The Student Room Group

STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions

Scroll to see replies

Reply 120
another way of doing the last part is to consider the range [0,1] and [1,infinite], and we have x^2/(1+x)<x^2 for 0<x<1, and x^2/(1+x)<x^2/x=x for x>1 , and these integral can be calculated, so give the answer.


Original post by kabbers
III/1:

Sketch y=x2exx+1y = \frac{x^2 e^{-x}}{x+1}

I'm not going to bother posting most of the differentiating legwork, there arent too many tricks, its just an algebra bash.

Differentiating (quotient rule is your friend), we get

dydx=exx(2x2)(x+1)2\frac{dy}{dx} = e^{-x}\frac{x(2-x^2)}{(x+1)^2}

So we have turning points at x = 0, and x = +2,2+\sqrt{2}, -\sqrt{2}


Differentiating again, we get

d2ydx2=ex(23x2)(x+1)22(x+1)(2xx3)(2xx3)(x+1)2(x+1)4\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2} = e^{-x}\frac{(2-3x^2)(x+1)^2 - 2(x+1)(2x-x^3) - (2x - x^3)(x+1)^2}{(x+1)^4}

Substituting in values of x for the turning points, we find that x = 0 is a minimum, and the other two maximums.


Noticing the denominator of y, we find that there is an asymptote at x = -1.

And because of the exponential properties of e^-x, y tends to zero as x+x \to +\infty

y tends to -\infty as xx \to -\infty since the numerator remains positive and given the exponenential properties of e^x much greater than the denominator, while the denominator becomes negative.


So the graph will look http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11883448&postcount=14



Prove 0<0x2ex1+xdx<1\displaystyle 0 < \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^2 e^{-x}}{1+x} dx < 1

First note that x2x+1=x2+xx+1xx+1=xxx+1=x(x+1x+11x+1)=x1+1x+1\frac{x^2}{x+1} = \frac{x^2+x}{x+1} - \frac{x}{x+1} = x - \frac{x}{x+1} = x - (\frac{x+1}{x+1} - \frac{1}{x+1}) = x - 1 + \frac{1}{x+1}

Hence we may split the integral into 0(x1)exdx+01x+1exdx\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 (x - 1)e^{-x} dx + \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx

Consider 0(x1)exdx\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 (x - 1)e^{-x} dx

=0xexdx0exdx= \displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 xe^{-x} dx - \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx

=([xex]0+0exdx0exdx= \displaystyle([-xe^{-x}]^{\infty}_0 + \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx - \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx

=0= 0


Now consider 01x+1exdx\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx

I posit the inequality 1x+1ex<ex\frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} < e^{-x} for x > 0

1x+1<1\frac{1}{x+1} < 1
1<(x+1)1 < (x+1)
0<x0 < x

So our inequality holds.

So:

01x+1exdx<0exdx\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx

01x+1exdx<[ex]0\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < [-e^{-x}]^{\infty}_0

01x+1exdx<1\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < 1

Thus 0(x1)exdx+01x+1exdx<1\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 (x - 1)e^{-x} dx + \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < 1

And therefore, 0x2ex1+xdx<1\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^2 e^{-x}}{1+x} dx < 1


Now notice that the graph of y=x2ex1+xy = \frac{x^2 e^{-x}}{1+x} is greater than 0 for x > 0, and hence so is the infinite integral.

So, 0<0x2ex1+xdx<1\displaystyle 0 < \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^2 e^{-x}}{1+x} dx < 1

please point out any mistakes :smile:
(edited 4 years ago)
Reply 121
exm,i find a error in the last part. v1=1 so that t1=1/2, so the final result should be half as yours
Original post by squeezebox
STEP III - Question 2

aun+2+bun+1+cun=0au_{n+2} + bu_{n+1} + cu_{n} = 0

If un=Aαn+Bβn u_{n} = A\alpha^{n} + B\beta^{n}, where α\alpha and β\beta satisfy ax2+bx+c=0()ax^{2} + bx +c = 0 (*), then aun+2+bun+1+cun=aAαn+2+aBβn+2+bAαn+1+bBβn+1+cAαn+cBβn=Aα(aα2+bα+c)+Bβn(aβ2+bβ+c)=0au_{n+2} + bu_{n+1} + cu_{n} = aA\alpha^{n+2} + aB\beta^{n+2} + bA\alpha^{n+1} + bB\beta^{n+1} + cA\alpha^{n} + cB\beta^{n} = A\alpha( a\alpha^{2} + b\alpha + c) + B\beta^{n}(a\beta^{2} + b\beta + c) = 0 . (as alpha and beta satisfy (*).)

So the difference equation is satisfied by un=Aαn+Bβnu_{n} = A\alpha^{n} + B\beta^{n}, for all A,B.

We also need:

u0=A+B u_{0} = A+B and u1=Aα+Bβ u_{1} = A\alpha + B\beta , and so:

B=u1αu0βα B = \frac{u_{1} - \alpha u_{0}}{ \beta - \alpha} and A=u1βu0αβ A = \frac{u_{1} - \beta u_{0}}{\alpha - \beta}.

~~~~~~~~~

Define unu'_{n} to be a possible solution, so that ununu'_{n} \neq u_{n}. And define also: wn=unun w_{n} = u_{n} - u'_{n}.

Suppose that wk1=wk=0w_{k-1} = w_{k}=0. We shall show that wk+1=0w_{k+1} =0

We have:
Unparseable latex formula:

u_{k-1} - u_'{k-1} = 0

and
Unparseable latex formula:

u_{k} - u_'{k} = 0

.

Now: auk+1+buk+cuk=0au_{k+1} + bu_{k} + cu_{k} = 0 and auk+1+buk+cuk=0.au'_{k+1} + bu'_{k} + cu'_{k} = 0.

awk+1+bwk+cwk=0\Rightarrow aw_{k+1} + bw_{k} + cw_{k} = 0

wk+1=0\Rightarrow w_{k+1} = 0, as wk=wk1=0 w_{k} = w_{k-1} = 0.

Also, for the determined values of A and B, the fist two terms are u0andu1u_{0} and u_{1}, and so there is no alternative u0u'_{0} and u1u'_{1}. Hence by induction, un u_{n} are the only solutions.

~~~~~~~~

Put vn=(n+1)tnv_{n} = (n+1)t_{n}.

Then you get: (n+1)(n+2)(n+3)[8tn+22tn+1tn]=0(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)[ 8t_{n+2} - 2t_{n+1} - t_{n}] = 0

8tn+22tn+1tn=0\Rightarrow 8t_{n+2} - 2t_{n+1} - t_{n} = 0 .

Let the roots of this difference equation be p and q. So from the first part, p and q must satisfy: 8x22x1=0 8x^{2} -2x -1 = 0, whose roots are: 12and14\frac{1}{2} and \frac{-1}{4}.

So let p be 0.5, and so q = -0.25. Then tn=C(12)n+D(14)n t_{n} = C(\frac{1}{2})^{n} + D(\frac{-1}{4})^{n}. Where C = t1qt0pq\frac{t_{1} - q t_{0}}{ p -q} and D = t1pt0qp\frac{t_{1} - p t_{0}}{ q-p}.

So tn=43(12)n43(14)nt_{n} = \frac{4}{3}(\frac{1}{2})^{n} -\frac{4}{3}(\frac{-1}{4})^{n} .

Hence: vn=(n+1)[43(12)n43(14)n]v_{n} = (n+1)[\frac{4}{3}(\frac{1}{2})^{n} -\frac{4}{3}(\frac{-1}{4})^{n}].
Reply 122
the induction is godd, but there is another better way of doing that
for the part 2, Sn+1=(1+k)Sn -d, so Sn+1-d/k=(1+k)(Sn-d/k), take it as an geometric sequence we have
ST+m=(1+k)m(ST-d/k)+d/k , the result will soon get.
Original post by kabbers
relatively straightforward q, pointing out any mistakes will be appreciated as always :smile:

Ok first note that at the end of day n, the firm will owe everything it owed the previous day, the interest on this plus everything it has borrowed that day.

This may be expressed as Sn+1=(1+k)Sn+c\displaystyle S_{n+1} = (1+k)S_n + c

By evaluating the first few terms of this sequence, it becomes easy to 'guess' and then prove a total value for Sn:

S0=0\displaystyle S_0 = 0

S1=c\displaystyle S_1 = c

S2=(1+k)c+c=c((1+k)+1)\displaystyle S_2 = (1+k)c + c = c((1+k) + 1)

S3=(1+k)((1+k)c+c)+c=c((1+k)2+(1+k)+1)\displaystyle S_3 = (1+k)((1+k)c + c) + c = c((1+k)^2 + (1+k) + 1)


ok my guess is that Sn=cr=0n1(1+k)r=c(1+k)n1(1+k)1=c(1+k)n1k\displaystyle S_n = c \sum^{n-1}_{r=0} (1+k)^r = c \frac{(1+k)^n - 1}{(1+k) - 1} = c \frac{(1+k)^n - 1}{k} (by geometric series)

this fits the questions, but we have to prove it (induction!)


Basis case: S0=c(1+k)01k=0\displaystyle S_0 = c \frac{(1+k)^0 - 1}{k} = 0, therefore the basis case works.

Inductive step: Sn+1=(1+k)Sn+c=(1+k)c(1+k)n1k+c=c((1+k)(1+k)n1k+1)\displaystyle S_{n+1} = (1+k)S_n + c = (1+k)c \frac{(1+k)^n - 1}{k} + c = c((1+k)\frac{(1+k)^n - 1}{k} + 1)

=c((1+k)n+1(k+1)k+1)=c((1+k)n+1(k+1)+kk)=c(1+k)n+11k)\displaystyle = c(\frac{(1+k)^{n+1} - (k+1)}{k} + 1) = c(\frac{(1+k)^{n+1} - (k+1) + k}{k}) = c\frac{(1+k)^{n+1} - 1}{k})

This is in the same form as the above, so it works.


for part 2, firstly we can assert that ST=c(1+k)T1k)\displaystyle S_T = c\frac{(1+k)^{T} - 1}{k}) (this is the initial amount owed)

the firm must pay interest on what it owes then pay back what it has earned.

ST+m+1=(1+k)ST+md\displaystyle S_{T+m+1} = (1+k)S_{T+m} - d

Again, let's try a few values:

ST+1=(1+k)STd\displaystyle S_{T+1} = (1+k)S_T - d

ST+2=(1+k)((1+k)STd)d=(1+k)2STd(1+k)d\displaystyle S_{T+2} = (1+k)((1+k)S_T - d) - d = (1+k)^2 S_T - d(1+k) - d

ST+3=(1+k)((1+k)((1+k)STd)d)d=(1+k)3STd(1+k)2d(1+k)d\displaystyle S_{T+3} = (1+k)((1+k)((1+k)S_T - d) - d) - d = (1+k)^3 S_T - d(1+k)^2 - d(1+k) - d

hypothesis: ST+m=(1+k)mSTdr=0m1(1+k)r\displaystyle S_{T+m} = (1+k)^m S_T - d\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}(1+k)^r

=(1+k)mSTd(1+k)m1k=(1+k)m(STdk)+dk\displaystyle = (1+k)^m S_T - d\frac{(1+k)^m - 1}{k} = (1+k)^m(S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k} (again by geometric)


we need to prove this, again by induction.

basis case: when m = 0, ST=(1+k)0(STdk)+dk=ST\displaystyle S_T = (1+k)^0 (S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k} = S_T basis works

inductive step: ST+m+1=(1+k)ST+md=(1+k)((1+k)m(STdk)+dk)d\displaystyle S_{T+m+1} = (1+k)S_{T+m} - d = (1+k)((1+k)^m(S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k}) - d

=(1+k)m+1(STdk)+(1+k)dkd\displaystyle = (1+k)^{m+1}(S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + (1+k)\frac{d}{k} - d

=(1+k)m+1(STdk)+dk+dd\displaystyle = (1+k)^{m+1}(S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k} + d - d

=(1+k)m+1(STdk)+dk\displaystyle = (1+k)^{m+1}(S_T - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k}

Hence the sum works. However the question did not ask for us to express S_T, so we must substitute in (see our above def. for S_T)


ST+m=(1+k)m(c(1+k)T1kdk)+dk\displaystyle S_{T+m} = (1+k)^m(c\frac{(1+k)^{T} - 1}{k} - \frac{d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k}

ST+m=(1+k)m(c(1+k)T1dk)+dk\displaystyle S_{T+m} = (1+k)^m(c\frac{(1+k)^{T} - 1 - d}{k}) + \frac{d}{k}

ST+m=ck(k+1)T+mc+dk(k+1)m+dk\displaystyle S_{T+m} = \frac{c}{k} (k+1)^{T+m} - \frac{c+d}{k}(k+1)^m + \frac{d}{k}



for part 3, note that if the sequence is decreasing, the firm will pay off its debt. so the conditions are:

ST+m+1<ST+m\displaystyle S_{T+m+1} < S_{T+m}

ck(k+1)T+m+1c+dk(k+1)m+1+dk<ck(k+1)T+mc+dk(k+1)m+dk\displaystyle \frac{c}{k} (k+1)^{T+m+1} - \frac{c+d}{k}(k+1)^{m+1} + \frac{d}{k} < \frac{c}{k} (k+1)^{T+m} - \frac{c+d}{k}(k+1)^m + \frac{d}{k}

Letting x = k+1


ckxT+m+1c+dkxm+1+dk<ckxT+mc+dkxm+dk\displaystyle \frac{c}{k} x^{T+m+1} - \frac{c+d}{k}x^{m+1} + \frac{d}{k} < \frac{c}{k} x^{T+m} - \frac{c+d}{k}x^m + \frac{d}{k}

ckxT+m+1c+dkxm+1<ckxT+mc+dkxm\displaystyle \frac{c}{k} x^{T+m+1} - \frac{c+d}{k}x^{m+1} < \frac{c}{k} x^{T+m} - \frac{c+d}{k}x^m

taking everything on to one side


xT+m(ckxck)xm(c+dkxc+dk)<0\displaystyle x^{T+m}(\frac{c}{k}x - \frac{c}{k}) - x^m(\frac{c+d}{k}x-\frac{c+d}{k}) < 0

(x1)(ckxT+mc+dkxm)<0\displaystyle (x-1)(\frac{c}{k}x^{T+m} - \frac{c+d}{k}x^m) < 0

xm(x1)(ckxTc+dk)<0\displaystyle x^m(x-1)(\frac{c}{k}x^{T} - \frac{c+d}{k}) < 0

k+1 > 0, so both x^m and (x-1) are greater than zero. Therefore, for the inequality to be satisfied,

ckxTc+dk<0\displaystyle \frac{c}{k}x^{T} - \frac{c+d}{k} < 0

cxT(c+d)<0\displaystyle cx^{T} - (c+d) < 0

xT1<dc\displaystyle x^{T} - 1 < \frac{d}{c}

(1+k)T1<dc\displaystyle (1+k)^{T} - 1 < \frac{d}{c} as required.
Reply 123
instead of expressing tan ,we can express sin directly by vx、vy(original resolving speed of the first ball),then write t as vx/vy,we get an expression of sin in t .next step is quite easy,whether to differentiate or use the Cauchy inequality
Original post by Dirac Spinor
STEP III Q12
Let u1/u1,v1/v1,v2/v2 \mathbf{u_1}/u_1, \mathbf{v_1}/v_1, \mathbf{v_2}/v_2 be the velocities/speeds of ball 1 and 2 with u being before the collision and v after.
Momentum is conserved in a closed system so:
u1=v1+v2\mathbf{u_1}=\mathbf{v_1}+\mathbf{v_2}
The coefficient of restitution is < 1 so kinetic energy is not conserved amongst the two balls, i.e:
u1.u1>v1.v1+v2.v2\mathbf{u_1}.\mathbf{u_1}> \mathbf{v_1}.\mathbf{v_1}+ \mathbf{v_2}.\mathbf{v_2}
Combining the two:
(v1+v2)2>v12+v222v1.v2>0[br]2v2v1cosϕ>0ϕ<π2(\mathbf{v_1}+\mathbf{v_2})^2 > \mathbf{v_1}^2+\mathbf{v_2}^2 \Rightarrow 2\mathbf{v_1}.\mathbf{v_2}>0[br]\Rightarrow 2v_2v_1cos\phi>0 \Rightarrow \phi < \frac{\pi}{2}
Where ϕ\phi is the angle between the two velocities as desired.
For the next part, let θ\theta be the angle between u1andv2\mathbf{u_1}\\and\\\mathbf{v_2}.Separating momentum into two components and and considering restitution in the direction of v2 \mathbf{v_2} we obtain 3 equations, sufficient to eliminate the three speeds and obtain an equation in terms of our two angles, thus confirming the intuitive idea that the initial velocity of the first ball is irrelevant:
u1cosθ=v2+v1sinϕ[br]u1sinθ=v1sinϕ[br]eu1cosθ=v2v1cosθu_1cos\theta=v_2+v_1sin\phi[br]u_1sin\theta=v_1sin\phi[br]eu_1cos\theta=v_2-v_1cos\theta
By adding the first and last and substituting, we obtain:
Unparseable latex formula:

(1+e)u_1cos\theta=2v_2[br]\Rightarrow (1+e)cot\theta sin\phi v_1=2(eu_1cos\theta+v_1cos\phi)[br]\Rightarrow (1+e)cot\theta sin\phi =2ecot\thetasin\phi+2cos\phi[br]\Rightarrow (1-e)cot\theta=2cot\phi[br]\Rightarrow tan\theta=\frac{1-e}{2}tan\phi



The angle of deflection is ϕθ \phi-\theta which we shall call k. Consider
Unparseable latex formula:

tank=\frac{tan\phi-tan\theta}{1+tan\phitan\theta}=tan\theta \frac{(1+e)/(1-e)}{1+(2/(1-e))Tan^2\theta}


Notice that the maximum of Tank will occur for the same value of theta as the maximum of k so, differentiating both sides w.r.t. theta we get:

D[tan(k)]=(1+(2/(1e))Tan2θ)((1+e)sec2θ)((1+e)tanθ)(2/(1e)2tanθsecθ)(1+(2/(1e))Tan2θ)2D[tan(k)]=\frac{(1+(2/(1-e))Tan^2\theta)((1+e)sec^2\theta)-((1+e)tan\theta)(2/(1-e)2tan\theta sec^\theta)}{(1+(2/(1-e))Tan^2\theta)^2}
Which, if we equate it to zero, gives us:
(1+21eTan2θ)(1+e)sec2θ=(1+e)tanθ21e2tanθsec2θ[br]1+21eTan2θ=41eTan2θ[br]tan2θ=1e2(1+\frac{2}{1-e}Tan^2\theta)(1+e)sec^2\theta=(1+e)tan\theta \frac{2}{1-e}2tan\theta sec^2\theta[br]\Rightarrow 1+\frac{2}{1-e}Tan^2\theta=\frac{4}{1-e}Tan^2\theta[br]\Rightarrow tan^2\theta=\frac{1-e}{2}
So:
Tan(max[k])=max[Tan(k)]=1e2(1+e)/(1e)2=sin(kmax)1sin2(kmax)[br][br](1sin2(kmax))2=4sin2(kmax)(1e)(1+e)2[br](4(1e)(1+e)2+12)sin2(kmax)=12[br]sin2(kmax)=(2(1+e)28(1e)+(1+e)2)12=(1+e)2(3e)2[br]kmax=sin1(1+e3e)Tan(max[k])=max[Tan(k)]=\sqrt{\frac{1-e}{2}}\frac{(1+e)/(1-e)}{2}=\frac{sin(k_{max})}{\sqrt{1-sin^2(k_{max})}}[br][br]\Rightarrow \frac{(1-sin^2(k_{max}))}{2}=\frac{4sin^2(k_{max})(1-e)}{(1+e)^2}[br]\Rightarrow (\frac{4(1-e)}{(1+e)^2}+\frac{1}{2})sin^2(k_{max})=\frac{1}{2}[br]\Rightarrow sin^2(k_{max})=(\frac{2(1+e)^2}{8(1-e)+(1+e)^2})\frac{1}{2}= \frac{(1+e)^2}{(3-e)^2} [br]\Rightarrow k_{max}=\sin^{-1}(\frac{1+e}{3-e})
as required.

Comment: I found this Q particularly difficult and it has taken me many attempts to get it right. Comments are welcome.
Reply 124
I think the derivative of what braineverit get is right? f'(b)=pi-2/a*√a2+b2 rather than having the 2/a*a√2 term for we should differentiating w.r.t. b
but for the final result, pi2/4-1>1 so we should choose a???
Original post by mikelbird
I am afraid I disagree with this result...see attached file...
(edited 4 years ago)
I think you are absolutely right...cannot recall what on earth I was thinking about!!
Original post by cxs
I think the derivative of what braineverit get is right? f'(b)=pi-2/a*√a2+b2 rather than having the 2/a*a√2 term for we should differentiating w.r.t. b
but for the final result, pi2/4-1>1 so we should choose a???
Reply 126
Original post by mikelbird
I think you are absolutely right...cannot recall what on earth I was thinking about!!


🤨😀
only trouble is that the given answer makes b greater then a!!!!
Original post by cxs
🤨😀
Reply 128
Original post by mikelbird
only trouble is that the given answer makes b greater then a!!!!


Is that an official answer of just someone did it?
(P.S. I think this question is a good idea.Begin daydreaming:h:ope this year STEP questions will have this kind of questions haha.stop daydreaming))
Ihave corrected my version, pointed out the contradion of the answer and offered an alternative solution....see if you like it..!
Original post by cxs
Is that an official answer of just someone did it?
(P.S. I think this question is a good idea.Begin daydreaming:h:ope this year STEP questions will have this kind of questions haha.stop daydreaming))
Reply 130
This ALT. is brilliant!
Original post by mikelbird
Ihave corrected my version, pointed out the contradion of the answer and offered an alternative solution....see if you like it..!
Reply 131
ALT. for Paper I, Q3
If we start from the given answer, i.e. start from root6-root2, we can soon find that it is constructed as an equilateral triangle, thus we let P'Q'O denotes this triangle. Now we prove that if P, Q is elsewhere, then it should be smaller.
Let the square be OABC clockwise. Notice that if there is a P, Q such that it is larger than root6-root2, then P, Q can not lie in the triangle OP'Q', OAP', ODQ', for the longest length of a segment in these triangles is root6-root2. So PQ must lie in the triangle CP'Q'. However, the longest segment is also root6-root2, thus it is a contradiction.
Reply 132
ALT for Paper I, Q7 (As there is something unclear to the original solution)
The key part: To show |f'(x)|<=4 for |x|<=1:
f'(x)=f(1)(x+1/2)+f(-1)(x-1/2)-2f(0)x, so that f'(x)<=1*|x+1/2|+1*|x-1/2|+2
Consider |x+1/2|+|x-1/2| for |x|<=1, it is easy to see that it is no larger than 2.
Then we are done.
Original post by SimonM
Why aren't group theory questions in STEP any more :'(

Because they don't teach group theory at GCSE anymore
Original post by brianeverit
1988 Paper 2 number 8


I think there might be a mistake to the last part. Because the behavior at large values ,
for:
***note the equal are more like approximate signs

a/b = 1 : then A(n+1) = A(n) and B(n+1) = B(n)
a/b = 3/2: then A(n+1) = (3/4)*(A(n)) and A(n+1) = (3/4)*(A(n))
and say for example a/b = 2, then B(n+1) is negative

Hence, I propose the solution to be
b> (3/2)*a : extinct at infinity
between b>(3/2)*a and a=b : equilibrium
b < a : extinct at finite value

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
(edited 4 years ago)
Reply 135
1988 STEP 1 14
Could anyone explain the answer for me? I don't understand the existing one.
Reply 136
Original post by brianeverit
Here are 10, 11,12,13,14, and 16 on Paper I

Could you explain your answer of 14 clearly? I don't understand it.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending