The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA4 - Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by wat a wizard
0.19 for induced emf?


I got 0.19!! Was you flux linkage like 0.0605 wb or something like that also?
Original post by chizz1889
Average I got 0.0475. Worked out what I was at 90• (0.0950) then divided by 2 ☺️ (Think I may have needed to divide by root2 though as I think RMS applies


It said average emf induced, i don't know if that means rms or not
Reply 4062
Original post by king cobra
It was to the power of -6 not -5


Posted from TSR Mobile


-5 i think you must've done 2.78x10-9 in your calculations instead of 2.78x10-8 if using whole values
I enjoyed the MC quite a bit, but section B was a nightmare for me...
Grade boundary predictions?
Original post by king cobra
0.12 was right I think


Posted from TSR Mobile


I put 0.12v!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Alright guys I drew my graph like this

1434019524377.jpg

I think in probably wrong because the initial current (y axis) would be lower.

Thoughts?
Original post by chizz1889
I really liked that paper, I know I got the one about which statement isn't correct about the gravitational potential wrong. Also all the damping but wrong and the curve as I forgot to use a shallower gradient but pretty sure I got the rest of the marks. What was the answer to number of electrons? I got 2.2*10^10, not sure if that's right 😊

EDIT: I also dropped a mark on the electric field strength one as my final answer wasn't negative 😓


Think i done the same thing, also i got 4.4x10^10 😓
Original post by DannySmith420
What did people get fir the hight lifted by the capacitor motor? Becuase i got 1.9m using mgh and the energy stored


It gave you weight instead of mass, maybe you went wrong there?

I think the energy stored was roughly 4.8J = mgh = Wh
H = 4.8/3.5 = 1.4
Original post by Fred Cantoni
I put 0.12v!



Same I got 0.12 V as the emf.
Original post by johnny147
Here's my answers to the objective test:

DAADABCBABACDCACCDBABACBC[/QUOT

I got 15 mathching
Original post by k9000
-5 i think you must've done 2.78x10-9 in your calculations instead of 2.78x10-8 if using whole values


Wasn't the next one based on this one ?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by fruity97
I got 0.19!! Was you flux linkage like 0.0605 wb or something like that also?

Yes, i got that
Original post by MSB47
you reckon they'll penalise me for putting the field strength to two sig figs (1.6x10^3)?


I do not think they'll penalise you.
They usually have 2 sf written in the mark scheme
[QUOTE="johnny147;56877845"]Here's my answers to the objective test:

DAADABCBABACDCACCDBABACBC[/QUOTE

I got 15 mathching
Original post by QueNNch
Alright guys I drew my graph like this

1434019524377.jpg

I think in probably wrong because the initial current (y axis) would be lower.

Thoughts?


I believe your current has to be half or 1/2000 depending if it was a typo or not, the your gradient should be shallower a time constant increases!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by QueNNch
Alright guys I drew my graph like this

1434019524377.jpg

I think in probably wrong because the initial current (y axis) would be lower.

Thoughts?

That's what I did but I wasn't sure if the initial current changed
Original post by QueNNch
Alright guys I drew my graph like this



I think in probably wrong because the initial current (y axis) would be lower.

Thoughts?


Well the question said 150 ohms in the first part and 300k ohms in the second, It might be a mistake so AQA might remove the mark for intercept?
Original post by imyimy
1.4m for energy stored by capacitor= mgh?
0.06 Wb Turns for a question about magnetic fields, and the emf as 0.12V for second part (think thats wrong)

circular motion Qs
130 degrees
T=15N (think thats wrong)
2 revolutions


6 marker
talked about constant speed but accelerating ..change in direction so velocity etc.. so F=MA newtons second law = mv2/r, then some stuff about resolving tension horizontally and vertically with MG acting downwards etc, and newtons laws about opposite and equal force and no resultant force=0 if nothing else acting on it at rest/constant velocity...


I got 15N at first for tension! But I remember changing it towards the end to 12N because I didn't include the weight I think? Stil not sure which is right but they said horizontal so I changed it
Original post by DanTheMan358
Think i done the same thing, also i got 4.4x10^10 😓


I put 2.2x10^10 cause the total number of electrons would be 4.4x10^10 but half would already be on that plate, and the other half moves over from the other plate when they're is a potential difference? Anyone confirm or deny this?


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending