The Student Room Group

Is there a difference?

Is there a difference between the following?

2-bromo-4-methylhexane & 4-methyl-2-bromohexane

In representing 1-propanol, is there a difference between: CH2(OH)CH2CH3 & CH3CH2CH2OH

Thanks.
Yea, one of them is named wrong. If it's a haloalkane you use the halogen's prefix e.g fluoro-/chloro-/bromo-/iodo-.
Reply 2
halogen is given the smallest number
something to do with electronegative in this case not always
Original post by SWEngineer

In representing 1-propanol, is there a difference between: CH2(OH)CH2CH3 & CH3CH2CH2OH

Thanks.


Both are the same compound. Just reflect it (right-left) and you'll see they are not isomers. If you are asking which was the correct way of writing it, both are correct. Although it is usual to put the functional group on the right
Reply 4
Original post by Plato's Trousers
Both are the same compound. Just reflect it (right-left) and you'll see they are not isomers. If you are asking which was the correct way of writing it, both are correct. Although it is usual to put the functional group on the right


So, is representing an organic compund by either 2-bromo-4-methylhexane or 4-methyl-2-bromohexane considered the same? And, doesn't matter if bromo or methyl come first?
Original post by SWEngineer
So, is representing an organic compund by either 2-bromo-4-methylhexane or 4-methyl-2-bromohexane considered the same? And, doesn't matter if bromo or methyl come first?


The order does matter, yes.

According to the IUPAC rules, the substituents are named in alphabetic order. So that one would be 2-bromo-4-methylhexane.

Of course, it would still be understood if you put them the other way round, it's just not good chemical manners.

Quick Reply

Latest