This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- how to revise historu a level?
- NEA History Aqa
- Subjects for Oxbridge History and Politics
- What is better to take into A-lvl`s (What is better for the university?)
- history a level revision
- Studying Law at Uni vs. Doing a Conversion Course
- Oxford or Cambridge for Social Sciences
- How do Oxford students feel their interviews went?
- eduqas english predictions
- A-Level Gap Year Which Subject do i take?
- Finishing one A level a year later
- Don Gratton House 2023
- What to do ??
- Have I been too aspirational?
- Law Conversion (GDL)??
- Out-of-character grades and resits for Cambridge?
- Could I go to Oxford?
- oxbridge gsce grades
- English Lit Application
- lsbu dental therapy/dental hygiene
History dons!
Can anyone whose currently at Cambrige (probably a history student) tell me which of the colleges have the best director of studies for history or best set of history teaching fellows? ...(or even know anything about some of them?)...I am in the process of choosing a college to apply to and figured that the quality of those who would be in charge of my course is a good start. I quite like eccentric teachers. and humourous ones. e.g proffessor crawford for law at jesus, but for history. mainly out of
1. Pembroke
2. Emma
selwyn, queens, corpus christi, Jesus, Downing, Caius or any other reaonably central college.
P.s. any positive or negative comments on any of those colleges? and should I pick a college with a better JCR than pembroke? does it matter?
Anyway, enough, Thanks!
1. Pembroke
2. Emma
selwyn, queens, corpus christi, Jesus, Downing, Caius or any other reaonably central college.
P.s. any positive or negative comments on any of those colleges? and should I pick a college with a better JCR than pembroke? does it matter?
Anyway, enough, Thanks!
Scroll to see replies
Cambridge doesn't have dons.
You might start here: a list of history faculty members; beside each name you'll find his field of interest, and very often you can click on the name of the faculty member you're interested in and read his biography. Or you can start from this page, which is organized by subject matter, and from there see which colleges have concentrations of fellows in the field you're most interested in. I'd say it's better to choose a college to apply to on this basis, rather than on the putative friendliness or eccentricity of this or that fellow. It's hard to gauge precisely how you'll interact with a person based on other people's views of him, so it's best to get in contact with a few directors of studies once you've narrowed it down by these or other means.
You might start here: a list of history faculty members; beside each name you'll find his field of interest, and very often you can click on the name of the faculty member you're interested in and read his biography. Or you can start from this page, which is organized by subject matter, and from there see which colleges have concentrations of fellows in the field you're most interested in. I'd say it's better to choose a college to apply to on this basis, rather than on the putative friendliness or eccentricity of this or that fellow. It's hard to gauge precisely how you'll interact with a person based on other people's views of him, so it's best to get in contact with a few directors of studies once you've narrowed it down by these or other means.
Pembroke rocks.....!! 
I'm reading History at Sidney Sussex. We came top for History last year and have a pretty good reputation for the subject. Our DoS is Martin Ruehl, if you want to look him up. He says that Caius, Emma and Peterhouse are particularly strong for History too. I also went on open days at Selwyn, Newnham and Pembroke if you want to know more about those colleges. On the whole I wouldn't worry too much about the fellows at each college as you will receive tuition from all different colleges. My supervisors have come from Sidney, Peterhouse, Homerton, King's, Christ's and Tit Hall. The Director of Studies is someone you will have more contact with, however, so I can see why you would want to look them up in particular. Here's what I can tell you.
SIDNEY: Martin Ruehl (intellectual thought/Europe). An excellent teacher and very helpful. Always tries his best for his students. We also have Richard Partington (medievalist), the Admissions Director, who is very willing to answer questions and is actively involved in the GHP sessions run in college. Both are quite young.
SELWYN: David Smith (Stuart expert). Supremely nice. Ooh, or it could be John Morrill. He's good too.
KING'S: Stephen Alford (Tudor guru). The loveliest man in the faculty, really friendly and helpful. Young.
PEMBROKE: Paul Warde (EM Europeanist). The best lecturer in the faculty. Seems very nice, quite young.
TIT HALL: Clare Jackson (Tudors). She is very helpful and generally very nice. Really good at helping you with any problems. Will push you hard and you'll be VERY grateful.
PETERHOUSE: can't remember her name either. She's young and nice.
NEW HALL: again, can't remember her name. Has been very good.
NEWNHAM: Gill Sutherland. Will push you hard but is excellent.
Hmmm, I seem to think all the DoSes are nice. I guess that's their job! But anyway, if you have any other questions about History at Cambridge PM me. I'll get back to you ASAP, but my exams are 3-13 June so bear with me if I don't respond immediately.
In terms of colleges themselves, they're more alike than not usually. The easiest way to narrow them down is to consider size, age and location. I wanted a reasonably old, small, central college - Sidney fitted the bill! Open days are also a good idea. Pembroke, Selwyn and Newnham were very similar to Sidney (with the obvious exception that Newnham is women only) but Sidney had a different atmosphere that I could only pick up from the open day. Lots of people talk about colleges clicking, and that was true for me. Again, if you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them.
SIDNEY: Martin Ruehl (intellectual thought/Europe). An excellent teacher and very helpful. Always tries his best for his students. We also have Richard Partington (medievalist), the Admissions Director, who is very willing to answer questions and is actively involved in the GHP sessions run in college. Both are quite young.
SELWYN: David Smith (Stuart expert). Supremely nice. Ooh, or it could be John Morrill. He's good too.
KING'S: Stephen Alford (Tudor guru). The loveliest man in the faculty, really friendly and helpful. Young.
PEMBROKE: Paul Warde (EM Europeanist). The best lecturer in the faculty. Seems very nice, quite young.
TIT HALL: Clare Jackson (Tudors). She is very helpful and generally very nice. Really good at helping you with any problems. Will push you hard and you'll be VERY grateful.
PETERHOUSE: can't remember her name either. She's young and nice.
NEW HALL: again, can't remember her name. Has been very good.
NEWNHAM: Gill Sutherland. Will push you hard but is excellent.
Hmmm, I seem to think all the DoSes are nice. I guess that's their job! But anyway, if you have any other questions about History at Cambridge PM me. I'll get back to you ASAP, but my exams are 3-13 June so bear with me if I don't respond immediately.
In terms of colleges themselves, they're more alike than not usually. The easiest way to narrow them down is to consider size, age and location. I wanted a reasonably old, small, central college - Sidney fitted the bill! Open days are also a good idea. Pembroke, Selwyn and Newnham were very similar to Sidney (with the obvious exception that Newnham is women only) but Sidney had a different atmosphere that I could only pick up from the open day. Lots of people talk about colleges clicking, and that was true for me. Again, if you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them.
really! aren`t we pedantic..but it would seem i picked up the term from somewhere - as i was browsing through the sidney prospectus i ran into this nifty paragraph:
Finally, what you should remember throughout is that very good candidates (and, indeed, very good dons) do occasionally make a mess of an interview; when this happens allowances are made. Don't forget that it is our responsibility too that the interview goes well, not just yours!
ahh well..spose some people must use it in refernce to cambridge as well. but what do i know
Finally, what you should remember throughout is that very good candidates (and, indeed, very good dons) do occasionally make a mess of an interview; when this happens allowances are made. Don't forget that it is our responsibility too that the interview goes well, not just yours!
ahh well..spose some people must use it in refernce to cambridge as well. but what do i know
Ticki
I'm reading History at Sidney Sussex. We came top for History last year and have a pretty good reputation for the subject. Our DoS is Martin Ruehl, if you want to look him up. He says that Caius, Emma and Peterhouse are particularly strong for History too. I also went on open days at Selwyn, Newnham and Pembroke if you want to know more about those colleges. On the whole I wouldn't worry too much about the fellows at each college as you will receive tuition from all different colleges. My supervisors have come from Sidney, Peterhouse, Homerton, King's, Christ's and Tit Hall. The Director of Studies is someone you will have more contact with, however, so I can see why you would want to look them up in particular. Here's what I can tell you.
SIDNEY: Martin Ruehl (intellectual thought/Europe). An excellent teacher and very helpful. Always tries his best for his students. We also have Richard Partington (medievalist), the Admissions Director, who is very willing to answer questions and is actively involved in the GHP sessions run in college. Both are quite young.
SELWYN: David Smith (Stuart expert). Supremely nice. Ooh, or it could be John Morrill. He's good too.
KING'S: Stephen Alford (Tudor guru). The loveliest man in the faculty, really friendly and helpful. Young.
PEMBROKE: Paul Warde (EM Europeanist). The best lecturer in the faculty. Seems very nice, quite young.
TIT HALL: can't remember her name, but she is very helpful and generally very nice. Will push you hard.
PETERHOUSE: can't remember her name either. She's young and nice.
NEW HALL: again, can't remember her name. Has been very good.
NEWNHAM: Gill Sutherland. Will push you hard but is excellent.
Hmmm, I seem to think all the DoSes are nice. I guess that's their job! But anyway, if you have any other questions about History at Cambridge PM me. I'll get back to you ASAP, but my exams are 3-13 June so bear with me if I don't respond immediately.
In terms of colleges themselves, they're more alike than not usually. The easiest way to narrow them down is to consider size, age and location. I wanted a reasonably old, small, central college - Sidney fitted the bill! Open days are also a good idea. Pembroke, Selwyn and Newnham were very similar to Sidney (with the obvious exception that Newnham is women only) but Sidney had a different atmosphere that I could only pick up from the open day. Lots of people talk about colleges clicking, and that was true for me. Again, if you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them.
SIDNEY: Martin Ruehl (intellectual thought/Europe). An excellent teacher and very helpful. Always tries his best for his students. We also have Richard Partington (medievalist), the Admissions Director, who is very willing to answer questions and is actively involved in the GHP sessions run in college. Both are quite young.
SELWYN: David Smith (Stuart expert). Supremely nice. Ooh, or it could be John Morrill. He's good too.
KING'S: Stephen Alford (Tudor guru). The loveliest man in the faculty, really friendly and helpful. Young.
PEMBROKE: Paul Warde (EM Europeanist). The best lecturer in the faculty. Seems very nice, quite young.
TIT HALL: can't remember her name, but she is very helpful and generally very nice. Will push you hard.
PETERHOUSE: can't remember her name either. She's young and nice.
NEW HALL: again, can't remember her name. Has been very good.
NEWNHAM: Gill Sutherland. Will push you hard but is excellent.
Hmmm, I seem to think all the DoSes are nice. I guess that's their job! But anyway, if you have any other questions about History at Cambridge PM me. I'll get back to you ASAP, but my exams are 3-13 June so bear with me if I don't respond immediately.
In terms of colleges themselves, they're more alike than not usually. The easiest way to narrow them down is to consider size, age and location. I wanted a reasonably old, small, central college - Sidney fitted the bill! Open days are also a good idea. Pembroke, Selwyn and Newnham were very similar to Sidney (with the obvious exception that Newnham is women only) but Sidney had a different atmosphere that I could only pick up from the open day. Lots of people talk about colleges clicking, and that was true for me. Again, if you have any questions I'll do my best to answer them.
Tit Hall = Clare Jackson
Ooh, and if you are into the Tudor/Stuart periods, Pembroke also has Dr Lauren Kassell, 'a specialist in Tudor and Stuart social and intellectual history who also contributes to classes in general historical problems.'
http://www.pem.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/courses/history.html
http://www.pem.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/courses/history.html
White_redrose
Ooh, and if you are into the Tudor/Stuart periods, Pembroke also has Dr Lauren Kassell, 'a specialist in Tudor and Stuart social and intellectual history who also contributes to classes in general historical problems.'
http://www.pem.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/courses/history.html
http://www.pem.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/courses/history.html
She'll take students from outside Pembroke though. The historians at a given college shouldn't really sway your decision because you will have the opportunity to be taught by them whether you're at their college or not. Considering whether you'll get on with the DoS (very hard to predict, in all fairness) is slightly more useful.
I was revising last night and came across Clare Jackson's lecture notes. It reminded me to tell you that she is a big cheese for Tudor politics - she and Stephen Alford wrote the paper. My friend and I have had them for supervisors and were rather pleased with the questions that came up!
DoSes are usually quite keen to supervise people from their college so if they're amazing at a paper you want to do (Jackson or Alford for Paper 4, Ruehl for Papers 17-20) that could be an advantage.xx_ambellina_xx
Tit Hall = Clare Jackson
Merci - mind was a bit numb from all the revision. Should have remembered as I went to her lectures on Kingship only last term! (That and my friend is Tit Hall's History Society President. And had her as a supervisor. And has mentioned her on more than one occasion. I'm losing it!)
Ticki
Merci - mind was a bit numb from all the revision. Should have remembered as I went to her lectures on Kingship only last term! (That and my friend is Tit Hall's History Society President. And had her as a supervisor. And has mentioned her on more than one occasion. I'm losing it!)
lol only too happy to help. She's lovely isn't she? Well, she was in my interview anyway.
Related discussions
- how to revise historu a level?
- NEA History Aqa
- Subjects for Oxbridge History and Politics
- What is better to take into A-lvl`s (What is better for the university?)
- history a level revision
- Studying Law at Uni vs. Doing a Conversion Course
- Oxford or Cambridge for Social Sciences
- How do Oxford students feel their interviews went?
- eduqas english predictions
- A-Level Gap Year Which Subject do i take?
- Finishing one A level a year later
- Don Gratton House 2023
- What to do ??
- Have I been too aspirational?
- Law Conversion (GDL)??
- Out-of-character grades and resits for Cambridge?
- Could I go to Oxford?
- oxbridge gsce grades
- English Lit Application
- lsbu dental therapy/dental hygiene
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Oxbridge applicants for modern languages - 2025 entry (applying in 2024)University of Oxford
62
116
Last reply 1 month ago
Any Oxford Phil & Theo applicants heard back about interviews?
