Is Bin Laden really dead?

He needs to get a move on if he's to destroy America. Someone needs to tell him he's in his second and last term! Time's a ticking.

Hey, I killed Bashar al-Assad, and dumped his body into the river. I didn't take any pictures or videos; you'll just have to believe me.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Neither of them are theories, they are both speculative hypothesis.

I have just looked it up. http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden. There's even a link to it, it contradicts what you've said, basic "Googling". You're disinformation, incompetence and embarrassing propositions are highly amusing. Really now, I have given you one quick link which took me 10 seconds to find to shoot down what you said, bet you won't offer anything in return. Because you have nothing.

It's a mystery. We can only trust that what the media and American government is saying is true.

As crass as this sounds, the American government should have allowed the press to publish images of Bin Laden's dead body...then well know for sure.

I think the Papparazzi would have a bit of difficulty operating in Pakistan.

Did you want topless photos of Bin Laden then?

There is quite a bit of information about the verification process on the net. This is one example
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/05/dna-tests-not-good-enough-deathers/37286/

The problem with this type of thing is that if the attack was a sham, it would have been known to the organisers from the outset. So they would have been prepared for skepticism. They can pretty much provide anything they want for media consumption, including DNA tests, but there is no way of knowing if they are real or not. Photos are a bit harder as they are open to direct scrutiny, and can be discredited as with the known fakes mentioned. It boils down to we just have to rely on the word of people who have already been regularly discredited as liars.

Are you still wearing your tin foil hat

You seem to be missing my point. I am not saying who is right and wrong. I am simply pointing out that simply because they are called 'conspiracy theories' it does not preclude them from being correct. I am tackling the way 'conspiracy theory' is used to discredit valid information.


You easily found the link, but don't seem to have read what he is wanted for. 9/11 is not mentioned.

I am sorry. I missed the US invasion of Saudi Arabia.

I think they shot him at close range...I don't think they were welcome...ergo "invasion."

That is nothing more than an FBI poster for the public. It was produced before 9/11. It is not a criminal indictment. It also does not exclude 9/11. You also claimed they had not enough proof/evidence it was him, we don't know that from a poster.

I don't really see what you're point is though, it's not evidence of a conspiracy. The perceived absence of "evidence" by you does not imply a conspiracy.

This was your link not mine, though it DOES exclude 9/11. It is not mentioned anywhere on it.



You obviously don't see the point. I am saying that if it was bin Laden and associates (more than one person) as the officially story is, it is a 'conspiracy' by bin Laden and Associates. As it is yet unproven (no indictment) it is a theory (or if you prefer a supposition).
If it wasn't bin Laden and associates (or bin Laden & co with help), as it would still have involved more than one person it is a conspiracy, and as this is also unproven it is also a theory (or if you prefer a supposition).

This whichever it is, this means they are both 'conspiracy theories'.

You need to learn a little bit about US law. The FBI is a Federal investigative agency. It only has Federal jurisidiction. The 9/11 attacks took place in the State of New York and the Commonwealth of Virginia.

I still don't understand what you're saying. Are you saying that because every crime Osama was alleged to have committed is not on that poster, it means the government didn't have enough evidence against him?

Sorry you are unable to understand my point.