I guess, there's nothing wrong with it... but again, you go from
sin to
sin2 when it makes more sense to do it the other way around since
H(θ) is dependent on
sin2, so you want THIS minimised which means
sin2=0 and this IMPLIES
sin=0Maybe I'm just being pedantic here and I doubt you would lose ANY marks for this, but to minimise
H you should notice that first saying "min of
sin" then going onto "min of
sin2" doesn't flow very nicely because the min of
sin is -1 (not 0 as you claim) and this value does NOT minimise
H. Whereas if you went from saying first "min of
sin2" (which is 0 and minimised H first of all) IMPLIES "min of
sin" (which is also 0 as a result) then it makes sense. It's more logical this way.
All in all, this bit just lacks argument as to WHY
sin(3θ+1.10714...) is picked as 0 and not its minimum which would be -1.