Madeleine McCann - Your Opinion.

With Madeleine McCann's parents now back in the news over a suing involving an ex-police chief involving £427000 of fines (Including interest) the whole conspiracy and story behind the case is back in my mind.

So I've opened up this topic to hear your guys opinions of the matter, as a student of Law myself it would be interesting to read your opinions and add them into my blog.

I'm not assuming anything, I'm being devils advocate, you two are refusing the possibility of them being involved, despite them being a suspect at one point.

I didn't have any suspicions before the appearance of certain pieces of evidence, but suspicions are less than a presumption.

It is irrational and naive to ignore evidence and then count the lack of evidence as a sign of innocence.

.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about and have deeply sinister intentions for how justice should be carried out.

Stop making things up. I am not ignoring the Dog. I have written multiple times about it.

However, there are multiple things that contradict what the Dog is saying.

You are choosing to ignore those and still claim that it is "irrational" to ignore what the Dog is saying in the face of other evidence.

The lack of supporting evidence is not evidence to the contrary. I haven't ignored anything, you haven't posted any evidence at all, in favour of any conclusion.

this is so true. people watch several episodes of CSI and Holby City then top up this learning with some nonsense off the David Icke website and voila they are experts in criminology.

Sorry but it is.

If someone claims I killed OJs wife, the fact there is no evidence I did it, is evidence I didn't do it.

The same way, the fact, that there is no forensic evidence that a murder took place is evidence that a murder did not take place in the apartment.

1. 6pm she was seen

2. When did they report her missing?

3. Who saw them in between these two times?

4. What could they have done in between without anyone seeing including the other kids?

5. In that time where did they manage to hide the body so well? I strongly assume post telling true police they would have little opportunity to hide it well before a search was undertaken.

If someone can provide answers to this and they show they did in fact have time to kill her and get rid of her, then maybe I could believe they were involved.

Til then I will just view them as pathetic parents who tightly feel guilt and shame for leaving their infant kids alone in a hotel room. If you become a parent there are certain responsibilities, certain things you just can't do anymore. Why do babysitters exist, people can just leave kids at home right? ...


Posted from TSR Mobile

What I meant was, there is no contradicting evidence to support another event taking place.

For them to be innocent, a kidnapper would have had to be involved, or she would of been sighted wandering the streets at night, on her own.

Obviously if there was nothing found at all then everyone would have to admit that no one was guilty.

Just stop changing what you are writing. You sound like a moron.

There is evidence that there was a kidnapping took place. A child disappeared.

No, it's just that it was too late to act on the case, since, he was dead. What was found, was a failure of the judicial system at that time.

From whats come out there surely must have been some sort of conspiracy to cover up what it's alleged Brittan, Janner and Smith were up to, if they didn't do it then surely there must have been some sort of conspiracy to smear them. Private Eye claimed MI5 had done just that back in 1984.

I've not changed my view on anything, either you have a poor grasp of what I was trying to say or I didn't communicate it very well.

OH WOW GREAT! how could I forget... and did this child fall into a black hole?

or did the kidnapper have time to do a quick dust before he left?

I'm finished with you muppets, all you've done is misconstrue me, ridicule me and try to guilt trip me.

A child disappeared. That is evidence that a kidnapping could have taken place. There is also witness evidence.

I would have consult a physicist but a black hole is very unlikely.