The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA4 - Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 2640
Original post by getback339
image.jpgIs this the best way to do these kind of questions? Jan 12, question 15 multiple choice? Thanks


That's how I do them. You can also use the fact that the ratio of the charges/masses is equal to the ratio of the distances squared, then square root (obviously negative root isn't applicable in this case), then you have a linear equation.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
That's how I do them. You can also use the fact that the ratio of the charges/masses is equal to the ratio of the distances squared, then square root (obviously negative root isn't applicable in this case), then you have a linear equation.


Posted from TSR Mobile


thanks!
Reply 2642
Original post by getback339
thanks!


No problem!


Posted from TSR Mobile
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433581053.371429.jpg

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433581067.682465.jpg

Why do I not include the radius of the earth in this? I thought newtons law was the graviational force of attraction the centre of 2 masses??

Thanks


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2644
Original post by gcsestuff
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433581053.371429.jpg

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433581067.682465.jpg

Why do I not include the radius of the earth in this? I thought newtons law was the graviational force of attraction the centre of 2 masses??

Thanks


Posted from TSR Mobile


The orbit distance takes into account the radius.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Hi I don't suppose anyone knows the answer to 2 a i)

The answers aren't in the back of the book. And this one confused me. Is it to do with electric field strength being proportional to potential difference?

Thanks

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
The orbit distance takes into account the radius.


Posted from TSR Mobile


So if I ever see the word orbit, that means from the centre of the earth?



Posted from TSR Mobile
i am had the same dream hahaha
Original post by gcsestuff
I thought this too! But surely that would be to easy for a 6 marker ??


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2648
Original post by _Caz_
Hi I don't suppose anyone knows the answer to 2 a i)

The answers aren't in the back of the book. And this one confused me. Is it to do with electric field strength being proportional to potential difference?

Thanks

Posted from TSR Mobile


Yup! You assume it's a uniform field between the two plates.

[br]E=Vd[br][br]E = \dfrac{V}{d}[br]

So increasing the potential difference means a greater E.

As the force on the charge (treating the shuttle ball as a point charge here) is proportional to E:

[br]F=EQ[br][br]F = EQ[br]

Then that means that a greater force is experienced, causing a larger change in momentum with each impact between the two walls, giving the effect that the shuttle oscillates faster :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2649
Original post by gcsestuff
So if I ever see the word orbit, that means from the centre of the earth?



Posted from TSR Mobile


I would interpret that, yeah. But I've emailed my teacher to make sure - I'll let you know what he says!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
Yup! You assume it's a uniform field between the two plates.

[br]E=Vd[br][br]E = \dfrac{V}{d}[br]

So increasing the potential difference means a greater E.

As the force on the charge (treating the shuttle ball as a point charge here) is proportional to E:

[br]F=EQ[br][br]F = EQ[br]

Then that means that a greater force is experienced, causing a larger change in momentum with each impact between the two walls, giving the effect that the shuttle oscillates faster :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile


thank you! :smile:
Reply 2651
Original post by _Caz_
thank you! :smile:


No worries :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile


Just out of curiosity, what grade are you aiming for in physics (if you don't mind me asking)?
Original post by theoriginalrpr
i am had the same dream hahaha


Was this about resonance?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
I would interpret that, yeah. But I've emailed my teacher to make sure - I'll let you know what he says!


Posted from TSR Mobile


Thanks!! You've helped me so much!! If I see a similar question I'll see what it says


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2655
Original post by _Caz_
Just out of curiosity, what grade are you aiming for in physics (if you don't mind me asking)?


Minimum B

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2656
Original post by CD223
[br]P=ΔEΔt[br][br]P = \dfrac{\Delta E}{\Delta t}[br]

[br]P=0.5×50×106×(30×103)25×103[br][br]\therefore P = \dfrac{0.5 \times 50 \times 10^{-6} \times (30 \times 10^{3})^2}{5 \times 10^{-3}}[br]

[br]P=4.5MW[br][br]\therefore P = 4.5 \text{MW}[br]


Posted from TSR Mobile


I never knew you could do it using this method.... I always used the rms equations
Reply 2657
Original post by _Caz_
Just out of curiosity, what grade are you aiming for in physics (if you don't mind me asking)?


An A hopefully! Need AAA for uni. You?:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2658
Original post by gcsestuff
Thanks!! You've helped me so much!! If I see a similar question I'll see what it says


Posted from TSR Mobile


Sure! No problem.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2659
Original post by sykik
I never knew you could do it using this method.... I always used the rms equations


I see! Yeah power as the rate of energy transfer is so useful!


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending