The Student Room Group

Aqa chem4 15th june 2011 (resit) thread

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1060
Original post by T-Toe
was that all that you had to mention?


You also have to mention the value for cyclohexatriene is 3 times cyclohexene and why
Original post by JK471993
Damn! I just realised I put Na2CO3, not NaH!


Na2CO3 works aswell :wink:
Reply 1062
Original post by T-Toe
Benzen ene benzene is -120kj mol-1
so we'd assumed that a benzene triene would be -360KJ mol-1 (3x-120)
However benzene have a enthaply change of about -220 KJ mol-1 (forget the exact enthaply change)

Therefore benzene is more stable than benzene triene.

Did you mention any of this? :smile:

It was 6 marks and I'm not sure what else to add..so I also think I've lost marks too :|

edit - I added equations too


Wasn't this question 4 marks? I didn't know this either!! NOPE, mentioned NONE of that, I talked about the benzene ring and the delocalised electrons! Pure guess as I stupidly didn't go over this :frown: :frown:

I was talking about the cyclohexene reagents one towards the end! Reagents and mechanism for 6 marks - steps 3 and 4. Argh, got it completely wrong :/
Reply 1063
Original post by sam_xo
Wasn't this question 4 marks? I didn't know this either!! NOPE, mentioned NONE of that, I talked about the benzene ring and the delocalised electrons! Pure guess as I stupidly didn't go over this :frown: :frown:

I was talking about the cyclohexene reagents one towards the end! Reagents and mechanism for 6 marks - steps 3 and 4. Argh, got it completely wrong :/


Ohhhhhhh lool sorry. My recollection of yesterday's exam is diminishing.

I think you'll actually get 2 marks for that. Someone told me you were supposed to mention that.

Ohh, I did stretch my head for that one.
Reply 1064
Original post by T-Toe
Ohhhhhhh lool sorry. My recollection of yesterday's exam is diminishing.

I think you'll actually get 2 marks for that. Someone told me you were supposed to mention that.

Ohh, I did stretch my head for that one.


Haha no worries, I'm quite bad at remembering questions have exams too :smile:

Ah not so bad :/ But the 6 mark one, ah I was gutted as I knew the answer for the mechanisms but I mistaken it for an aromatic compound and went down the H2/Ni route :frown: :frown:
Reply 1065
Original post by sam_xo
Did you put purple AND yellow or purple TO yellow? Cos' it said colour change? :s-smilie:


I just put 'yellow'...

Would i lose the mark? It didn't mention that the indicator was purple to start with (although it was alkali - but they didn't say they had tested it b4 adding acid?) so i just put yellow, hope i dont get it wrong, that would be a bit harsh...
Reply 1066
Original post by T-Toe
Benzen ene benzene is -120kj mol-1
so we'd assumed that a benzene triene would be -360KJ mol-1 (3x-120)
However benzene have a enthaply change of about -220 KJ mol-1 (forget the exact enthaply change)

Therefore benzene is more stable than benzene triene.

Did you mention any of this? :smile:

It was 6 marks and I'm not sure what else to add..so I also think I've lost marks too :|

edit - I added equations too


i wrote that too! then i subtracted it and wrote something about there being a -152KJ difference?
Original post by Zakir
I just put 'yellow'...

Would i lose the mark? It didn't mention that the indicator was purple to start with (although it was alkali - but they didn't say they had tested it b4 adding acid?) so i just put yellow, hope i dont get it wrong, that would be a bit harsh...


I put the same :frown:
hope they dont mark that as wrong :mad:
Original post by al_habib
dynamic equilibrium is it rate of forward reaction=rate of backward reaction, all the states are similar. will this gain me 2mks


no, you had to put the reaction of forwards and backwards reactions are equal
AND so there are no changes in the concentrations of reactants or products.
Original post by sumsam
i wrote that too! then i subtracted it and wrote something about there being a -152KJ difference?


it said explain it too, so you had to mention the delocalised electrons making it exist in a more stable state.
Original post by neo-apollo
no, you had to put the reaction of forwards and backwards reactions are equal
AND so there are no changes in the concentrations of reactants or products.


Me being a genious wrote the ABSOLUTE opposite of this.

How? Because i thought of static and dynamic IP's. So I thought 'dynamic' means changing....... Oh my im such an idiot :frown:
Reply 1071
Original post by neo-apollo
it said explain it too, so you had to mention the delocalised electrons making it exist in a more stable state.


yeah!:biggrin: i feel a it better now hoping i got atleast 2 or 3 out of those 4 marks! :smile: i NEED that A in chemistry
Original post by sam_xo
Haha no worries, I'm quite bad at remembering questions have exams too :smile:

Ah not so bad :/ But the 6 mark one, ah I was gutted as I knew the answer for the mechanisms but I mistaken it for an aromatic compound and went down the H2/Ni route :frown: :frown:


You went down the right route! if it was aromatic you would use Sn/Hcl to reduce it :smile:
Original post by starburst92
You went down the right route! if it was aromatic you would use Sn/Hcl to reduce it :smile:


I think they mean it was the wrong reaction, it was an hexene not a Benzene as a lot of people thought.
Original post by Casshern1456
I think they mean it was the wrong reaction, it was an hexene not a Benzene as a lot of people thought.


Ohh rightt. So would you do electrophillic addition with Hbr. Then nucleophillic substitution with excess Nh3?
Original post by starburst92
Ohh rightt. So would you do electrophillic addition with Hbr. Then nucleophillic substitution with excess Nh3?


Apparently so and the reaction was actually easy if they had made it clear. I still think AQA are abit weird and now loads of students are going to lose mark for that Question.

including me
Original post by Casshern1456
Apparently so and the reaction was actually easy if they had made it clear. I still think AQA are abit weird and now loads of students are going to lose mark for that Question.

including me


Thats what I wrote :biggrin: probably the only marks I got in that exam. :/ But I do agree that the question was really weird. They intentionally set out to trick people with that one. The least they could've done was name the compound so people wouldn't confuse it with benzene.
Original post by neo-apollo
no, you had to put the reaction of forwards and backwards reactions are equal
AND so there are no changes in the concentrations of reactants or products.


you mean i wont even earn a mark
Original post by al_habib
you mean i wont even earn a mark


Dont worry about it. as long as you got your other stuff right you will be fine :smile:
Reply 1079
Original post by starburst92
Thats what I wrote :biggrin: probably the only marks I got in that exam. :/ But I do agree that the question was really weird. They intentionally set out to trick people with that one. The least they could've done was name the compound so people wouldn't confuse it with benzene.


I know, I hated the way they did that to trick you! 6 marks is like 10 UMS :frown: :frown: So annoying!

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending