Massive civil war predicted in between native Europeans and Muslims

Sikhs, buddhists, hindus and taoists never blew anyone up.
Sikhs, buddhists, hindus and taoists are not the biggest security threat in the uk and Europe.
Sikhs, buddhists, hindus and taoists do not spread hate in their places of worship. Sikhs, buddhists, hindus and taoists are not mirating abroad to fight for some of the most evil organisations in world history such as ISIS

This is a longer discussion than it needs to be. Terrorism is clearly correlated by the amount of Muslims living in the land. Poland, Slovakia and Japan have negligible amounts of Muslims and as a result a negligible/zero amount of terrorism. Therefore it isn't prejudice to want to be minimise the population of Muslims but postjudice.

Any opposing argument you come up with will not change that fact. And before you mention how the West ruined their countries. If you hold Joe public responsible for the actions of our governments then you must hold Muslims also responsible for the negative actions of their own respective governments, which then provides yet another reason to minimise their population in the West.

/thread

This is a longer discussion than it needs to be. Terrorism is clearly correlated by the amount of Muslims living in the land. Poland, Slovakia and Japan have negligible amounts of Muslims and as a result a negligible/zero amount of terrorism. Therefore it isn't prejudice to want to be minimise the population of Muslims but postjudice.

Any opposing argument you come up with will not change that fact. And before you mention how the West ruined their countries. If you hold Joe public responsible for the actions of our governments then you must hold Muslims also responsible for the negative actions of their own respective governments, which then provides yet another reason to minimise their population in the West.

/thread

The reason why Poland and Slovakia isnt targetted is because theyre poor crap countries. Terrorists target rich western countries because it's more relevant and actually causes a stir.

Japan isnt targetted because its in the East.

It can't come soon enough, as far as I'm concerned.

This is a longer discussion than it needs to be. Terrorism is clearly correlated by the amount of Muslims living in the land. Poland, Slovakia and Japan have negligible amounts of Muslims and as a result a negligible/zero amount of terrorism. Therefore it isn't prejudice to want to be minimise the population of Muslims but postjudice.

Any opposing argument you come up with will not change that fact. And before you mention how the West ruined their countries. If you hold Joe public responsible for the actions of our governments then you must hold Muslims also responsible for the negative actions of their own respective governments, which then provides yet another reason to minimise their population in the West.

/thread

Good thing no body is concerned with your opinion.

Prove it.

Why?

Why not? It's such a ridiculous assertion to make, that I'm genuinely interested to see if you have any proof for it.

Like saying you want to see a race war ?
Simple, people don't like fascists such as yourself.

Oh dear. Another one of those "Islam is a race" folk.

Not quite but seeing as the title is between a race and a religion what exactly would you call it, or simply genocide?
You're a rather repellent little person though arent you.

Good thing no body is concerned with your opinion.

So please explain Northern Ireland and the fact until rather recently almost all the terror attacks were done by the Irish in Britain. Then we have the terror attacks by white supremeists like Breivik. the attacks by jews and Christians across the middle east - in particular in Lebanon and Palestine etc.



Next to no terror attacks are perpetrated by the 'muslim governments' so that argument is rather still born.

Sure. The IRA were not an ongoing problem in that in their active period they resulted in roughly 3500 total deaths. Islamic terrorism in its many forms has claimed many millions of deaths, is an ongoing problem and has been going on since the inception of Islam.
You can glom onto the only examples you can think up like Breivik, but the magnitude is nowhere near comparable so requires no explanation.

Could you provide examples of these Christian terrorists you speak of? In regards to Jews I consider their attacks defensive in nature.

I was not necessarily referring to terrorist attacks condoned by Muslim governments although they would be counted, but more the atrocities that are condoned and happen under their watch. Aka Sharia law etc.

Not content to spew bigotry you insist on spewing spurious bigotry at that? cute.
No Breivik is just one of the more well known cases. There is a never ending list coming out of Africa and Asia of christian terror.


Shall we start with the crusades move on to Shatila and Sabra then on to that delightful man Breivik etc. etc. etc.
That is because you're a racist and know absolutely nothing about Israels numerous crimes against humanity. There is nothing defensive about laying seige to Beirut, bombing hospitals and schools, pancaking apartment blocks, funding fascist terror groups, bombing the UN and shelling civillian towns. Your attempt to excuse the inexcusable is revolting.

Is that so. Pray tell what your view on Western governments terror is then? My god there has been enough of it.
'aka sharia law etc' thats rather droll. Would you care to give an actual example as opposed to some all encompassing sound bite which is an example of nothing in of itself?