AQA A-level Law Paper 3 (7162/3) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]

AQA A-level Law Paper 3 (7162/3) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]

Welcome to the exam discussion thread for this exam. Introduce yourself! Let others know what you're aiming for in your exams, what you are struggling with in your revision or anything else.

Wishing you all the best of luck.

General Information
Date/Time: 12 Jun 2023/ AM
Length: 2hr

(edited 10 months ago)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Maysaund

Any predictions for the 12th June? As justice and fault have already come up, is question 9 likely to be morality?

Reply 2

Starrytillymae

Original post by Maysaund

Any predictions for the 12th June? As justice and fault have already come up, is question 9 likely to be morality?

i doubt it'll be fault or justice because we've done them before- but according to past papers, it's always society and balancing conflicting interests by the looks of it. that's what my teacher thinks it'll be anyway but i'm defo not gonna rule morality out just in case!!

Reply 3

kiries

Original post by Starrytillymae

but balancing has come up in recent years for paper 3 so wouldn't it make more sense for it to be morality this time around?

Reply 4

Starrytillymae

Original post by kiries

but balancing has come up in recent years for paper 3 so wouldn't it make more sense for it to be morality this time around?

honestly i definitely feel like it could be morality. like my gut says morality. but my teacher does think that because balancing interests comes up every year, it's gonna be that? it's 50/50 i think

Reply 5

kiries

Original post by Starrytillymae

honestly i definitely feel like it could be morality. like my gut says morality. but my teacher does think that because balancing interests comes up every year, it's gonna be that? it's 50/50 i think

ooh okay, thanks

Reply 6

si1121

Did any one have any predictions of the 30 marker of 3A?

Reply 7

Ned67

Not sure, potentially consumer rights for one of them.. just a total guess though. Anybody else doing 3A?

Reply 8

Becky_luna

bit stressed about revising for this one
good luck everyone
i do hope it is morality

Reply 9

kiries

does anyone have predictions for 3B/human rights??

Reply 10

Maysaund

I do, honestly struggling so much with the revision. Feel like my brain is melting trying to comprehend vitiating factors.

Original post by Ned67

Not sure, potentially consumer rights for one of them.. just a total guess though. Anybody else doing 3A?

Reply 11

Starrytillymae

Original post by Maysaund

I do, honestly struggling so much with the revision. Feel like my brain is melting trying to comprehend vitiating factors.

truly! my brain is so full of previous exam content that i feel like nothing is going in. why does there have to be THREE types of misrepresentation???

Reply 12

Xcraft

anyone got any predictions for paper 3 law on Monday for contract

Reply 13

Becky_luna

Original post by Xcraft

anyone got any predictions for paper 3 law on Monday for contract

same i need it as well

Reply 14

Ned67

Anybody got any predictions for 3A (contract)?

Reply 15

Becky_luna

Original post by Maysaund

I do, honestly struggling so much with the revision. Feel like my brain is melting trying to comprehend vitiating factors.

that was me and terms and exclusion clauses so much information

Reply 16

Strawberrysh

What parts of the English legal system came up last year in paper 3 contract?

Reply 17

Pwca

TSR Community Staff

Hey everyone :smile:

How did the exam go?

A-level Law

Reply 18

username6186032

Contract - thought it went well
Q7 - I put you don’t have to sue immediately so she could get her £500
Q8 - I put that there wasn’t even a contract because her acceptance was not unconditional and if there was there’s be a lapse of time
Q9 - happy it was morality
Q10 - negligent and innocent misrep and frustration but frustration wouldn’t work because it was foreseeable and the garden wasn’t damaged so no commercial sterility. I put if there was then law reform frustrated contracts act they’d get the sums paid back and money payable would cease to be payable
Q11 - intent to create legal relations (wasn’t sure what else please let me know if u put something like promissory estoppel) and then CRA goods and privity of contract but as he was named and contract purports to confer a benefit he’d have rights. For the balancing conflicting interests i was just like exclusion clauses aren’t effective and consumers are protected