Hello

I am looking for some help with the following question:

A sphere of radius r, is moving through a fluid of density ρ, at velocity v. The velocity is sufficiently high such that the effect of the fluids viscosity may be ignored. It is postulated that the resistive force acting on the sphere: F ∝ r v ρ

Use dimensional analysis to confirm the relationship and develop a final formula for the resistive force, F.

I have used force, density, velocity and length and equated the indices with the outcome of: F=K ρr^2v^2

I am unsure if this answers the question of confirming the relationship and whether this is how the final formula for F should look.

Any help is appreciated.

I am looking for some help with the following question:

A sphere of radius r, is moving through a fluid of density ρ, at velocity v. The velocity is sufficiently high such that the effect of the fluids viscosity may be ignored. It is postulated that the resistive force acting on the sphere: F ∝ r v ρ

Use dimensional analysis to confirm the relationship and develop a final formula for the resistive force, F.

I have used force, density, velocity and length and equated the indices with the outcome of: F=K ρr^2v^2

I am unsure if this answers the question of confirming the relationship and whether this is how the final formula for F should look.

Any help is appreciated.

Original post by thomas0611

Hello

I am looking for some help with the following question:

A sphere of radius r, is moving through a fluid of density ρ, at velocity v. The velocity is sufficiently high such that the effect of the fluids viscosity may be ignored. It is postulated that the resistive force acting on the sphere: F ∝ r v ρ

Use dimensional analysis to confirm the relationship and develop a final formula for the resistive force, F.

I have used force, density, velocity and length and equated the indices with the outcome of: F=K ρr^2v^2

I am unsure if this answers the question of confirming the relationship and whether this is how the final formula for F should look.

Any help is appreciated.

I am looking for some help with the following question:

A sphere of radius r, is moving through a fluid of density ρ, at velocity v. The velocity is sufficiently high such that the effect of the fluids viscosity may be ignored. It is postulated that the resistive force acting on the sphere: F ∝ r v ρ

Use dimensional analysis to confirm the relationship and develop a final formula for the resistive force, F.

I have used force, density, velocity and length and equated the indices with the outcome of: F=K ρr^2v^2

I am unsure if this answers the question of confirming the relationship and whether this is how the final formula for F should look.

Any help is appreciated.

Its a bit of a non trivial question (not hard, but not easy). You should be able to confirm the formula, so if youve got something different it would help to see what you did.

Original post by mqb2766

Its a bit of a non trivial question (not hard, but not easy). You should be able to confirm the formula, so if youve got something different it would help to see what you did.

I assume by confirming the relationship it means both sides are the same:

F ∝ r v ρ

MLT^-2 ∝ L x LT^-1 x ML^-3

MLT^-2 ∝ MLT^-1

Have I done something wrong here?

Original post by thomas0611

I assume by confirming the relationship it means both sides are the same:

F ∝ r v ρ

MLT^-2 ∝ L x LT^-1 x ML^-3

MLT^-2 ∝ MLT^-1

Have I done something wrong here?

F ∝ r v ρ

MLT^-2 ∝ L x LT^-1 x ML^-3

MLT^-2 ∝ MLT^-1

Have I done something wrong here?

To add to my previous reply, would this be the correct solution to confirm the relationship:

F=K ρr^2v^2

MLT^-2 = ML^-3 L^2 LT^-2

MLT^-2 = M L^-3 + L^2 + L^1 T^-2

MLT^-2 = MLT^-2

Thanks for the help

Original post by thomas0611

I assume by confirming the relationship it means both sides are the same:

F ∝ r v ρ

MLT^-2 ∝ L x LT^-1 x ML^-3

MLT^-2 ∝ MLT^-1

Have I done something wrong here?

F ∝ r v ρ

MLT^-2 ∝ L x LT^-1 x ML^-3

MLT^-2 ∝ MLT^-1

Have I done something wrong here?

I just skim read and thought it was viscosity on the right rather than density which is the problem with the given equation. As you say

F = MLT^-2

Right hand side = L x LT^-1 x ML^-3 = ML^-1T^-1

(note the final expression is slightly different from yours - typo). So you want an L^2T^-1 which is the viscosity / density "problem"

Original post by mqb2766

I just skim read and thought it was viscosity on the right rather than density which is the problem with the given equation. As you say

F = MLT^-2

Right hand side = L x LT^-1 x ML^-3 = ML^-1T^-1

(note the final expression is slightly different from yours - typo). So you want an L^2T^-1 which is the viscosity / density "problem"

F = MLT^-2

Right hand side = L x LT^-1 x ML^-3 = ML^-1T^-1

(note the final expression is slightly different from yours - typo). So you want an L^2T^-1 which is the viscosity / density "problem"

So should I be using viscosity not density to confirm the relationship?

Original post by thomas0611

So should I be using viscosity not density to confirm the relationship?

It's a bit unclear what's going on TBH (and some suspicion there's a mistake in the question).

There's a known formula for motion of a sphere through a viscous liquid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes%27_law):

$F \propto \mu r v$

which looks very like what you've been asked to confirm, only here $\mu$ is viscosity with units $ML^{-1}T^{-1}$

There's also a known formula for rapid motion of a sphere through a non-viscous liquid of density $\rho$:

$F \propto \rho r^2 v^2$

What you've done is (correctly) deduced that if F depends on $\rho, r, v$, then by dimensional analysis, $F \propto \rho r^2 v^2$.

But, that isn't the relationship you were asked to confirm.

So we're left with the following possibilities:

1.

The question meant to use viscosity, at some point the incorrect word density was substituted but the formula remained that for viscosity.

2.

The question meant to use density, but incorrectly used the formula involving viscosity.

3.

The question meant to use density, and the intent was to give you an incomplete formula (where you needed to find the indices).

4.

Something else.

For case 1, you should be using viscosity.

For case 4, who knows...?

[And because of the ambiguity, it's hard for anyone to really know what to say at this point].

- Dimensional Analysis
- Dimensional Analysis engineering help
- Dimensional analysis maths question help please!
- Dimensional Analysis - Speed of sound in a gas
- Dimensional Analysis
- Calculating free electrons per meter length of wire?
- Chemistry question help!!
- Rate question
- my last duchess poem gcse
- determining units of measurements
- Dimensional Analysis
- Dimensional Analysis
- gimme tips for physics
- AQA A Level Further Mathematics 7367/3M - 15 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat]
- SUVAT Equations in 2D
- Maths dimensional analysis
- Organic inspires man made
- what is it like to study foundation course at central saint maritns?
- If the earth is round, why dont we fall off it?
- HNC Math trig question

- Target Oxbridge 2024-2025
- Physics
- Shamima Begum was made a scapegoat – we would welcome her back, say Bethnal Green res
- Is maths and philosophy just as employable as a maths degree?
- Inns of court scholarship (Bar course)
- I have made literally no friends at uni and I feel so hopeless
- MMU accommodation recommendations- Archway
- easiest unis to get into for medicine
- Uni choice
- Oxbridge mathematics supercurriculars, 2025 entry
- Official Dental Hygiene and Therapy (Oral Health Science) 2024 Entry Thread
- So I got caught with my phone in my A2 exam...
- September 2024
- Middle eastern girls
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 46)
- TSR official 2024 formula one thread
- Bristol maths or Edinburgh maths?
- LSE International Social and Public Policy 2024-2024 (ISPP)
- Personal Statements
- NICS Staff Officer and Deputy Principal recruitment 2022 2023

- MEng Uni
- Official University of Salford Applicants Thread 2024
- Help with Uni choice
- Official Oxford 2024 Postgraduate Applicants Thread
- Is it worth getting into law at 28?
- 2024 entry A100 / A101 Medicine fastest and slowest offer senders
- Shaw's year 12 gyg: trying to keep myself on track!!
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- Accenture 2023-2024 grad scheme
- DWP Work Coach Interview - how long to hear
- 15 year olds and BTECS
- Official University of Bristol Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entry
- Official: University of Manchester A106 2024 Entry Applicants
- Tatakae L's GYG Journey
- Official: Barts and the London (QMUL) A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- What is the meaning of life?
- Williams Racing Work Experience 2023 (Formula 1, Engineering)
- Preferred College
- The Arsenal Thread XXVI
- anyone have any idea on what questions they ask at OU nursing interview?

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023

- Mock set 4 paper 2 q14 a level maths (4 distinct points)
- UKMT Intermediate Math Challenge 2024 - Discussion
- Help with complex summation further maths a levels
- GCSE Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Could I have some help with this suvat question?
- MAT practice
- A-level Mathematics Study Group 2023-2024
- Alevel Maths Question
- weird cosine question
- Series function not differentiable at a point

- hyperbolic function catenary problem
- can anyone answer this A level vectors question (very challenging)
- STEP foundation module help pls
- Ukmt IMC 2024
- ukmt imc
- This maths question is driving me crazy
- Maths Mechanics
- Confused on surds question
- HNC MATHS A2 Task 3 (Radio Transmitters)
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023