As you’ve quite rightly said the health care in Syria is a dismal. With no money or transportation I am not entirely sure how you expected her to respond to her sons health.

It is against international law to make someone stateless, and now an innocent child has died as a result of a British woman being stripped of her citizenship. This is callous and inhumane.

Obviously Samima Begum holds abhorrent views and to want to join Islamic State is beyond all comprehension, but she was a child, a product of our society.
I think we had a moral responsibility to her and indeed to her baby. That is why at the time I was just troubled by the decision.

It seemed driven by a sort of populism, not any principle I recognise.

Are you seriously suggesting Javid should have sent people in to Syria?

We’ve already listened enough to your blabber about “poor shamina begum”
And the majority said after your last sympathetic rant for an isis terrorist that her baby would willingly be taken back. Just not her. She could have handed the child over to be brought up in safety here. But instead her child was only a means to an end for her She used that poor little mite for her own agenda
Nobody wants her here. And no one but her has blood on her hands. If she was so worried then when child number 1 died she wouldn’t have had 2 and definitely not 3 But it suited her purpose, thinking it was key to getting her own way. How long do you think it’ll be before she’s pregnant again? Cos she’s certainly conniving enough.
The government is not responsible for this. Just her, only her and hopefully we’ll never see her here again

It's not the responsibility of the British government to look after the child. She joined ISIS, she birthed the child, the responsibility is all hers, she's the one who conceived him knowing she was in an environment unsuitable for raising a child in a civilised manner. Your terrorist sympathy threads are laughable.

let's just remind ourselves of how Ms Beggum's pals treated children:

https://nypost.com/2016/10/26/isis-kills-250-kids-in-dough-kneader-burns-adults-alive/

I intend to personally pursue my MP to investigate how Shamima Begum can be prosecuted under international human rights legislation. She leaves the security of a country that gave her family asylum to join the most violent armed militia in the world. She has 3 children by different men whom she had never met before in the middle of a war zone and all three children die. This is infanticide at its starkest. This animal must be prosecuted . Anybody who has the smallest bit of sympathy for this 'woman' should also be investigated for evidently having terrorist sympathies.

You have to wonder who 'people' would be anyway, Super Child Rescue Team™, An SAS kill team? A Social worker from Sidcup?

(Come to think of it, surely grabbing people from countries we have no treaties with is a bit iffy in the eyes of the sacred International Law?)