I know this is way past when the OP will care (I don't look at f46 that often), but given other discussions, thought it would be worth adding my thoughts on how I'd answer these in an exam:
12) I'd immediately note two 'sub terms' in each term cancel, so
xn=(−1)n. (not a big deal).
15) I'll admit to wasting a little time actually looking at differences etc., but it's pointless here. Once you actually look at D and E, it's obvious both can't be true, and then E is obviously "small", while the LHS is > 1/2. So E is false.
16) Just looking, taking a 2 from each term in the top means a lot cancels, the answer's going to be of the form 2^n p/q for some choice of integers p, q.
When n = 2, the answer is 2. That rules out 3|q and means only one possible answer.
The general point here is that of the 3 questions, in two of them I'm not really solving the problem, I'm somewhat "gaming the system" to rule out options until I can determine which of A-E to answer. 16 is a fairly common example where I can use mathematical intuition to say "the answer's going to look roughly like XYZ" and then use the given answers and particular cases to work out the correct one.
The "general general" point: I find I'm naturally quite good at playing these games on the MAT questions. But I felt it ended up counterproductive for the SMC. How much that's my particular mathematical strengths / weaknesses (geometry!) and how much it's a genuine difference in "question setting" I don't know (and I do feel the MAT is a bit
too "gameable"). But I definitely found they didn't "play the same" for me.