The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

I do not hate jews, get real. I hate what the jews in power do with their power. They use falsehoods and make-believe history to advance their racial hatred of the white man. Their religion even tells them that its ok for them to do this. Check out http://www.daatemet.org/daathalacha/en_gentiles.html to get a feel for what their religion teaches.

Jews feel they must control all aspects of life for everyone when they should be concerned with themselves only. This is born out in the facts that they want absolute control over all media. We should all know why this is. Its to keep the truth from being told, and to suppress news they otherwise do not want reported at all, IE crimes committed by non-whites.

If what "jews in power" did was only in, lets say, one contry or one region, it would be different. But when you look into the facts that they(jews) hold almost all medias in every 1st world country, then you have to ask yourself why is this. Only a moron would not see that something is afoot. If you need to go to the lengths the jews do to suppress opposition, then what does that say about the their need to keep the truth from being exposed. The same goes for the banking industry. Why do jews feel they need the upper hand in a countries finances. Is it so they can use blackmail and threats if they do not get their way? I think so, and so does a lot of the rest of the world. They(jews) have done these tactics before and will do it again.

Who do you think was the first people to declare war in WW2? The jews declared war on Germany before hitler ever became the leader. What were the jews thinking by doing this? Imagine for a moment that a particular people in a country, lets say, some black country. Pick one it doesnt matter. Now lets say that whites that live there make up .1 percent of the population but those whites own a majority of the businesses and the ports and they run the banking systems for that country.

What do you think would happen if those whites decided to declare war on their very country they live in? But the war they intend to fight isnt with guns and tanks, but with the livelyhood of every citizen of the country. What do you think would be the result of that being done? Do you think the native population would just sit there and say "gosh darnit them white men are gonna kill us economically and starve us to death" or do you think they would rise up in revolt and do something about it?

You see this is what happened in Germany starting about 1927-1933. The jewish media do not want you to know that. All this info about true history was readily available until the 1950s. Thats when the jews discovered their holocaust industry was so successful. And since the 50s the jews have made every attempt to either: run any non-jew media out of business; buy the non-jewish medias.

You can feel sorry about jews all you like. But they reap what they sow. If you or anyone else cannot see that whats going on is totally against what the white non-jew considers ethical, then you just do not have an open mind to be willing to see the facts. Youth has a tendency to be like that. You do not have to work for the government to see the shady tactics being used, just be aware and pay attention and know what you are looking at when you see a certain situation.

Jews constantly bombard the white man with "multi-racialism" and "diversity" being a good thing. But they only think its a good thing for white countries, not for their "homeleand". The words hipocracy and judaism are interchangeable. They both mean the same thing. The jews cannot have full unquestioned control until they have diluted the white man into being the minority. That is the sole and simple reason for their pushing multiracialism and diversity. Period.

I dont know exactly why the jew wants this. Is it so they can make a dollar more? Is it so they can rule the world? Is it so they can do whatever they please within israel? Who knows what their intentions are. But there is definately an intention there and it involves ridding the world of whites having any power to govern themselves or anyone else. So you draw your own conclusions and i`ll draw mine.

And when i say jew, i dont mean every jew, i mean the jews that do harm to the white man. If whites dont stand up and fend for themselves, no one else is going to do it for them. And if jews feel they have to protect their lies by using threats and blackmail, then what does that tell you about them. It says they feel the need to keep the truth from being told to prevent their marxist ideals from crashing down on them again. History has shown the jews never learn from their mistakes and they still havent and they never will.

Stop being naive to the jews intentions. Ask questions, ask why they do this and do that. Try to get an aswer. You will not get one, you will be called a nazi and an anti-semite and be ignored if you question anything a jew does. Is this acceptable in our society?

Then ask yourself this: Do we need laws to protect a truth or do we need laws to protect a lie? Truth doesnt need laws to protect it. Only lies do. What better way to prevent the truth from being learned than to stifle all attempts to find it. This was a coup for the jew! Now he can do whaever he likes and if you question it you go to jail. Welcome to the new Soviet Bloc my friends.
Reply 201
Wow man you are scaring me and I am a white anglo-saxon protestant. How can believe this crap if you do in fact follow your own suggestions and look for the facts and ask questions. You cite such junk as blackandjews.com and other racist websites, how can you consider these reliable sources, if you are going to research go for first hand accounts and not history written in the view of some angry skinheads who think hitler was good and who probably wanna grow up and follow in his misguided footsteps. If you ever wanna learn the truth go read a history book and suprise suprise go to business publications and realize that very few media outlets are owned by the kewish people... So some have jewish ceo's but the stockholders can easily change this banks are not ownd by jewish people except for maybe a select few and even then the shareholders are not all jewish
Reply 202
AntiLiberal
calling someone an anti-semite = acknowleding they can think for themselves and be aware of thier surroundings, so thank you.


how about troll? Or is that a compliment as well?
Reply 203
AntiLiberal
I do not hate jews, get real. I hate what the jews in power do with their power. They use falsehoods and make-believe history to advance their racial hatred of the white man. Their religion even tells them that its ok for them to do this. Check out http://www.daatemet.org/daathalacha/en_gentiles.html to get a feel for what their religion teaches.

Jews feel they must control all aspects of life for everyone when they should be concerned with themselves only. This is born out in the facts that they want absolute control over all media. We should all know why this is. Its to keep the truth from being told, and to suppress news they otherwise do not want reported at all, IE crimes committed by non-whites.

If what "jews in power" did was only in, lets say, one contry or one region, it would be different. But when you look into the facts that they(jews) hold almost all medias in every 1st world country, then you have to ask yourself why is this. Only a moron would not see that something is afoot. If you need to go to the lengths the jews do to suppress opposition, then what does that say about the their need to keep the truth from being exposed. The same goes for the banking industry. Why do jews feel they need the upper hand in a countries finances. Is it so they can use blackmail and threats if they do not get their way? I think so, and so does a lot of the rest of the world. They(jews) have done these tactics before and will do it again.

Who do you think was the first people to declare war in WW2? The jews declared war on Germany before hitler ever became the leader. What were the jews thinking by doing this? Imagine for a moment that a particular people in a country, lets say, some black country. Pick one it doesnt matter. Now lets say that whites that live there make up .1 percent of the population but those whites own a majority of the businesses and the ports and they run the banking systems for that country.

What do you think would happen if those whites decided to declare war on their very country they live in? But the war they intend to fight isnt with guns and tanks, but with the livelyhood of every citizen of the country. What do you think would be the result of that being done? Do you think the native population would just sit there and say "gosh darnit them white men are gonna kill us economically and starve us to death" or do you think they would rise up in revolt and do something about it?

You see this is what happened in Germany starting about 1927-1933. The jewish media do not want you to know that. All this info about true history was readily available until the 1950s. Thats when the jews discovered their holocaust industry was so successful. And since the 50s the jews have made every attempt to either: run any non-jew media out of business; buy the non-jewish medias.

You can feel sorry about jews all you like. But they reap what they sow. If you or anyone else cannot see that whats going on is totally against what the white non-jew considers ethical, then you just do not have an open mind to be willing to see the facts. Youth has a tendency to be like that. You do not have to work for the government to see the shady tactics being used, just be aware and pay attention and know what you are looking at when you see a certain situation.

Jews constantly bombard the white man with "multi-racialism" and "diversity" being a good thing. But they only think its a good thing for white countries, not for their "homeleand". The words hipocracy and judaism are interchangeable. They both mean the same thing. The jews cannot have full unquestioned control until they have diluted the white man into being the minority. That is the sole and simple reason for their pushing multiracialism and diversity. Period.

I dont know exactly why the jew wants this. Is it so they can make a dollar more? Is it so they can rule the world? Is it so they can do whatever they please within israel? Who knows what their intentions are. But there is definately an intention there and it involves ridding the world of whites having any power to govern themselves or anyone else. So you draw your own conclusions and i`ll draw mine.

And when i say jew, i dont mean every jew, i mean the jews that do harm to the white man. If whites dont stand up and fend for themselves, no one else is going to do it for them. And if jews feel they have to protect their lies by using threats and blackmail, then what does that tell you about them. It says they feel the need to keep the truth from being told to prevent their marxist ideals from crashing down on them again. History has shown the jews never learn from their mistakes and they still havent and they never will.

Stop being naive to the jews intentions. Ask questions, ask why they do this and do that. Try to get an aswer. You will not get one, you will be called a nazi and an anti-semite and be ignored if you question anything a jew does. Is this acceptable in our society?

Then ask yourself this: Do we need laws to protect a truth or do we need laws to protect a lie? Truth doesnt need laws to protect it. Only lies do. What better way to prevent the truth from being learned than to stifle all attempts to find it. This was a coup for the jew! Now he can do whaever he likes and if you question it you go to jail. Welcome to the new Soviet Bloc my friends.


Jews started ww2? I know jews and germans sound somewhat alike, but try to get it right :rolleyes:
PadFoot90
Jews started ww2? I know jews and germans sound somewhat alike, but try to get it right :rolleyes:

:biggrin:
Reply 205
AntiLiberal
Who do you think was the first people to declare war in WW2? The jews declared war on Germany before hitler ever became the leader.


leader of what?

i also really take issue with the idea that this was a declaration of war. i understand the term can apply in many contexts, war on obesity, war on pollution etc. And clearly this is how the term is being used in the daily express article:

"In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw Jewish merchants are waiting for a commercial crusade."

One can hardly compare these actions with those of 1939.

Can the invasion of Poland be likened to this: "Large numbers of merchants in London have resolved to stop buying German goods, even at the cost of suffering heavy loss."

"A concerted boycott by Jewish buyers is likely to involve grave damage to the German export trade. Jewish merchants all over the world are large buyers of German manufactured goods, chiefly cotton goods, silks, toys, electrical fittings, and furniture."
Taking the above quote, are examples of drives for economic autarky and urgings to buy (insert country name e.g. british) all to be considered declarations of war in which other countries are justified in sending in the tanks?

gosh, some people have resolved to stop buying nestle products, someone should tell them that this could in fact be the first shots being fired in another world war and that they should not be surprised if they find themselves in concentration camps or gas chambers.

To suggest the first shots of world war two were jewish is absurd to say the least. As another website clarifies economic boycotts in retaliation for mistreatment of various groups and human rights violations are still widely practiced today both by groups and governments.

its also funny how you take the articel headline at face value but ignore important elements within it such as the statement that "sectional differences and antagonisms have been submerged in one common aim - to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerite anti-Semitism and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority. World Jewry has made up its mind not to rest quiescent in face of this revival of medieval Jew-baiting."

This i think answers your question "what were the jews thinking by doing this?" If you want some more info on the early persecution of the jews by the NSDAP i am more than happy to provide some of the many examples.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/27/eveningnews/main639143.shtml

See with "friends" like these who needs enemies. The world will sooner or later realize what is going on and there will be a reckoning.

Take special note of this paragraph:
"At the heart of the investigation are two people who work at The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington."

Those are the jews that are ruining America and its government.
Reply 207
AntiLiberal

The jews declared war on Germany before hitler ever became the leader. .


A bit strange, since you claim that, in fact, they were running that country (like all the rest). Did they declare war on themselves?
giordano
A bit strange, since you claim that, in fact, they were running that country (like all the rest). Did they declare war on themselves?



Idiot.
Reply 209
giordano
A bit strange, since you claim that, in fact, they were running that country (like all the rest). Did they declare war on themselves?


LOL nice one :biggrin:

Anti liberal, you can provide all your "evidence" and it isnt going to change anyone's mind, stop blaming the world's problems on scapgoats. Did it ever cross your mind people might bother to read your posts and take them more seriously if you werent so blatently anti-semetic?It's a miracle you havent been banned yet.
Reply 210
AntiLiberal
Idiot.


Anti-liberal, your message contains your signature only. Some technical problem?
PadFoot90
LOL nice one :biggrin:

Anti liberal, you can provide all your "evidence" and it isnt going to change anyone's mind, stop blaming the world's problems on scapgoats. Did it ever cross your mind people might bother to read your posts and take them more seriously if you werent so blatently anti-semetic?It's a miracle you havent been banned yet.



Yeah it is a miracle considering liberals would rather not face opposing views rather than confront them. I dont view jews and zionist jews as a race as much as i consider them a political party. My views arent against jews as a whole but are against the political affilliations/actions that they represent. Anyone who does not know what they do or what they represent is either 1) ignorant to the facts 2) brainwashed and just refuses to see whats going on 3) part of the problem.

Padfoot, i have never seen you do anything other than make stupid snide remarks. Why dont you tell me ONE THING that you have an opinion on instead of lowering yourself to jew tactics of smear and bash.
A book that every liberal here should read is The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald. Read it if you want to better yourself through education and you will understand the nature of the jewish problems in the world today.
Reply 213
AntiLiberal
Yeah it is a miracle considering liberals would rather not face opposing views rather than confront them. I dont view jews and zionist jews as a race as much as i consider them a political party. My views arent against jews as a whole but are against the political affilliations/actions that they represent. Anyone who does not know what they do or what they represent is either 1) ignorant to the facts 2) brainwashed and just refuses to see whats going on 3) part of the problem.

Padfoot, i have never seen you do anything other than make stupid snide remarks. Why dont you tell me ONE THING that you have an opinion on instead of lowering yourself to jew tactics of smear and bash.


Okay guys, I can't think for myself so am I:
1) ignorant to the facts
2) brainwashed and just refuse to see whats going on
3) part of the problem.

I'm thinking 2. Anyone else have an opinion?
Reply 214
AntiLiberal, I have never seen you do anything other than make stupid snide remarks. Why don't you tell me ONE THING that you have an opinion on instead of lowering yourself to antisemitic tactics of smear and bash?
Reply 215
spk
AntiLiberal, I have never seen you do anything other than make stupid snide remarks. Why don't you tell me ONE THING that you have an opinion on instead of lowering yourself to antisemitic tactics of smear and bash?


His only opinion is that jews rule the world.
Reply 216
AntiLiberal
Yeah it is a miracle considering liberals would rather not face opposing views rather than confront them. I dont view jews and zionist jews as a race as much as i consider them a political party. My views arent against jews as a whole but are against the political affilliations/actions that they represent. Anyone who does not know what they do or what they represent is either 1) ignorant to the facts 2) brainwashed and just refuses to see whats going on 3) part of the problem.

Padfoot, i have never seen you do anything other than make stupid snide remarks. Why dont you tell me ONE THING that you have an opinion on instead of lowering yourself to jew tactics of smear and bash.


Obviously you havent looked very hard then. Tell me, do you have anything to say that doesnt involvde jews? For example: Presidential election thread: "Kerry is a Jew, enough said". 1: No he isn't. 2: Why does it matter? Turn on a TV, read a newspaper, come up with something different to say.
Reply 217
PadFoot90
Obviously you havent looked very hard then. Tell me, do you have anything to say that doesnt involvde jews? For example: Presidential election thread: "Kerry is a Jew, enough said". 1: No he isn't. 2: Why does it matter? Turn on a TV, read a newspaper, come up with something different to say.


Advice for antiliberal: stop picking on Jews! why don't you find some new, original scapegoats, such as gypsies, homosexuals, freemasons... sorry, that's not so original either
Reply 218
giordano
Advice for antiliberal: stop picking on Jews! why don't you find some new, original scapegoats, such as gypsies, homosexuals, freemasons... sorry, that's not so original either


Why not just pick a majority to pick on. Like english people in england or something.
That's my new theory. English people rule England.
Reply 219
Mr Moncal
Why not just pick a majority to pick on. Like english people in england or something.
That's my new theory. English people rule England.


You're right; e.g. I am sure there must be a Kyrgiz conspiration in order to rule Kyrgizstan

Latest

Trending

Trending