Pornography Should Be Banned!

That was my point, it wouldn't though, because the stat would have a majority of "people" being over 18.

That was my point, the stat wouldn't at all imply that on average, a class of 16-17 year olds could have 1/20 drug users, as you suggested.

And yes Phil, I think I can debate in the sub-forum.

Sigh. Have you ever thought it would be possible not to have your little arguments and do something constructive like meet up (since you do live a ridiculous four piffly miles from each other) and develop a nice friendship?

Sigh. Have you ever thought it would be possible not to have your little arguments and do something constructive like meet up (since you do live a ridiculous four piffly miles from each other) and develop a nice friendship?

Possibly hoping for too much and living in my cloud of happiness with no exams looming. I'll stick to Economics. G'way...

Good, then you have made your point clear.

Neithere did I imply what you thought as well, it was an OBSERVATION statement. Compared with the RAW data, with otehr factors ignored.

Of course I am well aware of any other factors.

I did offer him the use of the PM service. In ALL of our "debates"

You are hoping for too much, but still aim for the sun and all that...

But you said that according to the stat, your class would have (on average) 1/20 taking drugs. You then proceeded to say that it is infact 5/20.

I appreciate that it was an observation, but I didn't see the link for you to say "according to the stat". The stat doesn't really let you make such a comparion of this "1/20" in teh first place really.

Oh, you just wait. I'll make bono apply to Cambridge and then you can meet each other at interviews Yes, he could do...erm, engineering. It's not really debate, more like kiddie squabbling.

Oh, you just wait. I'll make bono apply to Cambridge and then you can meet each other at interviews Yes, he could do...erm, engineering. It's not really debate, more like kiddie squabbling.

Come on guys, if it was anyone else, you wouldn't be picking on these minor details. I'm fine with it, but do you have to do it in every single thread the other person posts in?

Quite cute though

Yes, but chances are, he won't get in as he only does Maths and Physics. No third science which is so highly desirable for Natural Sciences. Engineering is a lot more likely, I think.

Do you have to pick on everything I write too?

I'll admit that I've never glanced at the Science pages of my prospectus before today

So you now know that I'm right.

Anyway, why are we having a discussion about the hypothetical subjects he could study at Cambridge when he's going to apply for Physics at Oxford?

Gah, you've avoided my point! Bono's subjects fit Engineering a lot better than NatSci! Gods, you're so bloody infuriating.

*fumes*

Anyway, why are we having a discussion about the hypothetical subjects he could study at Cambridge when he's going to apply for Physics at Oxford?

Now you know how it feels to be "debating" with another person who has a particular thought train?

You started it, dearie.

You have to accept that though.

Like drugs, pornography can be very addictive and damaging. Furthermore, pornography can be an agent of marital breakdown, where one member becomes "hooked". Many of the "actors/actresses" become involved in the industry because of exploitation, and many get STDs.

Do you agree?