1.When running the burden in equity, what type of covenants can run? Why?
2. When running the benefit of the covenants in law and equity, what type of covenants can run?
3. For either the benefit or the burden of a covenant to run with the land, the covenant must ‘touch and concern’ the land. What does this mean in relation to the covenant?
4. Why does a claimant need to show that a covenant ‘runs with the land’ and what is meant by this phrase?
5. What legal rule(s) is/are used to show that the new owner of the land was always intended to benefit from the covenant?