The Student Room Group

The Proof is Trivial!

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Jkn
Problem 269***

Using the previous problem as a hint,

Find functions f and g such that ζ(s)=f(s)+0g(s,t) dt\displaystyle \zeta(s)=f(s)+\int_0^{\infty} g(s,t) \ dt


Dare I give:
g(s,t)=0g(s,t) = 0, f(s)=ζ(s)f(s) = \zeta(s)?
Apologies if I've misunderstood ζ\zeta - I flee from contour integration at every possible opportunity (not that there have been many such opportunities - I really mean that any time it might have been useful to learn contour integration, I ran away from it like the wind).
Reply 1921
Original post by Smaug123
Is this possible without contour integration? Contour integration is horrible :frown:

Hmm, I'd imagine it would be doable with Taylor's series? Not too sure. :tongue:
Original post by Smaug123
Dare I give:
g(s,t)=0g(s,t) = 0, f(s)=ζ(s)f(s) = \zeta(s)?
Apologies if I've misunderstood ζ\zeta - I flee from contour integration at every possible opportunity (not that there have been many such opportunities - I really mean that any time it might have been useful to learn contour integration, I ran away from it like the wind).

I've modified the question now - the point of the question being to express the mysterious Zeta function in terms of less-mysterious 'elementary' functions which can, in turn, be used to approximate ζ(2n+1)\zeta(2n+1) (nNn \in \mathbb{N}) by using integral approximations :smile:

I learnt it this morning but I'm still feeling a bit shaky (hoping people will engage in discussion on ASOM with me with regards to a few problems!) I'm probably not quite at the point where I could have done the problem LOTF just solved, though I did think it worth posting as I knew a solution would not take long to emerge.
Problem 270

what is: 1x4(1+x2)1/2dx\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{x^{4}(1+x^{2})^{1/2}}dx ?
Original post by Hasufel
Problem 270

what is: 1x4(1+x2)1/2dx\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{x^{4}(1+x^{2})^{1/2}}dx ?

Solution 270

dxx4(1+x2)12=x=tantcot3tcsct dt\displaystyle \int \frac{dx}{x^{4} (1+x^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}} \overset{x = \tan t}= \int \cot^{3} t \csc t \ dt

Now, note that cot2t+1csc2t\cot^{2} t + 1 \equiv \csc^{2} t

cot3tcsct dt=cottcsct(csc2t1) dt=u=csct1u2 du=u13u3+C=csct13csc3t+C=x2+1x13(x2+1)32x3+C=x2+1(2x21)3x2+C\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \int \cot^{3} t \csc t \ dt = \int \cot t \csc t ( \csc^2 t - 1) \ dt &\overset{u = \csc t}= \int 1 - u^{2} \ du \\ & = u - \frac{1}{3} u^{3} + \mathcal{C} \\ & = \csc t - \frac{1}{3} \csc^{3} t + \mathcal{C} \\ & = \frac{\sqrt{x^{2} + 1}}{x} - \frac{1}{3} \frac{(x^2 + 1)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{x^3} + \mathcal{C} \\ & = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + 1} (2x^2 - 1)}{3x^2} + \mathcal{C} \end{aligned}
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 1924
Original post by Felix Felicis
x

Basically the same as yours but more direct:

Solution 270 (2)

Let x=1u21x=\frac{1}{\sqrt{u^2-1}},

1x41+x2 dx=(u21)2u21uu(u21)32 du=1u2 du[br]=u13u3+C=x2+1(2x21)3x2+C\displaystyle \Rightarrow \int \frac{1}{x^4 \sqrt{1+x^2}} \ dx = \int (u^2-1)^2 \frac{\sqrt{u^2-1}}{u} \frac{-u}{(u^2-1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \ du = \int 1- u^2 \ du [br]\displaystyle = u - \frac{1}{3} u^3 + C=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+1} (2x^2-1)}{3x^2} + C

Spoiler

We can generalise by using the same substitution,

1x2(n+1)1+x2 dx=(u21)n du=r=0n(nr)(1)nru2r du[br]=r=0n(nr)(1)nru2r+12r+1+C=r=0n(nr)(1)nr(1+x2)2r+12x2r+1(2r+1)+C\displaystyle \Rightarrow \int \frac{1}{x^{2(n+1)} \sqrt{1+x^2}} \ dx = - \int (u^2-1)^n \ du = - \sum_{r=0}^n \binom{n}{r} (-1)^{n-r} \int u^{2r} \ du [br]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} = - \sum_{r=0}^n \binom{n}{r} (-1)^{n-r} \frac{u^{2r+1}}{2r+1} + C = - \sum_{r=0}^n \binom{n}{r} (-1)^{n-r} \frac{(1+x^2)^{ \frac{2r+1}{2} }}{x^{2r+1}(2r+1)} + C \end{aligned}
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 1925
γ:=limn(k=1n1klog(n))\displaystyle \gamma := \lim_{n \to \infty} \left( \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}-\log(n) \right) which is known as the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Problem 271
***

Prove that 0exlog(x) dx=Γ(1)=ψ(1)=γ\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x} \log(x) \ dx = \Gamma'(1) =\psi(1) = -\gamma.

Note that I require you to prove any non-* theorems/results that you use in your proof.

Problem 272*

Prove that γ=40ex2xlog(x) dx=01loglog(1x) dx=0(1ex11xex) dx[br]=01(1log(x)+11x) dx=01x(11+xkex) dx\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \gamma = -4 \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2} x \log(x) \ dx = -\int_0^1 \log \log \left(\frac{1}{x} \right) \ dx = \int_0^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{e^x-1}-\frac{1}{xe^x} \right) \ dx \end{aligned}[br]\displaystyle = \int_0^1 \left( \frac{1}{\log(x)}+\frac{1}{1-x} \right) \ dx = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{x} \left( \frac{1}{1+x^k} - e^{-x} \right) \ dx

Problem 273***

Evaluate 0101x1(1xy)log(xy) dx\displaystyle \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \frac{x-1}{(1-xy) \log(xy)} \ dx

Prove all non-* theorems, as before.

Problem 274***

Evaluate 0ex2log(x) dx\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2} \log(x) \ dx

Problem 275***

Evaluate 01x2(log(1+x)(log(x))2+π2) dx\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^2} \left( \frac{\log(1+x)}{(\log(x))^2+\pi^2} \right) \ dx
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 1926
Original post by Mladenov

Problem 165***

Evaluate 02x4(x2+1)(x(2x)3)14dx\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2} \frac{x^{4}}{(x^{2}+1)(x(2-x)^{3})^{\frac{1}{4}}}dx.

Not sure this is right as my final answer looks messy, so let me know.

Solution 165

Let x2xx \mapsto 2x:

02(x2+1)(x21)+1(x2+1)(x(2x)3)14 dx=02(x21(x(2x)3)14+1(x2+1)(x(2x)3)14) dx[br]=014x21x14(1x)34 dxα+011(4x2+1)(x(1x)3)14 dxβ\displaystyle \int_0^2 \frac{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)+1}{(x^{2}+1)(x(2-x)^{3})^{\frac{1}{4}}} \ dx = \int_0^2 \left( \frac{x^2-1}{(x(2-x)^3)^{\frac{1}{4}}}+\frac{1}{(x^2+1)(x(2-x)^3)^{\frac{1}{4}}} \right) \ dx [br]\displaystyle \underbrace{= \int_0^1 \frac{4x^2-1}{x^{\frac{1}{4}}(1-x)^{\frac{3}{4}}} \ dx}_{\alpha} + \underbrace{\int_0^1 \frac{1}{(4x^2+1)(x(1-x)^3)^{\frac{1}{4}}} \ dx}_{\beta}

Comparing the integrals to the Beta function, using the Gamma function representation of the Beta function as well as Euler's reflection formula, we get:

α=401x74(1x)34 dx01x14(1x)34 dx=4B(114,14)B(34,14)[br]=138Γ(114)Γ(14)=13π8sin(π4)=13π28\displaystyle \alpha = 4 \int_0^1 x^{\frac{7}{4}}(1-x)^{-\frac{3}{4}} \ dx - \int_0^1 x^{-\frac{1}{4}} (1-x)^{-\frac{3}{4}} \ dx = 4 B \left(\frac{11}{4},\frac{1}{4} \right) - B \left(\frac{3}{4},\frac{1}{4} \right) [br]\displaystyle = \frac{13}{8} \Gamma \left(1-\frac{1}{4} \right) \Gamma \left(\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{13 \pi}{8 \sin(\frac{\pi}{4})}=\frac{13 \pi \sqrt{2}}{8}

Let x1x+1x \mapsto \frac{1}{x+1} and then xx4x \mapsto x^4:

β=01(x+1)2(1(4(x+1)2+1)(x3(x+1)4)14) dx=0x+1x34(x2+2x+5) dx[br]=40x4+1x8+2x4+5 dx\displaystyle \beta = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{(x+1)^2} \left( \frac{1}{(\frac{4}{(x+1)^2}+1)( \frac{x^3}{(x+1)^4})^{\frac{1}{4}}} \right) \ dx = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x+1}{x^{\frac{3}{4}}(x^2+2x+5)} \ dx [br]\displaystyle = 4 \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^4+1}{x^8+2x^4+5} \ dx

Splitting the denominator into its complex routes and integrating:

=12[{w:w8+2w4+5=0}log(xw)w3]0=12{w:w8+2w4+6=0}log(w)w3=π2(1+i(12i)34+1i(1+2i)34)\displaystyle \begin{aligned} = \frac{1}{2} \left[\sum_{ \{w : w^8+2w^4+5=0 \} } \frac{\log(x-w)}{w^3} \right]_0^{\infty} = -\frac{1}{2} \sum_{ \{w: w^8+2w^4+6=0 \} } \frac{\log(-w)}{w^3}=-\frac{\pi}{2} \left( \frac{1+i}{(-1-2i)^{\frac{3}{4}}} + \frac{1-i}{(-1+2i)^{\frac{3}{4}}} \right) \end{aligned}

Simplifying the result as much as we can and combining α\alpha and β\beta, we get:

02x4(x2+1)(x(2x)3)14 dx=π(1328+534(211+155210(25115))14)\displaystyle \int_0^2 \frac{x^4}{(x^2+1)(x(2-x)^{3})^{\frac{1}{4}}} \ dx = \pi \left(\frac{13 \sqrt{2}}{8}+5^{-\frac{3}{4}} \left( \frac{2}{-11+15 \sqrt{5}-2 \sqrt{10(25-11 \sqrt{5})}} \right)^{-\frac{1}{4}} \right) \square
Original post by Jkn
γ:=limn(k=1n1klog(n))\displaystyle \gamma := \lim_{n \to \infty} \left( \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}-\log(n) \right) which is known as the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Problem 271
***

Prove that 0exlog(x) dx=Γ(1)=ψ(1)=γ\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x} \log(x) \ dx = \Gamma'(1) =\psi(1) = -\gamma.

Note that I require you to prove any non-* theorems/results that you use in your proof.


Does that include proof of differentiation under the integral sign?
Reply 1928
Original post by Felix Felicis
Does that include proof of differentiation under the integral sign?

Sorry, no! I suppose I meant non-** theorems. Essentially I am asserting that ψ(1)=γ\psi(1)=-\gamma is not quotable :smile:
Reply 1929
Sort of a mixture between the last two solutions but I thought the route it leads down seems different enough to warrant a post:

Solution 168
(3)

Beginning as in solution (1), we can deduce that
0π2lnsinxlncosx dx=π2ln22160π2ln2tanx dx=tanxxπ2ln22160ln2x1+x2 dx\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \ln \sin x \ln \cos x \ dx = \frac{\pi}{2} \ln^2 2 - \frac{1}{6} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \ln^2 \tan x \ dx \mathop =^{\tan x \mapsto x} \frac{\pi}{2} \ln^2 2- \frac{1}{6} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} \ dx \end{aligned}

Let I(α)=0xα1+x2 dx=x2x120xα121+x dx=12B(α+12,1α2)=12Γ(α+12)Γ(1α+12)\displaystyle \begin{aligned} I(\alpha) = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{\alpha}}{1+x^2} \ dx \mathop =^{x^2 \mapsto x} \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{\frac{\alpha-1}{2}}}{1+x} \ dx = \frac{1}{2} B \left(\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{1-\alpha}{2} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \Gamma \left( \frac{\alpha+1}{2} \right) \Gamma \left( 1-\frac{\alpha+1}{2} \right) \end{aligned}
=π2cscπ2(α+1)\displaystyle= \frac{\pi}{2} \csc \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1)

0xαln2x1+x2 dx=π2d2dα2cscπ2(α+1)=π38(cscπ2(α+1)cot2π2(α+1)+csc3π2(α+1))\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{\alpha} \ln^2 x}{1+x^2} \ dx = \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{d^2}{d \alpha^2} \csc \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1) = \frac{\pi^3}{8} \left(\csc \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1) \cot^2 \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1)+\csc^3 \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1) \right) \end{aligned}

0π2lnsinxlncosx dx=π2ln2216I(0)=π2ln22π348 \displaystyle \Rightarrow \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \ln \sin x \ln \cos x \ dx = \frac{\pi}{2} \ln^2 2 - \frac{1}{6} I''(0) = \frac{\pi}{2} \ln^2 2 - \frac{\pi^3}{48} \ \square

We can generalise the last integral in a rather interesting way:

0π2lnntanx dx=0lnnx1+x2 dx=π2dndαncscπ2(α+1)α=0=πn+12n+1dndαncscαα=π2\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \ln^n \tan x \ dx = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\ln^n x}{1+x^2} \ dx = \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{d^n}{d \alpha^n} \csc \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha+1) \Bigg|_{\alpha=0} = \frac{\pi^{n+1}}{2^{n+1}} \frac{d^n}{d \alpha^n} \csc \alpha \Bigg|_{\alpha=\frac{\pi}{2}} \end{aligned}

We now note the Taylor's series of cscx\csc x about x=π2x=\frac{\pi}{2}
cscx=k=0(1)k(2k)!E2k(zπ2)2k\displaystyle \csc x = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{(2k)!}E_{2k} \left(z-\frac{\pi}{2} \right)^{2k} for zπ2<π2|z-\frac{\pi}{2}|<\frac{\pi}{2} where EnE_n denotes the nth Euler number.

By considering the coefficients of this series, we can find closed forms for the above integral:

0lnnx1+x2 dx=(1)n2Enπn+12n+1\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\ln^n x}{1+x^2} \ dx = \frac{(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}} E_{n} \pi^{n+1}}{2^{n+1}} for all nN n \in \mathbb{N}^{*}.

Note that this implies that the above integral is equal to 0 whenever n is odd (this is implied both by the Taylor's series and the fact that all nth Euler numbers are 0 when n is odd).

So, for example, 0ln8x1+x2 dx=1385π929\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\ln^8 x}{1+x^2} \ dx = \frac{1385 \pi^9}{2^9}

Corollary: Letting n=0 gives us yet another way to deduce that 011+x2 dx=E0π2=π2\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{1+x^2} \ dx = \frac{E_0 \pi}{2}=\frac{\pi}{2}
(edited 10 years ago)
Solution 274

Let I=0ex2lnx dx=xx140x12exlnx dxI = \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} \ln x \ dx \overset{x \mapsto \sqrt{x}}= \frac{1}{4} \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{-\frac{1}{2}} e^{-x} \ln x \ dx

Now, consider the gamma function:

Γ(λ)=0xλ1ex dx    Γ(λ)=0λxλ1ex dx=0xλ1exlnx dx\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \Gamma (\lambda) = \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{\lambda - 1} e^{-x} \ dx \implies \Gamma ' (\lambda ) & = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda} x^{\lambda - 1} e^{-x} \ dx \\ & = \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{\lambda - 1} e^{-x} \ln x \ dx \end{aligned}

which evaluated at λ=12\lambda = \frac{1}{2} gives 4I4I

We have that

ψ(λ)=Γ(λ)Γ(λ)    Γ(λ)=ψ(λ)Γ(λ)    Γ(12)=Γ(12)ψ(12)=π(γ+2ln2)=4I\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \psi (\lambda ) = \dfrac{\Gamma ' (\lambda)}{\Gamma ( \lambda )} \implies \Gamma ' (\lambda ) & = \psi (\lambda ) \Gamma (\lambda ) \\ \implies \Gamma ' \left( \dfrac{1}{2} \right) & = \Gamma \left( \dfrac{1}{2} \right) \psi \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) \\ & = - \sqrt{\pi} \left( \gamma + 2 \ln 2 \right) = 4 I \end{aligned}

0ex2lnx dx=14π(γ+2ln2)\displaystyle \therefore \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} \ln x \ dx = - \frac{1}{4} \sqrt{\pi} \left( \gamma + 2 \ln 2 \right)
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 1931
Original post by Felix Felicis
x

Nice stuff man, don't you just love gamma functions, DUTIS and all that crap? :biggrin:

Btw, do you like my two monster posts? :colone:
Original post by Jkn
Nice stuff man, don't you just love gamma functions, DUTIS and all that crap? :biggrin:

Btw, do you like my two monster posts? :colone:

Gotta love it man, it's some good stuff :sogood:

I do! Very nice :colone: I especially liked the extension to 168 :biggrin: And while I'm at it, I was looking through some old stuff and saw your method on analysing the Gaussian integral, that was quite nice too :biggrin:
Reply 1933
Original post by Felix Felicis
Gotta love it man, it's some good stuff :sogood:

I do! Very nice :colone: I especially liked the extension to 168 :biggrin: And while I'm at it, I was looking through some old stuff and saw your method on analysing the Gaussian integral, that was quite nice too :biggrin:

Ikr! You're going to absolutely destroy at uni next year. Are you applying (or should I saying going) to Cambridge and, if so, which college? :tongue:

Thanks man! :biggrin: I've got into the habit of extending everything now, it's so satisfying! I've fallen in love with Euler's reflection formula btw! :biggrin: I was messing about with the problem as I was trying to work through Mladenov's contour integration method, and then I though I would ass that to the mix. I then thought that I probably looked like a bit of a dick as I was bringing nothing new to the table and then realised that, whist repeated differentiation tends to be tedious, the Taylor's series was an awesome shortcut! :biggrin: We don't use Taylor's (or Laurent) series enough on this thread, perhaps you could dig up some fun questions?

Cheers but I felt like a bit of an idiot right after I finished as I realised that it was entirely unnecessary given the fact that all I had to do was use a trigonometric substitution to trivially evaluate the appropriate value of the Beta function (though I left it there as the digamma method of evaluating that integral was interesting in itself :colondollar:). Incidentally, it was that precise integral that was the entirety of STEP II Q2 2013 (which makes it really satisfying that I found it of my own accord) :smile:

I'm looking forward to being taught how to evaluate the Gaussian next year :lol: I'll stroll up like "yeah I found like 10 ways to do this ever the summer :pierre:"

I hope we are not being too narrow by being obsessed with integration and special functions..

Oh, btw, if you liked some of those posts you might like the one I wrote about the E-M constant (etc..) a few pages back on ASOM :smile:
Problem 276

(simple one, really)

if u+v=50u+v=50 which choice of both uu and vv make u×vu \times v as large as posilble?
Original post by Hasufel
Problem 276

(simple one, really)

if u+v=50u+v=50 which choice of both uu and vv make u×vu \times v as large as posilble?


Two numbers which add to make 50 can be written in the form (25+k),(25-k) so that their product is:

(25+k)(25k)=625k2 (25+k)(25-k) = 625 - k^2

Clearly for this to be maximised k=0 (since a square is either positive or 0). Hence the largest product is 625.
Original post by Hasufel
Problem 276

(simple one, really)

if u+v=50u+v=50 which choice of both uu and vv make u×vu \times v as large as posilble?

Solution 276:
I say:
u=(25+ni),v=(25ni)u=(25+ni) , v=(25-ni) where n is extraordinarily large.
As:
limn(25+ni)(25ni)=\lim_{n \to \infty}(25+ni)(25-ni) = \infty
yet:
u+v=50u+v=50
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Hasufel
Problem 276

(simple one, really)

if u+v=50u+v=50 which choice of both uu and vv make u×vu \times v as large as posilble?


Am I being silly? Can't you just change u×vu \times v into u×(50u)u \times (50-u), then just maximize this to get 625625?
Original post by joostan
I say:
u=(25+ni),v=(25ni)u=(25+ni) , v=(25-ni) where n is extraordinarily large.
As:
limn(25+ni)(25ni)=\lim_{n \to \infty}(25+ni)(25-ni) = \infty
yet:
u+v=50u+v=50


I prefer to keep it real :biggrin:.
Problem 276 *

Evaluate 02π1esinx+1dx\displaystyle \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{1}{e^{\sin x}+1}\,dx

Spoiler

Quick Reply

Latest