Turn on thread page Beta

Explanation for 'Mr White' thread yesterday. watch

    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by endorf)
    we all know what you have said about many members, not just me, and i have the evidence to hand if you attempt to deny it.
    Why would I deny it - I've moaned about you, dazya, the narbs, gnostic, Mr Hewins and probably a few other spammers/trolls/idiots.

    I do find your enraged self righteous attitude to be quite funny though...anyone would imagine you were mr innocent :rolleyes:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by LS.)
    Hmm...lack of 'informed concent' and 'protection of the participant from physical/mental damage.'

    I'm just bitter because I didn't want to be psycho-analysed
    You weren't psycho-analysed so to speak. The paper requirements dealt with 'social' aspects. How people grouped together to argue the point etc. Was there any collaboration or segmentation? Stuff like that.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by endorf)
    this is a frankly disgusting attempt at saving face, too late for that im afraid. we all know what you have said about many members, not just me, and i have the evidence to hand if you attempt to deny it. the fact is you are bitter and twisted and have used your position in the subscriber forum to insight hatred against other members.

    lol true
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pencil Queen)
    Why would I deny it - I've moaned about you, dazya, the narbs, gnostic, Mr Hewins and probably a few other spammers/trolls/idiots.

    I do find your enraged self righteous attitude to be quite funny though...anyone would imagine you were mr innocent :rolleyes:
    Prehaps you would like to tell us why you think endorf is an idiot. I think that now he would admit that his original thread that incited much hatred was misconcieved however since then he has calmed his manner considerablely since then.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pencil Queen)
    Why would I deny it - I've moaned about you, dazya, the narbs, gnostic, Mr Hewins and probably a few other spammers/trolls/idiots.

    I do find your enraged self righteous attitude to be quite funny though...anyone would imagine you were mr innocent :rolleyes:
    i hold the moral highground here, anything i have said previously which could be deemed offensive has been said in public, not in the private *****ing room which is f51. and i think the use of the term "a few" in your defence is wishful thinking. i will have no problem in blowing the whistle on your shananigans even if it does mean i get banned.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pencil Queen)
    Why would I deny it - I've moaned about you, dazya, the narbs, gnostic, Mr Hewins and probably a few other spammers/trolls/idiots.
    glad to see youre now saying what you really think about me, out in the open.

    I do find your enraged self righteous attitude to be quite funny
    i wouldnt.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by endorf)
    maybe it is down to the uncovering of the subscriber scandal ?? not as clean cut as you like to appear are you Pencil Queen.
    Obsessed?
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sire)
    You weren't psycho-analysed so to speak. The paper requirements dealt with 'social' aspects. How people grouped together to argue the point etc. Was there any collaboration or segmentation? Stuff like that.
    Ah, that's good to know. Btw, good luck with the paper
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lord Huntroyde)
    Obsessed?
    i dont know, the subscriber forum started two threads specifically about me and a 'plot' in the last 24hrs, id say so.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Speciez99)
    he is talking to PQ not you so ignore it
    ah righto, I missed that. Cheers mate. *shrugs* didn't realise that this thread would become a ****ging match between one of the most respected members of the forum and someone I've not seen many decent posts from. By the way, does anyone know how the trial of Saddam Hussein is going?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sire)
    By the way, does anyone know how the trial of Saddam Hussein is going?
    badly?
    • Very Important Poster
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by vienna95)
    glad to see youre now saying what you really think about me, out in the open.
    I don't believe I've said anything offensive towards you. I may have moaned about how I like to avoid debating with you as I find you a very frustrating person to debate with.

    And I did actually come to you defense at the start of the moaning thread and gave a possible reason for your (at the time) apparant opting out of true debate.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sire)
    ah righto, I missed that. Cheers mate. *shrugs* didn't realise that this thread would become a ****ging match between one of the most respected members of the forum and someone I've not seen many decent posts from. By the way, does anyone know how the trial of Saddam Hussein is going?
    Certian issues are on the fore front of some people's agenda at the moment, and the trial so-so i guess.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by vienna95)
    i dont know, the subscriber forum started two threads specifically about me and a 'plot' in the last 24hrs, id say so.
    Really? Which ones?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pencil Queen)
    I don't believe I've said anything offensive towards you. I may have moaned about how I like to avoid debating with you as I find you a very frustrating person to debate with.

    And I did actually come to you defense at the start of the moaning thread and gave a possible reason for your (at the time) apparant opting out of true debate.
    hehe, i dont think you know where to draw the line.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by vienna95)
    badly?
    Badly for Saddam, or just a mockery of a trial in general?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lord Huntroyde)
    Really? Which ones?
    hehe, youre the subscriber!
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by vienna95)
    hehe, your the subscriber!
    I know, but I can't find them.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sire)
    Badly for Saddam, or just a mockery of a trial in general?

    weren't you meant to be leaving yesterday?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sire)
    Badly for Saddam, or just a mockery of a trial in general?
    both, although leaning toward the latter.
 
 
 
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.